Page 1 of 3 [ 46 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next


What is your stance upon freedom of speech?
I am for freedom of speech, regardless of whether I may get offended at the words of others or not. 75%  75%  [ 15 ]
I am for freedom of speech, but only that variety of speech I particularly wish to hear. 5%  5%  [ 1 ]
I am against freedom of speech in general. 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
I am a dinosaur. RAWR. (other) 20%  20%  [ 4 ]
Total votes : 20

iamnotaparakeet
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jul 2007
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 25,091
Location: 0.5 Galactic radius

14 Oct 2010, 7:18 pm

So as to be as inoffensive as possible, especially considering the website is supported by private ad revenue, should PPR only allow Happy Talk? No more pessimism or sarcasm. No more serious debates, heated or otherwise, since debates might hurt peoples feelings if they are contradicted at all. Should only that which is friendly and cheerful be permitted and any offenders of this rule be merrily beheaded for the greater good?



MissConstrue
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Feb 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 17,052
Location: MO

14 Oct 2010, 7:37 pm

"Happy thoughts"

Birds.....free them from the cage.. :D


_________________
I live as I choose or I will not live at all.
~Delores O’Riordan


iamnotaparakeet
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jul 2007
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 25,091
Location: 0.5 Galactic radius

14 Oct 2010, 7:42 pm

MissConstrue wrote:
"Happy thoughts"

Birds.....free them from the cage.. :D


Actually, the birds I take care of only have an open cage where I place food and water for them. I can't stand to see them locked up, so they stay out.



Macbeth
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 May 2007
Age: 48
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,984
Location: UK Doncaster

14 Oct 2010, 7:53 pm

One man's happy thoughts are another man's phrenologically sound racist rhetoric and hyperbole.


_________________
"There is a time when the operation of the machine becomes so odious, makes you so sick at heart,
that you can't take part" [Mario Savo, 1964]


iamnotaparakeet
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jul 2007
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 25,091
Location: 0.5 Galactic radius

14 Oct 2010, 8:01 pm

Macbeth wrote:
One man's happy thoughts are another man's phrenologically sound racist rhetoric and hyperbole.


You offend me. *Boom*.



DW_a_mom
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Feb 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 13,689
Location: Northern California

14 Oct 2010, 8:02 pm

It's kind a slanted poll, isn't it? There are reasonable reasons someone might want to limit freedom of speech in PPR that are not listed as options on your list. Not to say I would have picked one, but I get really frustrate viewing polls designed to reach a forgone conclusion. I get enough of those in my mail from various political action interests.


_________________
Mom to an amazing young adult AS son, plus an also amazing non-AS daughter. Most likely part of the "Broader Autism Phenotype" (some traits).


iamnotaparakeet
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jul 2007
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 25,091
Location: 0.5 Galactic radius

14 Oct 2010, 8:05 pm

DW_a_mom wrote:
It's kind a slanted poll, isn't it? There are reasonable reasons someone might want to limit freedom of speech in PPR that are not listed as options on your list. Not to say I would have picked one, but I get really frustrate viewing polls designed to reach a forgone conclusion. I get enough of those in my mail from various political action interests.


There is the *Other* option for people who wish to answer independently of the polling options provided by the original poster. Really though, there are three primary options: full, limited, or none. To delineate the variety of limitations would be just to expand upon the second option.



Dox47
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Jan 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,670
Location: Seattle-ish

14 Oct 2010, 8:11 pm

DW_a_mom wrote:
It's kind a slanted poll, isn't it? There are reasonable reasons someone might want to limit freedom of speech in PPR that are not listed as options on your list. Not to say I would have picked one, but I get really frustrate viewing polls designed to reach a forgone conclusion. I get enough of those in my mail from various political action interests.


I think 'Keet is just getting a bit frustrated banging his head against a few very stubborn walls over in the other thread, so he's trying to demonstrate the weaknesses of his opponents' positions by taking them to some unpleasant logical conclusions. I don't think it's going to work in swaying the people it's actually targeted at, they're too dug in at this point; but for some forum users who are/were on the the fence concerning the direction of the forum I can see them being helpful illustrations of why narrow restrictions are preferable.


_________________
Your boos mean nothing, I've seen what makes you cheer.

- Rick Sanchez


John_Browning
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Mar 2009
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,456
Location: The shooting range

14 Oct 2010, 8:29 pm

I voted for freedom of speech even if it means being offended at times.


_________________
"Gun control is like trying to reduce drunk driving by making it tougher for sober people to own cars."
- Unknown

"A fear of weapons is a sign of ret*d sexual and emotional maturity."
-Sigmund Freud


iamnotaparakeet
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jul 2007
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 25,091
Location: 0.5 Galactic radius

14 Oct 2010, 9:51 pm

Dox47 wrote:
DW_a_mom wrote:
It's kind a slanted poll, isn't it? There are reasonable reasons someone might want to limit freedom of speech in PPR that are not listed as options on your list. Not to say I would have picked one, but I get really frustrate viewing polls designed to reach a forgone conclusion. I get enough of those in my mail from various political action interests.


I think 'Keet is just getting a bit frustrated banging his head against a few very stubborn walls over in the other thread, so he's trying to demonstrate the weaknesses of his opponents' positions by taking them to some unpleasant logical conclusions. ...


That's pretty much the case.



iamnotaparakeet
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jul 2007
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 25,091
Location: 0.5 Galactic radius

14 Oct 2010, 10:45 pm

John_Browning wrote:
I voted for freedom of speech even if it means being offended at times.


I agree.



greenblue
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Mar 2007
Age: 50
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,896
Location: Home

14 Oct 2010, 10:50 pm

You miss this option: I am for the freedom of my speech, not others, not yours.


_________________
?Everything is perfect in the universe - even your desire to improve it.?


Last edited by greenblue on 14 Oct 2010, 10:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.

iamnotaparakeet
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jul 2007
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 25,091
Location: 0.5 Galactic radius

14 Oct 2010, 10:54 pm

greenblue wrote:
You miss this option: I am for freedom of my speech, not others.


That falls under the second category, rather an extreme of the second category. A person couldn't hope to obtain this unless his name is Kim Jong-Il though.



BigK
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 13 Jan 2008
Age: 61
Gender: Male
Posts: 400

15 Oct 2010, 1:31 am

I am against spamming the forum with thread after thread of utter nonsense.


_________________
"It's a dangerous business, Frodo, going out of your door," he used to say. "You step into the Road, and if you don't keep your feet, there is no knowing where you might be swept off to.

"How can it not know what it is?"


iamnotaparakeet
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jul 2007
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 25,091
Location: 0.5 Galactic radius

15 Oct 2010, 1:46 am

BigK wrote:
I am against spamming the forum with thread after thread of utter nonsense.


Good for you. However I am in favor of the promulgation of utter nonsense, non-utter nonsense, utter sense, and non-utter sense.



Dox47
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Jan 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,670
Location: Seattle-ish

15 Oct 2010, 2:47 am

BigK wrote:
I am against spamming the forum with thread after thread of utter nonsense.


Great! When do you stop posting?


_________________
Your boos mean nothing, I've seen what makes you cheer.

- Rick Sanchez