Board index › Topical Discussion › Politics, Philosophy, and Religion

Foreign Policy Death Panels

Page 1 of 1 [ 15 posts ] 

Previous topic | Next topic

Master_Pedant
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Mar 2009
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,903

30 May 2012, 6:51 pm

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iLrn8Bcudp8[/youtube]


_________________
http://www.voterocky.org/


Raptor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,997
Location: Southeast U.S.A.

30 May 2012, 8:05 pm

Without listening to that douchebag drone on for 12 minutes that I'll never get back, I'll just sum it up as this:
Barack has realized that it takes certain measures, unpleasant as they may be, to keep the boogeyman at bay.
I can at least step up to the plate and praise him for that much.....



snapcap
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Oct 2011
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,328

30 May 2012, 8:55 pm

Obama's kill list - all males near drone strike sites are terrorists

Quote:
Depending on whom you ask, the Obama administration has either executed hundreds of civilians abroad with poorly planned drone strikes or none at all. A new report, however, finally offers insight into those conflicting conclusions...The White House convinces itself that the Obama-ordered air strikes overseas have not killed many civilians because, according to the president, any and all men near around a drone target are considered enemies of America and can be executed without being added to the count of civilian casualties.


Drones are going to be over the US and the military is conducting tours in the US, DHS buying up 450 million rounds of ammo, and on top of that, sec. 1031 & 1032 of the 2012 NDAA. Can you add 1+1?


_________________
*some atheist walks outside and picks up stick*

some atheist to stick: "You're like me!"


AstroGeek
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Jan 2011
Age: 32
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,582

30 May 2012, 9:13 pm

Raptor wrote:
Barack has realized that it takes certain measures, unpleasant as they may be, to keep the boogeyman at bay.

Boogeyman. What a telling choice of words; a fictitious entity designed to scare children into behaving.



Raptor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,997
Location: Southeast U.S.A.

31 May 2012, 6:26 pm

I was using the term boogeyman to describe those who would and have done harm to us.

That clarification aside, I guess the reason this thread hasn't gotten many replies of outrage and screams for justice is because it's Obama being naughty and not George W or some other horrible horrible republican.
Guess it all just depends on which side of the bread your butter is on..................
:?



AstroGeek
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Jan 2011
Age: 32
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,582

31 May 2012, 6:30 pm

Raptor wrote:
I was using the term boogeyman to describe those who would and have done harm to us.

That clarification aside, I guess the reason this thread hasn't gotten many replies of outrage and screams for justice is because it's Obama being naughty and not George W or some other horrible horrible republican.
Guess it all just depends on which side of the bread your butter is on..................
:?

I don't like Obama that much more than Bush. There is relatively little difference between their foreign policies. If I was American I would probably vote for a third party.



Raptor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,997
Location: Southeast U.S.A.

31 May 2012, 6:36 pm

AstroGeek wrote:
Raptor wrote:
I was using the term boogeyman to describe those who would and have done harm to us.

That clarification aside, I guess the reason this thread hasn't gotten many replies of outrage and screams for justice is because it's Obama being naughty and not George W or some other horrible horrible republican.
Guess it all just depends on which side of the bread your butter is on..................
:?

I don't like Obama that much more than Bush. There is relatively little difference between their foreign policies. If I was American I would probably vote for a third party.


A 3rd party presidential vote in this country is pretty much a vote flushed down the toilet..............



snapcap
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Oct 2011
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,328

31 May 2012, 6:47 pm

Raptor wrote:
AstroGeek wrote:
Raptor wrote:
I was using the term boogeyman to describe those who would and have done harm to us.

That clarification aside, I guess the reason this thread hasn't gotten many replies of outrage and screams for justice is because it's Obama being naughty and not George W or some other horrible horrible republican.
Guess it all just depends on which side of the bread your butter is on..................
:?

I don't like Obama that much more than Bush. There is relatively little difference between their foreign policies. If I was American I would probably vote for a third party.


A 3rd party presidential vote in this country is pretty much a vote flushed down the toilet..............


Sounds like what someone would say if they are in love with the current Democian/ Repulicrat paradigm.

What tastes better? A douche or a deuce?


_________________
*some atheist walks outside and picks up stick*

some atheist to stick: "You're like me!"


Raptor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,997
Location: Southeast U.S.A.

31 May 2012, 6:53 pm

snapcap wrote:
Raptor wrote:
AstroGeek wrote:
Raptor wrote:
I was using the term boogeyman to describe those who would and have done harm to us.

That clarification aside, I guess the reason this thread hasn't gotten many replies of outrage and screams for justice is because it's Obama being naughty and not George W or some other horrible horrible republican.
Guess it all just depends on which side of the bread your butter is on..................
:?

I don't like Obama that much more than Bush. There is relatively little difference between their foreign policies. If I was American I would probably vote for a third party.


A 3rd party presidential vote in this country is pretty much a vote flushed down the toilet..............


Sounds like what someone would say if they are in love with the current Democian/ Repulicrat paradigm.

What tastes better? A douche or a deuce?


No, I'm a realist. Unless some 3rd partier comes along and get's really good public support well into the election year it's just not gonna happen.
I'm voting for Romney this time around. My vote for a 3rd party candidate instead would in effect be me voting for Obama.
Kick it around some more if you want but I'm done discussing this 3rd party fantasy....



Joker
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Mar 2011
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,593
Location: North Carolina The Tar Heel State :)

31 May 2012, 7:23 pm

their is no third party in america but the Indpendent party is the closest thing you will get to a third party.



snapcap
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Oct 2011
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,328

31 May 2012, 7:47 pm

Raptor wrote:
snapcap wrote:
Raptor wrote:
AstroGeek wrote:
Raptor wrote:
I was using the term boogeyman to describe those who would and have done harm to us.

That clarification aside, I guess the reason this thread hasn't gotten many replies of outrage and screams for justice is because it's Obama being naughty and not George W or some other horrible horrible republican.
Guess it all just depends on which side of the bread your butter is on..................
:?

I don't like Obama that much more than Bush. There is relatively little difference between their foreign policies. If I was American I would probably vote for a third party.


A 3rd party presidential vote in this country is pretty much a vote flushed down the toilet..............


Sounds like what someone would say if they are in love with the current Democian/ Repulicrat paradigm.

What tastes better? A douche or a deuce?


No, I'm a realist. Unless some 3rd partier comes along and get's really good public support well into the election year it's just not gonna happen.
I'm voting for Romney this time around. My vote for a 3rd party candidate instead would in effect be me voting for Obama.
Kick it around some more if you want but I'm done discussing this 3rd party fantasy....


You do realize you'll never get a third party candidate until you start supporting them, right?

"I really need to go on a diet, but I'll start tomorrow."

Does Mitt taste like douche or deuce? My taste buds aren't that astute.


_________________
*some atheist walks outside and picks up stick*

some atheist to stick: "You're like me!"


Master_Pedant
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Mar 2009
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,903

31 May 2012, 10:10 pm

Raptor wrote:
snapcap wrote:
Raptor wrote:
AstroGeek wrote:
Raptor wrote:
I was using the term boogeyman to describe those who would and have done harm to us.

That clarification aside, I guess the reason this thread hasn't gotten many replies of outrage and screams for justice is because it's Obama being naughty and not George W or some other horrible horrible republican.
Guess it all just depends on which side of the bread your butter is on..................
:?

I don't like Obama that much more than Bush. There is relatively little difference between their foreign policies. If I was American I would probably vote for a third party.


A 3rd party presidential vote in this country is pretty much a vote flushed down the toilet..............


Sounds like what someone would say if they are in love with the current Democian/ Repulicrat paradigm.

What tastes better? A douche or a deuce?


No, I'm a realist. Unless some 3rd partier comes along and get's really good public support well into the election year it's just not gonna happen.
I'm voting for Romney this time around. My vote for a 3rd party candidate instead would in effect be me voting for Obama.
Kick it around some more if you want but I'm done discussing this 3rd party fantasy....


That only makes sense if you live in an area where there's anything near a chance that the election will be decided by your single vote. That f*cking ain't going to happen, sorry if it blows your ego.


_________________
http://www.voterocky.org/


Master_Pedant
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Mar 2009
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,903

31 May 2012, 10:11 pm

Raptor wrote:
Barack has realized that it takes certain measures, unpleasant as they may be, to keep the boogeyman at bay.
I can at least step up to the plate and praise him for that much.....


Something tells me that if you were anywhere near the "signature strike" zones your tune would change.


_________________
http://www.voterocky.org/


John_Browning
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Mar 2009
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,456
Location: The shooting range

31 May 2012, 11:46 pm

I'd be okay with foreign assassinations if they were approved and vetoed by a house or senate subcommittee since they are elected and can be held accountable.

If Bush did this, the democrats and media would collectively and simultaneously both crap themselves and have a aneurism!


_________________
"Gun control is like trying to reduce drunk driving by making it tougher for sober people to own cars."
- Unknown

"A fear of weapons is a sign of ret*d sexual and emotional maturity."
-Sigmund Freud


Raptor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,997
Location: Southeast U.S.A.

01 Jun 2012, 9:26 am

Master_Pedant wrote:
Raptor wrote:
Barack has realized that it takes certain measures, unpleasant as they may be, to keep the boogeyman at bay.
I can at least step up to the plate and praise him for that much.....


Something tells me that if you were anywhere near the "signature strike" zones your tune would change.


Well I'm not in a signature strike zone and even if I were I'd see to it that my "tune" doesn't change just because.
BTW, why are you talking to someone you consider a troll?