Vexcalibur wrote:
Come on, we are not fools. Either you meant that and are now retreating or you really, really suck at stating your own opinion.
Well apparently you suck at reading comprehension, because it is quite clear from my statement that I was referring to casual sex as being a leisure activity, not birth control. And don't think I haven't already anticipated your next argument, I'm going to let you make it so that you can back yourself into a corner even more.
Vexcalibur wrote:
Hell yeah. To any tax payer, at least. Albeit giving it to people that are currently not citizens or can't pay taxes is a great idea too..
Then answer my question posed to AstroGeek. What would the limit be on how much birth control a single person can use, if any?
MjrMajorMajor wrote:
Where is the limit for the amount of children born to parents unable or unwilling to financially support their offspring?
That is nonsensical and completely unrelated to my question.
Oodain wrote:
not all birth control is dependant on how much sex you have
Right, but most birth control is dependent on how much sex you have, and you're going to have to make those forms of birth control available as well since not everyone wants to use the pill due to its side effects. So, what is the limit?