Why can't the far right appreciate a cease to an epidemic

Page 1 of 1 [ 15 posts ] 

AugustX
Tufted Titmouse
Tufted Titmouse

User avatar

Joined: 21 Dec 2011
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 40

29 Dec 2011, 10:35 pm

Because obesity is getting into our very costly system? How the hell do they justify being so careless at times?



Jacoby
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 10 Dec 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 14,284
Location: Arizona

29 Dec 2011, 11:44 pm

how do you stop obesity?



Tequila
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 25 Feb 2006
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 28,897
Location: Lancashire, UK

29 Dec 2011, 11:59 pm

AugustX wrote:
Because obesity is getting into our very costly system?


How about minding your own business?

And who are you calling 'far-right'? In Europe and Australia/New Zealand that term is reserved for neo-Nazis, extreme racial/ethnic nationalists and other fascists. Controversially, the term is used (I would say misused) by media outlets and some left-wingers in order to refer to the nascent national conservative political parties across Europe who have an opposition to mass immigration and Islam as part of their platform.

Also, instead of using finances in order to scaremonger and pick on fat people I think you'll find that it's 'healthier' people that cost more money to the healthcare system.



peebo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Mar 2006
Age: 51
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,624
Location: scotland

30 Dec 2011, 6:07 am

Tequila wrote:
Also, instead of using finances in order to scaremonger and pick on fat people I think you'll find that it's 'healthier' people that cost more money to the healthcare system.


how do you come to this conclusion?


_________________
?Civil government, so far as it is instituted for the security of property, is in reality instituted for the defense of the rich against the poor, or of those who have some property against those who have none at all.?

Adam Smith


Tequila
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 25 Feb 2006
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 28,897
Location: Lancashire, UK

30 Dec 2011, 7:15 am

peebo wrote:
how do you come to this conclusion?


Both anecdotally and through research. Fat people and smokers tend to die off earlier, saving the health care system money. See here (http://www.adamsmith.org/blog/health/fatties-and-smokers-save-the-nhs-money).



Oodain
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Jan 2011
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,022
Location: in my own little tamarillo jungle,

30 Dec 2011, 7:33 am

i would very much like to see this research.


_________________
//through chaos comes complexity//

the scent of the tamarillo is pungent and powerfull,
woe be to the nose who nears it.


Tequila
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 25 Feb 2006
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 28,897
Location: Lancashire, UK

30 Dec 2011, 7:58 am

Oodain wrote:
i would very much like to see this research.


Well, smokers in the UK donate far more to the UK treasury through taxes, which then goes to give them often sub-standard treatment (and possible treatment refusal) on the NHS.



Oodain
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Jan 2011
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,022
Location: in my own little tamarillo jungle,

30 Dec 2011, 8:25 am

thats not research, thats anecdotes.

you said you had researched the subject and as such i expect to see some evidence,


_________________
//through chaos comes complexity//

the scent of the tamarillo is pungent and powerfull,
woe be to the nose who nears it.


ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 89
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

30 Dec 2011, 12:47 pm

Jacoby wrote:
how do you stop obesity?


By not eating too much and by exercising more.

ruveyn



snapcap
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Oct 2011
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,328

30 Dec 2011, 12:56 pm

I've seen videos of people performing liposuction on themselves...Maybe it should be a new life skill?



Tequila
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 25 Feb 2006
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 28,897
Location: Lancashire, UK

30 Dec 2011, 1:13 pm

Oodain wrote:
thats not research, thats anecdotes.


OK, you want research?

In the UK, the Government takes around £11bn in tax from tobacco sales every year. Tobacco is extremely highly taxed in the UK and buying in Britain is even more expensive than in Denmark. A packet of 20 cigarettes is around 45 DKK (or £5) a pack in Denmark, right? It tells you something is amiss when there is considerable incentive in buys cigarettes from Denmark to take home to the UK because they're cheaper there (we've done this). In the UK it's more like £6.50 for a packet of 20 (equivalent to around 58 DKK). The Irish have the most expensive cigarettes in Europe - a packet of 20 costs around €8.65 (£7.25; 65 DKK) there!

The cost of the UK NHS is around £100bn a year I believe. £5bn is the figure quoted in the press for how much it costs the NHS to treat smokers (and I'll bet the farm that all sorts of nonsense that isn't anything to do with smoking is chucked in to create that figure - for instance, a lot of things are listed as 'alcohol-related' with the NHS when they have little or nothing to do with alcohol - someone comes into the doctor's after having a pint or two with a complaint not to do with alcohol? It's still classed as alcohol-related!). Even at that most likely ludicrously inflated figure, smokers pay the UK taxpayer more than double what they put in. And yet the NHS still sees fit to treat smokers as if they were Üntermenschen.

I can give you links if you want them.

Quote:
you said you had researched the subject and as such i expect to see some evidence,



peebo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Mar 2006
Age: 51
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,624
Location: scotland

30 Dec 2011, 1:25 pm

Oodain wrote:
thats not research, thats anecdotes.

you said you had researched the subject and as such i expect to see some evidence,


well the fact about tobacco taxation is obvious, though. the huge majority of the price of tobacco here is tax. retailers make something like 15p on a £6.50 packet of cigarettes. it might even be less. i looked onto this once after talking about it with the guy on the local shop round here. you'll find exact information if you google it. in fact here's a table that gives you the tax revenue on cigarette sales in the uk. quite a lot.

http://www.the-tma.org.uk/tma-publicati ... m-tobacco/


_________________
?Civil government, so far as it is instituted for the security of property, is in reality instituted for the defense of the rich against the poor, or of those who have some property against those who have none at all.?

Adam Smith


peebo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Mar 2006
Age: 51
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,624
Location: scotland

30 Dec 2011, 1:27 pm

Tequila wrote:
Oodain wrote:
thats not research, thats anecdotes.


OK, you want research?

In the UK, the Government takes around £11bn in tax from tobacco sales every year. Tobacco is extremely highly taxed in the UK and buying in Britain is even more expensive than in Denmark. A packet of 20 cigarettes is around 45 DKK (or £5) a pack in Denmark, right? It tells you something is amiss when there is considerable incentive in buys cigarettes from Denmark to take home to the UK because they're cheaper there (we've done this). In the UK it's more like £6.50 for a packet of 20 (equivalent to around 58 DKK). The Irish have the most expensive cigarettes in Europe - a packet of 20 costs around €8.65 (£7.25; 65 DKK) there!

The cost of the UK NHS is around £100bn a year I believe. £5bn is the figure quoted in the press for how much it costs the NHS to treat smokers (and I'll bet the farm that all sorts of nonsense that isn't anything to do with smoking is chucked in to create that figure - for instance, a lot of things are listed as 'alcohol-related' with the NHS when they have little or nothing to do with alcohol - someone comes into the doctor's after having a pint or two with a complaint not to do with alcohol? It's still classed as alcohol-related!). Even at that most likely ludicrously inflated figure, smokers pay the UK taxpayer more than double what they put in. And yet the NHS still sees fit to treat smokers as if they were Üntermenschen.

I can give you links if you want them.

Quote:
you said you had researched the subject and as such i expect to see some evidence,


right, so if you look at the table i linked above you'll see that they are £6 billion in credit for this year on smoking related illness vs tobacco tax.


_________________
?Civil government, so far as it is instituted for the security of property, is in reality instituted for the defense of the rich against the poor, or of those who have some property against those who have none at all.?

Adam Smith


Oodain
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Jan 2011
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,022
Location: in my own little tamarillo jungle,

30 Dec 2011, 1:59 pm

how does this tie into obesity?

as far as smoking goes it doesnt surprise me, just as the alcohol tax would probably be the same.

as i see it obesity is a choice for most people, some really cant lose wheight but mostly its a matter of matching intake and output.


_________________
//through chaos comes complexity//

the scent of the tamarillo is pungent and powerfull,
woe be to the nose who nears it.


peebo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Mar 2006
Age: 51
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,624
Location: scotland

30 Dec 2011, 2:19 pm

i was only commenting on tequila's comment on smoking. as far as obesity, i don't know much about it but a quick google search revealed this article: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/05/healt ... .html?_r=2


_________________
?Civil government, so far as it is instituted for the security of property, is in reality instituted for the defense of the rich against the poor, or of those who have some property against those who have none at all.?

Adam Smith