African Americans and the Obama Dilemma...
John_Browning
Veteran
Joined: 22 Mar 2009
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,456
Location: The shooting range
Keep in mind this was written by a black Author...
Election of our nation’s first black president is delivering an unexpected message to our black population.
Blacks are discovering that what a man or woman does – their actions – is what matters, not the color of his or her skin.
It seems ridiculous to point out that this was supposedly the point of the civil-rights movement. Purge racism from America.
But blacks themselves have been the ones having the hardest time letting it go.
It is not hard to understand why black Americans were happy that a black man was elected president of the United States. It was kind of a final and most grand announcement that racism has finally been purged from America.
But for the highly politicized parts of black America this was certainly not the only message. Because for the highly politicized parts of black America, the point has always been to keep race in American politics.
For black political culture that dominated after the civil-rights movement, the point was not just equal treatment under the law, but special treatment under the law – plus the assumption that more black political power, defined by more blacks holding office, would mean that blacks would be better off.
In other words, post-civil-rights movement black political culture embraced an agenda exactly the opposite of what the civil-rights movement was about. Its agenda was to get laws and policies that were not neutral but racially slanted and to put individuals in power based on their race and not on their character and capability.
So, according to the script of this political culture, election of a black man as president meant more than an end to racism. The conclusion had to be that if the man holding the highest political office in the nation was black, it must follow that blacks would be better off.
Now blacks have a dilemma. We have a black president, and blacks are worse off. Not just a little, but a lot worse off.
In the words of longtime Congressional Black Caucus member Maxine Waters, D-Calif., “Our people are hurtin’.”
Blacks now grapple with two possible conclusions.
One, our black president is a traitor to his race. Our struggles put him in power and now he’s not taking care of his folks. He’s become, in the words of left-wing professor and activist Cornel West, a “mascot” of Wall Street.
Or, two, that the man’s performance reflects his views and his capability, not his race. He’s not delivering for anyone. Blacks are hurting more because they were already in worse shape when Obama got elected. Bad policies hurt the weakest the most.
And it happens that the bad policies that have always failed are the big government liberalism that has defined modern black politics.
With further thought, blacks might realize it’s this same flawed idea – that growing government and electing black politicians would make blacks better off – that explains why blacks have remained disproportionately “hurtin’.”
Take the Congressional Black Caucus itself. The average poverty rate in Black Caucus districts is almost 50 percent higher than the national average. Yet, these black politicians have 100 percent re-election rates.
Maybe a real bonus that will have come from electing a black president is that blacks will take seriously Dr. King’s dream that we judge men by their character and not their color.
The civil-rights movement took blacks to the edge of the promised land. But political activism can only remove barriers to freedom. It’s up to the individual to embrace freedom and take on the personal responsibilities that go with it.
Maybe blacks will realize that they should blame Barack Obama. Not because he is black, but because he is a liberal – and because he has grown government to the point where the oxygen necessary for freedom and prosperity is being squeezed out of our nation.
http://www.freedomsjournal.net/2011/08/21/african-americans-and-the-obama-dilemma
_________________
"Gun control is like trying to reduce drunk driving by making it tougher for sober people to own cars."
- Unknown
"A fear of weapons is a sign of ret*d sexual and emotional maturity."
-Sigmund Freud
As long as the bosses are disproportionately not black and they are the gatekeepers determining the fates of the people and are more inclined to hire and promote people "like them", black people will be disadvantaged in the USA. One answer is to take away the awesome power the bosses have and they've been given increasing powers these last 30 years including by Obama. Abolishing NAIRU as policy holy writ is a first step. The answer therefore is Big Government!
Liberals actually want Blacks to stay impoverished so they have voting block locked into place.
Conservatives want people to succeed or fail based on merit, and who cares about what skin color someone is.
I do not see any sign of a dilemma.
The dilemma is that as an incumbent he's unlikely to have a serious challenger in the primaries, independents are generally dead in the water in a presidential election, and the republican candidates are just... epic fail. THAT'S the dilemma.
I do not see any sign of a dilemma.
The dilemma is that as an incumbent he's unlikely to have a serious challenger in the primaries, independents are generally dead in the water in a presidential election, and the republican candidates are just... epic fail. THAT'S the dilemma.
Oh really?
Pretty much every Republican in the running or potentially running couldn't do any worse than Obama has (and probably would do a lot better job) including Ron Paul!
I do not see any sign of a dilemma.
The dilemma is that as an incumbent he's unlikely to have a serious challenger in the primaries, independents are generally dead in the water in a presidential election, and the republican candidates are just... epic fail. THAT'S the dilemma.
Oh really?
Pretty much every Republican in the running or potentially running couldn't do any worse than Obama has (and probably would do a lot better job) including Ron Paul!
Obama pretty much accomplished everything on the republican agenda. He carried over the Bush tax cuts, gave corporations free money, and continued 2 wars. I know republicans generally have an attention span of about 2 weeks, but all the stuff Obama did that failed horribly were republican ideas going a couple of years back. So really, any republican president would've done the same, with the possible exception of killing Bin Laden. For all republicans' tough talk, I doubt any of them, cowboy Bush included, would've had the balls to go into Pakistan. It's easy to invade a country that has a military 1/100 the size of yours with far inferior technology, with the approval of the international community, but going into Pakistan was an actual risk, at least diplomatically. So as I see it, any republican president would have us in the exact same position except Bin Laden would probably still be shacked up with his 3 wives and porn library.
I do not see any sign of a dilemma.
The dilemma is that as an incumbent he's unlikely to have a serious challenger in the primaries, independents are generally dead in the water in a presidential election, and the republican candidates are just... epic fail. THAT'S the dilemma.
I say again, I see no dilemma.
Speaking very cynical here:
If you are inclined Republican, you are not going to vote Obama. Period.
If you are inclined Democrat, you [unless something big happens the next few months] are stuck voting Obama. If he does not run - unless it is CLEARLY his decision - not trying to reelect him will look either like racism or like admitting to a mistake. Political parties do not easily admit mistakes,
If you are neither, like me, your vote is not going to count anyway, so where is the dilemma?
I do not see any sign of a dilemma.
The dilemma is that as an incumbent he's unlikely to have a serious challenger in the primaries, independents are generally dead in the water in a presidential election, and the republican candidates are just... epic fail. THAT'S the dilemma.
Oh really?
Pretty much every Republican in the running or potentially running couldn't do any worse than Obama has (and probably would do a lot better job) including Ron Paul!
Obama pretty much accomplished everything on the republican agenda. He carried over the Bush tax cuts, gave corporations free money, and continued 2 wars. I know republicans generally have an attention span of about 2 weeks, but all the stuff Obama did that failed horribly were republican ideas going a couple of years back. So really, any republican president would've done the same, with the possible exception of killing Bin Laden. For all republicans' tough talk, I doubt any of them, cowboy Bush included, would've had the balls to go into Pakistan. It's easy to invade a country that has a military 1/100 the size of yours with far inferior technology, with the approval of the international community, but going into Pakistan was an actual risk, at least diplomatically. So as I see it, any republican president would have us in the exact same position except Bin Laden would probably still be shacked up with his 3 wives and porn library.
I wasn't aware that the Republican Agenda included telling Boeing that it couldn't have a factory in South Carolina, and having no problem with GE shipping jobs to China...
Probably cause it wasn't part of the Republican Agenda.
I wasn't aware that forcing people to buy a certain product was part of the Republican Agenda (individual mandate in Obamacare).
Probably cause it wasn't (aside from Mitt Romney and his Romneycare (which is why I don't want Mitt to be the nominee)).
I could probably come up with a lot more examples as to what Obama did that was not part of the "Republican Agenda."
As for Bin Laden, okay fine we caught him and he's dead; I will point out that Bin Laden was probably killed in spite of Obama, not due to Obama's leadership.
You have been downgraded from political nut to crackpot conspiracy theorist. If you believe there has been a mistake in the change, send us a notarized complaint letter by Monday, thank you.
_________________
.
Last edited by Vexcalibur on 03 Sep 2011, 5:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
You have been downgraded from political nut to crackpot conspiracy theorists. If you believe there has been a mistake in the change, send us a notarized complaint letter by Monday, thank you.
Whatever....
I don't see Detroit looking any better, and a lot of the places with all these welfare things going on haven't improved at all over the course of decades. We see people locked into poverty, not people striving to get out of welfare.
You have been downgraded from political nut to crackpot conspiracy theorist. If you believe there has been a mistake in the change, send us a notarized complaint letter by Monday, thank you.
It sure as hell makes sense. Liberals perpetuate poverty via welfare dependence. The more welfare dependent voters the more votes to put or keep liberal politicians on office.
They sure as hell won’t be voting for someone against welfare or is pushing for welfare reform.
In a way it’s a form of mutually agreed upon slavery.
What is that Chinese proverb?
“Give a man a fish and feed him for a day, teach him to fish and feed him for life”, or something like that.
The liberal wants to feed him with someone else’s fish for a lifetime, though.
You’re not going to try and tell me that all those voting precincts in the poorer neigborhoods turn in republican votes are you?
Last edited by Raptor on 04 Sep 2011, 11:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
MarketAndChurch
Veteran
Joined: 3 Apr 2011
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,022
Location: The Peoples Republic Of Portland
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2 ... acuum.html
Anyone contemplating a run against Obama must consider the consequences of not only defeating the president, but the likely repercussions to his or her own career. “If he were white, he would have a progressive challenger,” says Bill Schneider of the Democratic group Third Way. Because Obama is this historic figure, challenging him would hamper the prospects of anyone who wants a future in elective Democratic politics. “Blacks would be deeply offended by a challenge, and that’s no way to score points in the Democratic Party,” says Schneider. African-Americans are the Democrats’ most loyal constituency, and while they too are disappointed in what Obama has been able to accomplish, they are not going to abandon him.
_________________
It is not up to you to finish the task, nor are you free to desist from trying.
