Page 1 of 1 [ 3 posts ] 

Mootoo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Oct 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,942
Location: over the rainbow

06 Jul 2016, 8:36 pm

So, apparently people who throw something like sulfuric or other other corrosive substances gets about 5 years... this, of course, has no effect on the possibilities of getting one's hands on that kind of substance. Some are used legitimately, but other than legislation tackling employers (Control of Substances Hazardous to Health 2002) there is very little otherwise seemingly. Nitrate acid seems to be regulated, but sulphuric acid is only 'reportable'. So, indeed, humanity doesn't mind the use of acid to permanently disfigure and otherwise utterly destroy someone else's life... but not for the subjective self to experience the universe and other such fractal imagery. Even the UN lists such substances *in order* to stop them getting used as precursors. Having a charred face is seriously less alarming than popping a pill?



shlaifu
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 May 2014
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,659

11 Jul 2016, 12:47 pm

in a "war on drugs" scenario, yes-
you should also assume that it takes quite the amount of acid to scar a face, yet you can make and sell a lot of an illegal substance with relatively small amounts of ingredients.
also, acid attacks a RAREin this part of the world.


_________________
I can read facial expressions. I did the test.


naturalplastic
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Aug 2010
Age: 71
Gender: Male
Posts: 35,189
Location: temperate zone

11 Jul 2016, 3:29 pm

If you outlaw corrosive acid then only outlaws will have corrosive acid!