Denmark lacks human rights

Post Reply New Topic

* Strict military discipline adopted in Danish schools. Danish psychologist professors welcome it.
(Article in Danish)
http://nyhederne.tv2.dk/samfund/2014-03 ... %C3%A5rden

* Conservative Party wants the police to torture suspects:
http://politiken.dk/indland/politik/ECE ... ge-tortur/
(Article in Danish).

* Many people are being pressured to commit suicide in Danish prison because of the horrible conditions:
http://www.fyens.dk/article/2472576:Ind ... -faengsler
(Article in Danish)

* TV-Censorship to prohibit spread of "socialist propaganda" (The ROJ-TV case), in order for Denmark to conform to Turkish law:
http://cphpost.dk/news/roj-tv-forced-to-close.8745.html

* Use of conscription to enforce discipline to young men.

* Making it compulsory for the severely handicapped to do forced labor tests even though they only worsen their condition.
http://www.handicap.dk/nyheder/fop-refo ... p-i-klemme
(Article in Danish)

I could mention more, but I think this gives you a clear picture of what is going on. Denmark used to be a lovely little country, calm and
nice place to live. But it is becoming increasingly more like a Fascist Dictatorship.

And the Danes like it. According to the recent polls, all of them give the Right Wing Fascist Coalition parties (VCOI) no less than 55 %.

I am beginning to hate my fellow countrymen, because more and more believe in fascist ideas.

I think my vote would be going to DF if I was Danish - certainly, I'd be voting for Morten in the Euros.

A political acquaintance of mine met Morten last year when he was in the UK. He spoke highly of him.

I'd better be off to order my jackboots and my Nazi armband.

I deleted my original comment, because I fear I could get in trouble.

If you think DF or Morten Messerschmidt is fascist, say so. Enough loudmouths say UKIP is fascist.

I'd like to learn more about DF other than what Wikipedia brings up, but desværre for mig, jeg kan ikke tale dansk.

The Danish People's party (Dansk Folkeparti) is not fascist.

On immigration issues, it is the party most closely aligned to the average voter in Denmark. If immigration was the only issue at election day, DF could have an absolute majority in the Danish parliament.

There is a common misconception that Denmark "turned to the right" in the 1990's. It did not.

What happened was that the Danish parliament turned to the right, thus approaching the political beliefs of the electorate. Ever since anyone started polling immigration attitudes in Denmark, there has been a massive majority in favour of a strict immigration policy. Due to the inherent weakness of a proportional representation electoral system, however, parliament has been excessively influenced by the Danish Social Liberal Party (Det Radikale Venstre), who has pushed an extremely lax immigration agenda that 7-8 out of 10 Danes are against...

Hahahaha. I also like how DRV winning any seats in the Parliament is "an inherent weakness" in the electoral system. Nope, no fascism here! No sir!

Gee, and here I am thinking all Scandinavians were social democrats!

Danish People's Party (Dansk Folkeparty, DF) is indeed a social welfare oriented party, and it did vote against the recent Disability Reform, because they believed it to be too hard
on the most vulnerable citizens of the country.

But Morten Messeschmidt is something completely different, although his is a high-ranking member of DF:
He believes that disabled people who cannot work because of their situation, should simply pull themselves together and don't whine, and start working instead.

THAT, to me, is Fascist belief!

I will NEVER place my vote at someone who has spoken against the welfare system of Denmark.
I don't trust Morten Messerschmidt.

Also I should remind you that DF is NOT socially welfare oriented in the EU parliament. They are member of the Conservative groups.
Danes don't understand the EU. They think that what DF stands for at home is the same in the EU. But it is not so.

Venstre is with the Libertarians, so is the "left-wing" party Radikale Venstre. There are only two Danish parties not members of the European fascist coalition, known as the Liberal-Conservative groups.
These are Socialist People's Party and the Social-Democrats.

The inherent weakness is that of the pivotal mandate. The Danish parliament has 179 members. The political party which has the 90th mandate has significant power because it is neccessary for any majority coalition to the left or right. Even if this political party is small and has a nonrepresentative policy, it can force parliament to enact these policies by threatening to bring down a government coalition. This is what happened in the 1980s and 1990s, when the DRV held the pivotal mandate. It used this position to enforce an immigration policy which the vast majority of the Danish population was against.

This sparked a significant voter backlash which led to the rise of the Danish People's Party and the tightening of Danish immigration policy after the 2001 election. Now, the DRV has the pivotal mandate - again - and is pushing an immigration policy which the electorate is against - again. However, the current government coalition stands to lose massively in the next election, so we may see a tightening of Danish immigration policy after the next election - again.

What kind of social democrats? Nationalist social democrats? Conservative social democrats? Liberal (often 'liberal') social democrats? Those parties further to the left?

The Scandinavian countries are pretty social democratic, yes, but there are tendencies within them. From parties that go further left, to moderate liberal centrist parties like the Centre Party, to nationalist social democratic parties (like the Finns Party and Danish People's Party) and classical liberal parties like Norway's Progress Party. Most of the parties (apart from those on the further left and to the right) don't seem to want radical change.

The Danish People's Party is a very social democratic party, in the old sense of the term. But it's also quite nationalistic and conservative - they like their currency and their flag. It is EU sceptic, although mostly not to the point of leaving the EU like we are in UKIP.

There are other parties in Denmark that look interesting, but most seem fairly middle of the road and dull - though the influence of unrepresentative smaller parties like the Social Liberals does seem a big worry. They have no MEPs and only have a tiny, tiny share of the seats on regional and municipal politics.

Here is an advertisement they put out in 2011 (in English):

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BlA9Tj2yGb4[/youtube]

If this is true (the bolded/highlighted text), how come the Red-Green Alliance Party virtually has NO SAY in the running of the politics of Denmark?
It wasn't invited or only formally invited, to the discussions of the larger reforms of the welfare.

They are ignored completely.

The truth is that the Social-Democrats are collaborating with the traitorous party of Venstre, this extreme right wing fascist party, with Søren Pind and Karsten Lauritzen, holding 19th century political conservative opinions about how the weakest and worst off members of society should be treated.

They want to revert the Danish welfare society back to the 19th century.

The Conservative Party and Liberal Alliance Party wants to abolish it altogether and revert our society back to the 18th century with landlords and serfdom.

The current Fleksjob- and Cash Assistance (Kontanthjælp) reforms are exactly this: SERFDOM! It is slavery. The Fleksjobbers and the Unemployed on Kontanthjælp now has less rights than ordinary employees. The "Social Economic Factories" is just another word for Workhouse. So is the "Nyttejob" (another word for slavery).

Denmark is using Autists as slaves!

Call the men in white coats.

Because the Red-Green Alliance Party is the leftmost party in parliament. It would need to have an absolute majority to hold the 90th mandate, or the parties would have to arrange themselves dramatically across new ideological lines for this party to be pivotal in any major political decisions.

This is also why the recent electoral gains of the Red-Green Alliance has not translated into political influence, as they can only be part of a leftwing government coalition.

Ugh, yeah, I hate it when minorities cobble together enough votes to elect someone who represents their ideals. If only there was some kind of solution to this lack of unity. A final one, perhaps.