TallyMan wrote:
I'll throw in three arguments contra:
1. The more realistic a fembot is to a real woman, the easier it would likely be for the "user" of such a fembot to transfer any sadomasochistic fantasies onto real women, abusing, hurting or raping them.
2. If fembots eventually did have sufficient cognition to be regarding as truly living organisms in their own right and consequently end up with rights, I could foresee a real can of worms opening up. Fembots demonstrating on the streets demanding freedom from "slavery".
3. Didn't you see the public information film on Futurama warning against the use of fembots?

It will be the end of the human race I tell you... nobody will want real women any more and no more babies will be born!

1. I see this argument a lot and I see it as nothing more than a slippery slope argument. After all, we have violent games and thus far, gamers are not all a bunch of homicidal maniacs. I argue that the idea of a fembot might actually reduce someone's tendency to transfer their sadomasochistic urges onto human beings. i mean, it's more convenient to just beat the s**t out of something that is designed to take your beatings and that you have right there than to plan something like that on a human.
2. I did point our that as long as they did not have personhood/self awareness then I would be cool with it. I mean, making sex bots that actually have emotions kind of defeats the purpose of having one in the first place.
3. Haha, well we're a little overpopulated anyway.
Foxfield, I can see how this could be used as a form of eugenics but I agree with Puddingmouse - I don't think genetics is the main problem with folk like that. Also, personally, I think that the concept of a fembot is just a very complex dildo. Just because you use a sex toy, it doesn't make you a creep and in the future, we'll probably be exploiting robot slaves all the time anyway, haha