Page 1 of 4 [ 52 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next

yelekam
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Jan 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 591

01 Aug 2013, 9:35 pm

Well its been nearly a year since the 2012 presidential election, so I the spirit of American politics, it time for speculation about the 2016 presidential potentials.

So who do you think would make good candidates for the tickets of the different parties?
who do you think will likely end up the candidates?
what do you think of those potential candidates?


and if you think its too early to talk about 2016, tell that to the people who have been talking about it in the news for the last several months.



yelekam
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Jan 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 591

01 Aug 2013, 9:40 pm

personally, I think it would be best if the Republicans nominated someone like Marco Rubio or Chris Christie and the Democrats nominated someone like Mark Warner; then you'd have candidates who are principled yet moderate enough to be able to work the other side to get things done.



wizamagog
Emu Egg
Emu Egg

User avatar

Joined: 28 Jul 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 8

01 Aug 2013, 10:21 pm

Naa, everyone's corrupt except for Congressmen, Limbaugh, and Levin. Even Fox. So it's obviously going to be Hillary vs. Paul Ryan.



AnonymousAnonymous
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 23 Nov 2006
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 76,346
Location: Portland, Oregon

02 Aug 2013, 1:25 pm

Does it matter?


_________________
Silly NTs, I have Aspergers, and having Aspergers is gr-r-reat!


Raptor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,997
Location: Southeast U.S.A.

02 Aug 2013, 1:36 pm

On this forum you'll start seeing considerable talk about it in the year before the election and it will get crazy by the actual election year.
Most of it is hand wringing over ANY republican candidate and how the world will end if they get elected, regardless of their actual chance of being elected.


_________________
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
- Thomas Jefferson


simon_says
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Jan 2011
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,075

02 Aug 2013, 2:38 pm

The GOP candidates will be mostly new to the hot seat of Presidential politics, and national politics. No way to say who will take to it and who won't. Might as well flip a coin. I'd bet Bush. He'll get the establishment and make fewer rookie mistakes.



The_Walrus
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Jan 2010
Age: 31
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,878
Location: London

02 Aug 2013, 3:23 pm

Marco Rubio would be the guy I'd want if I was a Republican and wanted to win. He might stand a decent chance of attracting a larger share of the Hispanic/Latino vote.



Raptor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,997
Location: Southeast U.S.A.

02 Aug 2013, 5:35 pm

Neither the republicans or the democrats will have anyone worthwhile to prop up.
Whoever the republican candidate will be I'm sure I'll find them only less repugnant than the democratic candidate.
Once again, voting for the lesser evil. :?


_________________
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
- Thomas Jefferson


auntblabby
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 115,227
Location: the island of defective toy santas

02 Aug 2013, 7:15 pm

Hilary might not feel like going through all that mess, again.



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 89
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

02 Aug 2013, 9:50 pm

yelekam wrote:
Well its been nearly a year since the 2012 presidential election, so I the spirit of American politics, it time for speculation about the 2016 presidential potentials.

So who do you think would make good candidates for the tickets of the different parties?
who do you think will likely end up the candidates?
what do you think of those potential candidates?


and if you think its too early to talk about 2016, tell that to the people who have been talking about it in the news for the last several months.


Sometime during the year after next year, likely front runners will emerge.

ruveyn



LKL
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jul 2007
Age: 50
Gender: Female
Posts: 7,402

02 Aug 2013, 10:44 pm

I vaguely remember a time when elections didn't start three years before the vote. Ahhh, the good old days...



ArrantPariah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2012
Age: 122
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,972

02 Aug 2013, 11:29 pm

Jesse Ventura would make it entertaining.

http://jesseventura2016.com/

Image

I'd also like to see Ron Jeremy enter the contest

Image



Master_Pedant
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Mar 2009
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,903

03 Aug 2013, 2:16 am

Raptor wrote:
Once again, voting for the lesser evil. :?


Tsk Tsk, what a bad strategy! :P

Image


_________________
http://www.voterocky.org/


TheHaywire
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 Oct 2009
Age: 42
Gender: Female
Posts: 531

03 Aug 2013, 2:53 pm

Here are my 2 predictions.

#1: Rand Paul will win. He will go against the NSA, surveillance, drone strikes... all the "hot issues" for the new generation. Thousands of people will register as Republicans and vote for him to fight for a free Internet. He will tap into the hacktivist mindset and take the country by storm, portraying himself as a Julian Assange type, impressing the gullible masses. Even people who believe that Democracy is crap will vote for Rand Paul. He will be the "resistance vote" against the liberal establishment. The GOP will basically be taken over by young Libertarians and old Republicans who are desperate to keep their party relevant. This will create a sense of political balance and everybody will calm down.

#2. Hilary Clinton will win, and things will get very ugly. The counter-revolt against the liberal establishment will either:

A. Go straight up Golden Dawn
B. Elect someone like Putin in 2020

Maybe this sounds scary, but if the Republicans do not win this one, the pendulum is going to swing much further to the right than the United States has been in quite some time.

Resistance is resistance, and history repeats itself.



Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

03 Aug 2013, 3:28 pm

Hillary will win by a landslide, because the Republicans will self destruct as their candidates try to suck up to their party's lunatic fringe led by the likes of Ted Cruz, thus hemorrhaging voters. And as Limbaugh and Beck sit in the charred ruins of the GOP, they'll tell their listeners they had lost again because their party wasn't ideologically pure enough yet. :lol:

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer



The_Walrus
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Jan 2010
Age: 31
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,878
Location: London

03 Aug 2013, 5:02 pm

TheHaywire wrote:

Maybe this sounds scary, but if the Republicans do not win this one, the pendulum is going to swing much further to the right than the United States has been in quite some time.

Isn't the problem that the Republicans are too right wing? Firstly, it makes them unelectable and out of touch with crucial parts of the electorate, and secondly, it allows the Democrats to take a centre-right, authoritarian position.

Ron Paul and the Libertarian party respectively failed to gain the Republican nomination and failed to gain 1% of the vote. It seems unlikely to me that Libertarianism will take the country by storm.