How can people be so brutal with refugees, really?

Page 5 of 8 [ 120 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next

trayder
Toucan
Toucan

User avatar

Joined: 15 Aug 2015
Age: 1950
Posts: 280
Location: New Zealand

08 Sep 2015, 5:59 am

syzygyish wrote:
Mootoo wrote:
I'm so sick of the news... I keep listening, despite of the horror, and yet am astonished when I happen to notice how many neo-Nazis are seemingly popping up out of nowhere.

It's like, literally, Germany and the UK changed sides from WWII... the former has taken the most refugees, the UK is on the brink of suggesting concentration camps for them. (No, I seriously wouldn't be surprised if this 'Eton' cabinet suggests it... ugh... and no one can suggest that this isn't a brutal consensus when children are dying in the back of some truck and left to rot...)

I too am completely disgusted!

The problem is politics
In my country, Australia
a politician (John Howard) came to power by absolutely stripping all refugees of humanity
he lied to the voting public and won another election
(the infamous Tampa incident)

now, both sides of politics are agreeing on the harshest measures towards refugees,
in order to secure votes.

By sowing fear into the voting public

who live at ease

and have nothing to fear

but what politicians tell them!

:cry:


This is not a good planet to be on at the moment with our senses as they are. Incompetent governments, a blood thirsty populace who are self centred or deluded and a social system which at best keeps them from tearing each others throats with baubles and trinkets.



kazanscube
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2015
Gender: Male
Posts: 26,180

22 Sep 2015, 2:12 pm

I'm going to take my time to address this particular post as I've read it. Basically, from what I gather many European countries have become disenchanted with taking in such large number of refugees. Mind you, The people whom are entering these various nation are not necessarily individuals whom simply wish to leach of the government welfare systems though, on an honest level there probably is a certain percentage of such people however, I don't think all migrants would come under that classification in literal means. I have a friend of mien whom spoke of a time when Germany had taken in a large number of migrants from Turkey and for the most part it was a positive result both in terms of labor force and said persons helping themselves to integrate into their new homeland society as such. Yes, there are people whom sometimes flee from one place to another and once they have settled into a new place they make absolutely no attempt at integration whatsoever.

Therefore, one really has to look at this difficult issue from both sides and try to find meaningful & sound decisions as how to address the many problems faced by such a crisis.


_________________
I'm an extremely vulnerable person. Vulnerability and emotion are very closely linked.


Inventor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Feb 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,014
Location: New Orleans

24 Sep 2015, 5:09 am

I have lost track of what this thread was about.

In Africa refugees go to an air base with UN troops to protect them. Not getting shot, being given food, is good.

There does seem to be some problems with the USA recently giving a half billion, and the EU a billion, to the refugee camps in Turkey, Lebanon, Jordan. What I heard before that was rations were being cut because the UN lacked funds.

The last four years seem to be little support for refugees. Now that millions are walking to Europe, people think about life in the camps.

There are many places outside the war zone where people could go, if they had support. Going all the way to Germany or Sweden does seem to be welfare shopping.

A failure to create a reasonable alternative, and some dumb German saying we will take 800,000, lead to this situation.

Also American and British support of moderate murders in Syria. Assad was supposed to fall this would all be done in six months, Joe Biden's son would be head of the Oil Company.

Not only is there a wave heading to Europe, Russia has showed up big time, air and ground, and non Assad factions are about to get mowed. That is going to put a lot of new people on the path to anywhere else. Russia does know how to hunt terrorists.

Russia is known to hunt them down even if they flee to another country.

There are hundreds of Russian speakers in ISIS, and Russia wants to be sure they do not return to Russia.

To be clear, Russia will hunt and kill them wherever they go.

A land without borders leads to a war without borders.



whatamess
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Aug 2007
Age: 58
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,284

28 Sep 2015, 5:26 pm

I am always amused when people feel that all the problems of the world are caused by the evil Americans and Europeans. It seems every country with issues only has issues because of them. I live in a country where that is the view. Funny, there is PLENTY of blame to go around here...mostly with the locals and their messed up, no law applies to me, you owe me, I deserve mentality...soon they'll be asking for handouts from others and messing up yet another country. Sorry, but at some point you need to stay in your country and try to fix it. I can assure you that while SOME who leave their country are decent human beings, MANY who leave are actually part of the reason their country is in such a mess. You'll see. Wait 10 years and you'll be banging your heads.



trayder
Toucan
Toucan

User avatar

Joined: 15 Aug 2015
Age: 1950
Posts: 280
Location: New Zealand

29 Sep 2015, 7:05 pm

The forces that govern all our lives are objective....Adam Smith referred to them as the unseen hand, Karl Marx, material dialcticism. These forces we term capitalism.

They include a borderless global market and demographic portability. These two have been with us ever since the first major demographic wave saw European refugees take new lands and will continue until the world is fully capitalist.

No amount of hand wringing can stop or slow these forces down, not even attempts to set them back in places such as the Middle East with strong resistance such as ISIS and Al Qaeda. People will adapt to serve the system as the system compels it.



Joe90
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Feb 2010
Gender: Female
Posts: 26,492
Location: UK

12 Nov 2015, 9:21 am

OK, please let me get this off my chest.

I'm totally against letting tens of thousands of Syrians into the UK. The UK is extremely overpopulated as it is, and foreign people are coming first before us British. The British feel so unimportant - in our own country.

Everybody I speak to says the same thing.

No disrespect for foreign people, whether they are Eastern European or Syrian refugees, they are all people and the general population of them are good people. But, things can only go so far. I mean, Syria should sort itself out.

Also, I've read somewhere, and heard on the news, that the UK are going to give refugees health benefits, new homes and thousands of jobs are going to go to them. So, what about us British? In most other countries, like Australia and the USA, you can't just walk into their country and expect to be given a home, a job and benefits, without having lots and lots of your own money behind you. So why is the UK letting so many people from other countries come to the UK and take up homes, jobs and tax-payer's money?

I mean, me and my brother are suffering from anxiety issues and my brother has severe depression. He is 28 but still living at home, has tried and tried to help himself, tried looking for a new (better paid) job, wants to move out, and has been phoning up for support, but nobody wants to help, and he gets turned down job after job. But a Syrian family can come to the UK, and just get given a home and jobs, just like that. It is so unfair. And don't say us British ''aren't trying hard enough'' because we ARE.

Some people, eg Muslims, get offended by our English culture, but if us British people say anything about any foreign people, we are the racist ones. But it is not racist. British people should have more rights to free speech when we are in our own country. Can't anybody see this? I suppose the rich British folk don't understand, but let's get an average-class British person on this thread and they will agree with everything I have said in this post.

Sorry but it's just realistic. The UK used to be one of the best countries to live in. The older generation have watched the UK go downhill ever since the late 80's/early 90's, and it noticeably went downhill since early to mid-2000's.


_________________
Female


Sweetleaf
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Age: 36
Gender: Female
Posts: 35,278
Location: Somewhere in Colorado

12 Nov 2015, 11:14 am

Because supposedly every last one of them is an islamic terrorist or at least a terrorist waiting to happen. I can of course understand frusteration that the U.S isn't doing more to help the refugees considering the U.S has had a major role in creating the whole damn crisis in the middle east....and frusteration that instead they just push it on the rest of the world. But yes the hate directed specifically at the refugees themselves is certainly disturbing, almost like its becoming almost expected to view them as sub-human garbage or something.


_________________
Tis the time to melt the Ice.


Sweetleaf
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Age: 36
Gender: Female
Posts: 35,278
Location: Somewhere in Colorado

12 Nov 2015, 11:22 am

Joe90 wrote:
OK, please let me get this off my chest.

I'm totally against letting tens of thousands of Syrians into the UK. The UK is extremely overpopulated as it is, and foreign people are coming first before us British. The British feel so unimportant - in our own country.

Everybody I speak to says the same thing.

No disrespect for foreign people, whether they are Eastern European or Syrian refugees, they are all people and the general population of them are good people. But, things can only go so far. I mean, Syria should sort itself out.

Also, I've read somewhere, and heard on the news, that the UK are going to give refugees health benefits, new homes and thousands of jobs are going to go to them. So, what about us British? In most other countries, like Australia and the USA, you can't just walk into their country and expect to be given a home, a job and benefits, without having lots and lots of your own money behind you. So why is the UK letting so many people from other countries come to the UK and take up homes, jobs and tax-payer's money?

I mean, me and my brother are suffering from anxiety issues and my brother has severe depression. He is 28 but still living at home, has tried and tried to help himself, tried looking for a new (better paid) job, wants to move out, and has been phoning up for support, but nobody wants to help, and he gets turned down job after job. But a Syrian family can come to the UK, and just get given a home and jobs, just like that. It is so unfair. And don't say us British ''aren't trying hard enough'' because we ARE.

Some people, eg Muslims, get offended by our English culture, but if us British people say anything about any foreign people, we are the racist ones. But it is not racist. British people should have more rights to free speech when we are in our own country. Can't anybody see this? I suppose the rich British folk don't understand, but let's get an average-class British person on this thread and they will agree with everything I have said in this post.

Sorry but it's just realistic. The UK used to be one of the best countries to live in. The older generation have watched the UK go downhill ever since the late 80's/early 90's, and it noticeably went downhill since early to mid-2000's.


Well it sounds like your government needs to do a better job of not putting foreigners first as you put it. But realistically how do you expect Syria to just 'sort itself out' anytime soon. Also you acknowledge the refugees are just as much people as anyone else but what you suggest is impossible....if everyone flat out refuses any refugees then they will die, as they have nowhere to go and most have probably lost just about everything they had. I mean I can see the frusteration on your part but....thousands of people cant just be left to die, at least in my opinion. Honestly I don't see why the U.S isn't taking in any at least that I have heard of.


_________________
Tis the time to melt the Ice.


Joe90
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Feb 2010
Gender: Female
Posts: 26,492
Location: UK

12 Nov 2015, 11:39 am

Well the US isn't taking any refugees in because they believe in ''your own people come first''.

And how can the UK possibly take all these thousands of refugees in if there are already thousands, if not millions of Eastern European people here already? There clearly is no room, and the British will be just completely pushed to the side. I'm sorry, but I agree with America. Your own people come first. Sounds selfish yes, but it's how a society should be.

I'm sorry but the UK is in a terrible financial crisis as it is, with crappy government, and us British folk are getting really angry about the Syrian refugees. Some people even say that loads of refugees are becoming ''refugees'' on purpose, so that they can come to the UK and they know that they will just be given a house and benefits. I don't know if that's true or not, but I'm telling you, there is clearly no more room for refugees to come to the UK.

Pretty soon Britain won't be Britain any more, and it'd be all us British on the streets while all foreign people are living in houses. Pretty scary, and f****d up. But we will not be welcome to any other countries unless we are stinking rich.


_________________
Female


Revnant14
Hummingbird
Hummingbird

Joined: 29 Sep 2015
Posts: 18
Location: USA

12 Nov 2015, 11:56 am

Just want to add some data to clarify one point in the discussion.
-
America, for perhaps the last century, takes in more immigrants, legal and illegal, each year then any other country.
-
Since 2006 America has taken in each year more then the rest of the world combined. Estimated at 1-2 million each year.

(the situation has impacted Europe because that is where the refugees are physically heading, with Germany and Sweden being the most sought after destination because of those countries immigration laws. Obama recently pledged to take 10,000 of the refugees this year, and I think 100,000 in 2016)



Sweetleaf
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Age: 36
Gender: Female
Posts: 35,278
Location: Somewhere in Colorado

12 Nov 2015, 12:07 pm

Joe90 wrote:
Well the US isn't taking any refugees in because they believe in ''your own people come first''.

And how can the UK possibly take all these thousands of refugees in if there are already thousands, if not millions of Eastern European people here already? There clearly is no room, and the British will be just completely pushed to the side. I'm sorry, but I agree with America. Your own people come first. Sounds selfish yes, but it's how a society should be.

I'm sorry but the UK is in a terrible financial crisis as it is, with crappy government, and us British folk are getting really angry about the Syrian refugees. Some people even say that loads of refugees are becoming ''refugees'' on purpose, so that they can come to the UK and they know that they will just be given a house and benefits. I don't know if that's true or not, but I'm telling you, there is clearly no more room for refugees to come to the UK.

Pretty soon Britain won't be Britain any more, and it'd be all us British on the streets while all foreign people are living in houses. Pretty scary, and f****d up. But we will not be welcome to any other countries unless we are stinking rich.


It would seem rather the belief is your own who are wealthy come first, here in the U.S...either way considering the U.S being quite a bit at fault for all the crisis in the middle east, I'd think the U.S kind of have a responsibility to help rectify this refugee situation. Also I hardly think the U.K alone should take in all the refugees...nor do I think it would even be realistic to expect that I mean there are already people in the U.K that need to be considered as well as availability of resources.

Also the refugees are people fleeing from war-torn lands, of course it is easier to have hate towards them if people believe the vast majority are just 'faking' refugee status to get 'free stuff'....but that really just invalidates the entire struggle.

Of course people in a given country should come first....but that doesn't really justify entirely ignoring the issue. I mean are you ok with thousands of people being left to die if every country were to say 'no refugees'? Now limited amounts makes sense but even with putting citizens first its not immoral to help refugees in crisis. But yeah it sounds like the U.K really doesn't have the ability to take anymore without it causing a lot of problems.....which is understandable.

It is a hard issue no matter how you slice it, and I know the U.S is not taking the sort of responsibility it should for destabilizing the middle east so badly.


_________________
Tis the time to melt the Ice.


LoveNotHate
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Oct 2013
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,195
Location: USA

12 Nov 2015, 12:29 pm

The developing world is suppose to add 1.2 billion people in the next fifteen years alone, and many more billions in the next 60 years.

Syrian refugees are a pebble in the ocean.

There will be pressure to move billions of African and Asian people into Europe.



BuyerBeware
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Sep 2011
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,476
Location: PA, USA

12 Nov 2015, 12:51 pm

Bluntly put, we're afraid of them.

It isn't really about "How many ISIS are hiding in the ranks of refugees??" Oh, yes, there's that to fear...

But the real fear is much, much larger.

Cultural flux is the story of human history. Waves of refugees (one wonders what all those people that crossed the Bering Strait land bridge were running from), waves of conquerors... It's basically all the same thing. They come, they bring their culture with them.

And no one wants to lose their culture. Conquerors get to force theirs on the conquered. Refugees try to hang onto theirs, while hosts feel threatened by that, and naturally so. Because cultural flux happens, and no one wants to lose their culture.

Dominant groups (America and Western Europe) have even more to lose. Not just culture, but primacy. That's even scarier.

My suggestion?? Cultural flux is the story of human history. Either be kind, extend a hand, learn the language, and flow with it...

...or stop pussyfooting around, build walls, and openly declare that you're willing to kill old women and little kids.

Make peace. Or make war. One way or the other, stop f*****g around.


_________________
"Alas, our dried voices when we whisper together are quiet and meaningless, as wind in dry grass, or rats' feet over broken glass in our dry cellar." --TS Eliot, "The Hollow Men"


naturalplastic
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Aug 2010
Age: 71
Gender: Male
Posts: 35,189
Location: temperate zone

12 Nov 2015, 1:03 pm

LoveNotHate wrote:
The developing world is suppose to add 1.2 billion people in the next fifteen years alone, and many more billions in the next 60 years.

Syrian refugees are a pebble in the ocean.


This.

Folks talk about Syria likes it the dog, and that the rest of the world is the tail. They have no sense of how things compare to each other.

China is one of the slowest growing countries in the developing world and it adds more people to its population each 15 months than Syria even HAD its WHOLE population on the eve of its civil war !

India also adds a whole country of Syria to its population every couple of years. I dont mean that it adds the subset of Syrians who have become refugees, I mean that it adds the entire 21 million population of Syria to its population every couple of years.

If the US took in say 100 thousand Syrians we could just deport one percent of the eleven million illegal aliens that we already have here to make up the difference.

OR, we could not deport anyone, and just live with a one percent increase in the number uninvited guests that we already have, and we probably wouldnt even notice the difference.



eric76
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Aug 2012
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,660
Location: In the heart of the dust bowl

12 Nov 2015, 2:02 pm

Put them in camps, keep the gates closed, and when it becomes safe in their country, send them back.



Joe90
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Feb 2010
Gender: Female
Posts: 26,492
Location: UK

12 Nov 2015, 4:33 pm

I think there should be some sort of camps they can go to, whether it's in the UK or Germany or anywhere, where they are warm and fed and everything, and are given work to do inside the camp, like farming or whatever, and no torture, and the children are safe and even schooled. It won't be the best education or the best housing, but it will at least keep them safe, warm and fed until it is safe to go back to their own country. OK this may cost the UK or whatever other countries they go to money still because of food and stuff, but it won't be as bad as them taking over our economy and leaving no room for us British people. It will be the fairest thing to do.

OK I am probably being unrealistic, but there are braindead pricks that run this country and seem to think that everybody's rich just because they are, and that everybody on job-seekers can find a job within a week even though more and more foreign people are entering the UK each month and are taking up all the jobs. When I went in Tesco the other day, nearly all the workers I saw and heard were foreign, and I've been applying endlessly to Tesco and just get turned down each time.


_________________
Female