Page 1 of 1 [ 9 posts ] 

Master_Pedant
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Mar 2009
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,903

04 Aug 2013, 10:47 pm

Frank Rich wrote:
It was during the Clinton–Rubin–Greenspan–Lawrence Summers deregulatory spree of the nineties that the innovation of bipartisan lobbying shops also took off in earnest, obliterating any remaining distinctions between the financial interests and imperatives of the two parties. Before then, most Washington lobbying firms were affiliated with either one camp or the other—and suffered at the bottom line when their teams cycled out of power. So why not diversify the partnership pool as a hedge against defeat? What you’ll never hear on Morning Joe, with its incessant “Why can’t we all just get along?” bromides, is what Leibovich says in his opening pages—“that the city, far from being hopelessly divided, is in fact hopelessly interconnected.” It’s the friendly interconnectedness of special interests at the top more than the combative ideological divisions in the trenches below that makes the situation so hopeless. Two of the top three political-action-committee donors to Harry Reid and Mitch McConnell are the same: Comcast and AT&T, one of our government’s esteemed partners in domestic surveillance. The former Republican Senate leader Trent Lott and the former Democratic House leader Dick Gephardt are similarly united in lobbying for GE, best known of late for its remarkable record of ducking U.S. corporate taxes.


http://nymag.com/news/frank-rich/this-t ... ndex2.html

Don't find this too new or too surprising. After all, wasn't Gore Vidal saying post-war that America had only one party, the "business party" with marginally differing factions? America has never had a strong, labour-populist party gain power and has always been pretty ideologically one-sided (as is any place where social-liberalism represents the "extreme left").


_________________
http://www.voterocky.org/


Last edited by Master_Pedant on 05 Aug 2013, 6:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.

xenon13
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 Dec 2008
Age: 50
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,638

05 Aug 2013, 12:52 am

Death Race 2000 speaks of the dystopian future under the thumb of the Bipartisan Party.



Master_Pedant
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Mar 2009
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,903

05 Aug 2013, 2:10 am

xenon13 wrote:
Death Race 2000 speaks of the dystopian future under the thumb of the Bipartisan Party.


Haven't seen it (and just heard of it after you mentioned it).


_________________
http://www.voterocky.org/


Master_Pedant
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Mar 2009
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,903

05 Aug 2013, 6:39 pm

Also seemed like this thread was in due for a more descriptive title change.


_________________
http://www.voterocky.org/


xenon13
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 Dec 2008
Age: 50
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,638

05 Aug 2013, 9:29 pm

This obsession with "bipartisanship" makes one wonder why they idealise a de-facto One Party State...



nominalist
Supporting Member
Supporting Member

User avatar

Joined: 28 Jun 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,740
Location: Lower Rio Grande Valley of Texas (born in NYC)

06 Aug 2013, 12:34 am

Master_Pedant wrote:
After all, wasn't Gore Vidal saying post-war that America had only one party, the "business party" with marginally differing factions? America has never had a strong, labour-populist party gain power and has always been pretty ideologically one-sided (as is any place where social-liberalism represents the "extreme left").


Exactly. Both parties support the corporatocracy. In the U.S. Fox News Channel's claim to be "fair and balanced" is simply reinforcing a distinction without a difference.


_________________
Mark A. Foster, Ph.D. (retired tenured sociology professor)
36 domains/24 books: http://www.markfoster.net
Emancipated Autism: http://www.neurelitism.com
Institute for Dialectical metaRealism: http://dmr.institute


Master_Pedant
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Mar 2009
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,903

06 Aug 2013, 1:11 am

CORRECTION

He said "Property Party", not "business party".

Gore Vidal in the 1970s wrote:
There is only one party in the United States, the Property Party … and it has two right wings: Republican and Democrat. Republicans are a bit stupider, more rigid, more doctrinaire in their laissez-faire capitalism than the Democrats, who are cuter, prettier, a bit more corrupt — until recently… and more willing than the Republicans to make small adjustments when the poor, the black, the anti-imperialists get out of hand. But, essentially, there is no difference between the two parties.


http://www.gorevidalnow.com/2011/10/the-property-party/

Chomsky was the guy with "the business party" quote.


_________________
http://www.voterocky.org/


Dox47
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Jan 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,670
Location: Seattle-ish

06 Aug 2013, 1:41 am

Yep. I'm definitely more nervous when Congress seems to be getting along than when it's gridlocked, that's when we get abominations like the PATRIOT act.


_________________
Your boos mean nothing, I've seen what makes you cheer.

- Rick Sanchez


wittgenstein
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 May 2011
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,523
Location: Trapped inside a hominid skull

06 Aug 2013, 6:20 am

Agreed! The fact that we no longer have a RIGHT to a trial is hardly carried by the corporate controlled media. The most important news story in the history of our nation, the elimination of the bill of rights.
The "patriot " act (talk about Orwellian newspeak!) is the most unpatriotic, unamerican act ever passed. I consider those that endorsed it (both parties) as traitors.


_________________
YES! This is me!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-gtdlR4rUcY
I went up over 50 feet!
I love debate!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BtckVng_1a0
My debate style is calm and deadly!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-230v_ecAcM