cyberdad wrote:
kraftiekortie wrote:
If it turns out he actually "faked a hate crime," I feel like he should be punished rather severely.
There is the question of his mental state. People like to crucify the mentally ill.
Gosh. You are DETERMINED to make Smollett into a martyr, arent you?
By hook, or by crook.
You tried race, and you tried sexual orientation, and now you're telling us that he is being nailed to the cross for all the sins that we all have commited against the mentally ill?
Why dont you just go to the Pope and ask the Pope to canonize St. Jussie as a new literal Martyred saint of the Catholic church?
============================
What the word "insane" means in law is not quite the same as what it means in clinical science. And they are both not quite the same as in common usage. The issues get murky here. In some sense he probably is "mentally ill". Otherwise he wouldnt have done this hoax.
The deadpan comedian Richard Wright quipped "i got a parking ticket. I plead insanity".
Smollett is not John Hinckley (facing the death penalty, or facing hard time for life) because he shot a POTUS.
He is more like Richard Wright. Facing a small penalty for a smaller crime. So its kinda laughable to plead insanity to protect him.
But even if his lawyers, or fans (like you), are to invoke insanity, then he would have to own up and admit that he perpetrated the(admittedly insane, and inane) crime first. You cant have it both ways- insist that he didnt do it, AND insist that he is "not guilty by reason of insanity".
Last edited by naturalplastic on 22 Mar 2022, 3:14 am, edited 1 time in total.