It is wrong because it involves judging a person based on what others do, not what that individual does and who they are.
Are Barack Obama, Bill Cosby, Richard Steele, and Allen Keyes six times more likely to break into your house and kill you than the average white person? Obviously not. Those people are so famous that they get judged more on who they are than on their skin color or the geographic location of their ancestors. We know such famous people enough to develop a predictive model of their behavior based on who they are, not based on the characteristics of a group of individuals that share some trait (skin color).
Further, you are confusing race and culture. Chinese and Japanese cultures place more value on civility and politeness than western cultures, but when an Asian person is raised outside these cultures (or rejects them), then they are no different than any other person. In this case, race is somewhat correlated with public behavior, but only because race is a marker for culture.
Is it OK for employers to develop crude stereotypes of Aspies, and then apply that to all people who have Asperger's syndrome? Is it OK to say "Once, I met a guy with asperger's, and he was a total moron, not to be trusted, irresponsible, flaky, etc ... so I won't consider hiring an aspie, and the statistical data shows that these people are not worth considering." ?? That is not racism, but it is the same type of prejudicial stereotyping that racism is also a part of ... don't judge the person based on the facts, just pre-judge them based on categories and assumptions about people in those categories.
Last edited by monty on 18 May 2009, 11:24 am, edited 1 time in total.