Nazi-wannabe claims love is "cultural marxist propaganda"

Post Reply New Topic

This isn't even fiction, or at least I try to see how someone can have such absurd convictions. Perhaps if one has never been in a relationship, but if there is a factor to any of them it's surely randomness, and no amount of propaganda of whichever politics can surely somehow conjure up a partner. Or, perhaps, considering the context, it's the kind of 'new' politics in the states where they think partners are spoils of war. The kind of people who'd advocate for rape, but only if it happens to match the melatonin.

Scroll up a little and put that in context. The poster said, earlier, that different races want to live apart. Another poster says, then why are there so many interracial marriages/relationships/children. The reply was that it was due to "cultural marxist propaganda" that promotes race-mixing. That said, it should be noted that there is a lot of overlap between the "alt-right" and the "manosphere", the latter being a loosely organized movement of "involuntary celibates" who sit in their parents' basements all day and whine to the internetz that no woman will have sex with them, even going so far as to say that women should be FORCED to have sex with them.

Even for all the years I was alone, I was never that pathetic.

I know this is an A.S. forum, but I'd just like to say that this is another barely coherent post from you. Every sentence is a mess.

What Skysaw said.

Do us all a favor please.

1) Re read this post you made.

2) Take a piece of paper, and list for yourself each of the many points you trying to cram into this post.

3) Then post it again, but with you making each of your points in a separate simple declarative sentence.

That way folks from Planet Earth can follow WTF you are talking about.

Are you capable of doing that?

I agree with the two previous posters. I sometimes think, when I read the title of one of your threads: "Now, THIS might be something I can sink my teeth into" (enjoy reading / debating); but, it's too much work, to try and figure-out what you're talking about. People have brought this to your attention, before----and, STILL you don't take care, with your writing. I'm thinking you would get WAAAAAAY more responses, if people could figure-out what you are saying.

Perhaps I exaggerated a little, and I’m conscious I wasn’t being very helpful, and thanks to the link Mootoo provided we can get some idea of what he’s talking about. I still find his post confusing though.

Mootoo, let me try to make sense of your post, sentence by sentence.

Ok, I can see where you’re coming from here, even if I find your way of expressing it a bit unusual. You are telling us you are trying to see how anyone can make the claim quoted in your thread title, and you are assuring us (with the help of a link) that you are not making it up. Fine.



Do you mean perhaps if one has never been in a relationship one might believe (like the person in the Economist comments thread) that cultural marxist propaganda was responsible for interracial relationships? Or do you mean perhaps if one has never been in a relationship (and only then) one might let political propaganda influence one’s choice of a partner? I assume the former, but it’s not clear.

What is the ‘them’ you are referring to? I assume ‘relationships’ (all relationships), but again it’s not clear.

So you’re saying the main factor influencing which relationships form is randomness, and political propaganda cannot conjure up a partner for someone. But nobody ever claimed that it could. The claim made on the thread was that the values a person internalizes from the surrounding society makes them more or less inclined to form relationships with certain people.



Now I’m getting quite confused. I assume the context you are referring to is the context of a thread about the alt-right. So I assume you are wondering out loud if DerRichter from the Economist comments thread is one of these ‘alt-right’ people who think partners are spoils of war.

If so, I don’t know where you get the idea that that is a common belief on the alt-right, but more to the point, how would DerRichter’s post on interracial relationships tie in with his possible belief that partners are spoils of war? What connection are you trying to make here?



Now I think I’m totally lost. I’ll ignore the syntax here and assume you are writing as you might talk. ‘Only if it happens to match the melatonin’ you say? Only if what happens to match the melatonin? And what melatonin where? Do you mean melanin?

Are the kind of people you are talking about the kind of people who advocate raping women of their own race (and only women of their own race)? Or are they the kind of people who advocate raping women of other races (and only women of other races)? If the first kind, where on earth do you find these types of people? If the second kind, do you really see anyone on the alt-right or anywhere else actually openly advocating for this? And, again, what does this have to do with DerRichter’s post?