ZenDen wrote:
I agree with much of what you say but your comments forgiving police brutality (gassing innocent people for example) are uninformed.
Police are allowed a lot of discretion but they knew this riot was coming. Police are trained in riot (not protest) control, so by not being trained properly, the first time someone throws something they react as though the entire crowd is made up of rioters instead of merely upset protesters, and thereby deprived the legal protesters of their civil right to protest. And you dismiss this by saying "It seems like if everyone gets home ok, then that should be taken as a success, even if people were gassed that didn't deserve it."?????????
Untrained and unsupervised police are nothing more than a mob themselves. I've personally seen uniformed police smash teenage girls and boys in the face with their truncheons as the police went out of control. There is no excuse for this brutality and the fact police departments in many locations allow this is unconscionable.
Police abuse of citizen's rights is a topic in almost every news outlet. Something needs to be done soon.
Rant over.
Not really. As soon as something is thrown from the protesting site, the peaceful protest stops being that -- it doesn't matter if it was only 1 person out of 100. People have the right to protest peacefully, and the police have the right to not have things thrown at them -- if something comes from the crowd, then the police are justified in responding to the crowd (law states that it's no longer a peaceful assembly); they give a warning for the crowd to leave after they have thrown something, and when people don't, that's when CS and other theatrics are used. People obviously don't know the laws regarding this, which the police follow -- it's actually the fault of the legislative branch if someone doesn't like it. You might not agree with this, and see it as a form of collective punishment, but the police are following the law -- if they don't, then they're not doing their job.
I'm not dismissing it. If everyone gets to go home, and the worst people experience is a dose of CS [after the protest becomes unruly due to something being thrown], then that's pretty good. The response used today has been tailored over years of trial and error for dispersing a crowd in a way that doesn't cause physical contact (other than arrests). It's a far cry from the old days, which doesn't justify any abuse now, of course. If CS clears out the troublemakers within the crowd and the crowd itself, then so be it. I don't think that's abuse at all -- people should stop those in their midst from throwing things.
I'm also not dismissing actual abuse -- yes, hitting someone is wrong (as long as they were obeying the police after several warnings and weren't refusing to move, and even then, direct hitting shouldn't be used; pushing is fine though). If people are abused, then the abuser can be charged/punished. It happened during the first riots in Ferguson (one of the officers pointing the muzzle of his rifle at people).
We're talking of Ferguson, right? From all I've seen, they've behaved professional within their areas of responsibility (apart from some individuals, such as the rifle pointing; he was punished for that). The main problem being there's not enough of them to cover the entire area.