Page 1 of 1 [ 3 posts ] 

pawelk1986
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Apr 2010
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,903
Location: Wroclaw, Poland

02 Jan 2019, 10:33 pm

Do those cops do the right thing by resorting to using their guns?

As you know I'm from Poland in my country people often complain about our police that they did not intervene if someone broke the law that they should be like the coops from USA or Russia use guns more often but when they did they are an outcry about police brutality :-)

What do you think about this coops?



goldfish21
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Feb 2013
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 22,612
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada

13 Jan 2019, 5:19 pm

I think they were in the right to fire the first time(s) as he was a threat to them, threw a weapon towards them, and continued to challenge them. Cops can't take chances that someone MIGHT NOT kill them. If you're an actual threat to a cop who has their gun drawn on you, cops are trained to shoot to kill in response. I'm surprised they fired warning shots instead of just shooting him in the chest tbh. Seems they went against their likely training and were compassionate, trying to let him live.

But after he had turned to run away from them? They shot him in the back.. he was no longer a threat to their lives. That would likely be considered excessive force and the cop who shot him could even face criminal charges for shooting him.

So, IMO, the cops went from in the right to shoot to kill to in the wrong because the guy was no longer a threat to them when they shot him.


_________________
No :heart: for supporting trump. Because doing so is deplorable.


Kiprobalhato
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Mar 2014
Age: 29
Gender: Female
Posts: 29,119
Location: מתחת לעננים

13 Jan 2019, 6:10 pm

shouldn't have killed him.


_________________
הייתי צוללת עכשיו למים
הכי, הכי עמוקים
לא לשמוע כלום
לא לדעת כלום
וזה הכל אהובי, זה הכל.