Massive earthquake, aftershocks rattle Chile

Page 2 of 3 [ 35 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

Mainichi
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 8 Aug 2009
Age: 46
Gender: Female
Posts: 461
Location: Texas

27 Feb 2010, 5:22 pm

pbcoll wrote:
What I find striking is how little damage there was given it was an 8.8 quake (orders of magnitude bigger than that in Haiti). I suspect the Chileans have some of the best civil engineers in the world (or the strictest building codes). My sympathies to anyone affected.


Chile has some the strictest building codes. Ever since the 1960 9.5 earthquake, they largest earthquake in history they became serious about earthquakes. Chile is a lot more prepared for earthquakes then Haiti is. Chile has had 8 eathquakes of 7+ in Magnitude since the 1960 one, including the one today.

The Tsunami just hit hilo with 3 foot waves so far.



Tim_Tex
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Jul 2004
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 46,691
Location: Houston, Texas

28 Feb 2010, 1:18 am

MissConstrue wrote:
Could only mean one thing....


((((Global Warming))))


Global warming doesn't apply to earthquakes and tsunamis. Earthquakes are caused by pressure from under the earth's surface being released, and the magnitude of the earthquake depends on how much pressure is being released, and the type of seismic fault involved.


_________________
Who’s better at math than a robot? They’re made of math!


Last edited by Tim_Tex on 28 Feb 2010, 1:25 am, edited 1 time in total.

Tim_Tex
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Jul 2004
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 46,691
Location: Houston, Texas

28 Feb 2010, 1:21 am

pbcoll wrote:
What I find striking is how little damage there was given it was an 8.8 quake (orders of magnitude bigger than that in Haiti). I suspect the Chileans have some of the best civil engineers in the world (or the strictest building codes). My sympathies to anyone affected.


Chile also has a top-notch emergency management/response system, which is why only 200-300 people have died so far.


_________________
Who’s better at math than a robot? They’re made of math!


mjs82
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Jun 2005
Age: 44
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,166

28 Feb 2010, 2:32 am

Mainichi wrote:
pbcoll wrote:
What I find striking is how little damage there was given it was an 8.8 quake (orders of magnitude bigger than that in Haiti). I suspect the Chileans have some of the best civil engineers in the world (or the strictest building codes). My sympathies to anyone affected.


Chile has some the strictest building codes. Ever since the 1960 9.5 earthquake, they largest earthquake in history they became serious about earthquakes. Chile is a lot more prepared for earthquakes then Haiti is. Chile has had 8 eathquakes of 7+ in Magnitude since the 1960 one, including the one today.

The Tsunami just hit hilo with 3 foot waves so far.


Their earthquake and progressive collapse codes are second to none. I went to see a Chilean professor once give a lecture on blast damage.



Nan
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Mar 2006
Age: 70
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,795

28 Feb 2010, 9:38 am

I wish ours were as good! Or even half as good. When the San Andreas (or whichever one) finally ruptures, there will be one hell of a mess.

I, personally, (sorry Merle) think it'll be the Cascadia Subduction Zone that goes first here, tho.



phil777
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 May 2008
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,825
Location: Montreal, Québec

28 Feb 2010, 11:58 am

Chile still has the whole West Coast all to themselves! :p



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 89
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

28 Feb 2010, 2:07 pm

Tim_Tex wrote:

Chile also has a top-notch emergency management/response system, which is why only 200-300 people have died so far.


Chile is not Haiti.

ruveyn



raisedbyignorance
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Apr 2009
Age: 42
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,225
Location: Indiana

01 Mar 2010, 11:50 am

Okay, so now that we know that earthquake can happen ANYWHERE, I dont see why more nations aren't making a bigger effort to earthquake proof their buildings. Japan and Chile have building restrictions for this because they're so earthquake prone, but now with big earthquakes happening in unusual places like China and Haiti, you'd think people would start paying attention now.



0_equals_true
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Apr 2007
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,038
Location: London

01 Mar 2010, 12:25 pm

MissConstrue wrote:
Could only mean one thing....


((((Global Warming))))

Earthquakes have absolutely zilch to do with climate change. Think about it for a second...



pbcoll
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Feb 2007
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,892
Location: the City of Palaces

01 Mar 2010, 7:13 pm

ruveyn wrote:
Tim_Tex wrote:

Chile also has a top-notch emergency management/response system, which is why only 200-300 people have died so far.


Chile is not Haiti.

ruveyn


True, Chile is per capita the wealthiest country in Latin America, and Haiti is the poorest country in the Western Hemisphere. However I think many First World cities would be reduced to piles of rubble if hit by an 8.8 earthquake. I think the reasons why Chile has coped so much better than Haiti with an earthquake 500 times as powerful as that which hit Haiti are essentially the same ones why Chile is so much more prosperous than Haiti.


_________________
I am the steppenwolf that never learned to dance. (Sedaka)

El hombre es una bestia famélica, envidiosa e insaciable. (Francisco Tario)

I'm male by the way (yes, I know my avatar is misleading).


Inventor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Feb 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,014
Location: New Orleans

03 Mar 2010, 2:42 am

Yep. Global Warming.

One Degree causes the surface to swell, and it has to go somewhere.

A millimeter per kilometer adds up.

That wet part of the Pacific Plate that just slid under is now cooking up a volcano.

Volcanos shoot out ash, that blocks sunlight, and cools thing off.

It is a self regulating system.



Barbary
Tufted Titmouse
Tufted Titmouse

User avatar

Joined: 25 Feb 2010
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 41

03 Mar 2010, 10:44 am

Apparently this earthquake changed the rotation of the earth, so now our days will for ever be 1.26 milliseconds shorter than before.



phil777
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 May 2008
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,825
Location: Montreal, Québec

03 Mar 2010, 11:21 am

Last news, burglaries are going on in Chile or at least its biggest towns. =/



ADoyle
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Dec 2005
Age: 50
Gender: Female
Posts: 913
Location: Southern California, USA

03 Mar 2010, 5:13 pm

Barbary wrote:
Apparently this earthquake changed the rotation of the earth, so now our days will for ever be 1.26 milliseconds shorter than before.


When I read that, my reaction was "Awesome!" It just shows how powerful earthquakes can be, which is something to remember as I'm in southern California which has the part of the San Andreas fault that is overdue for an 8 quake. That, and there are many smaller earthquake faults that can cause a 6 or 7 quake at the most, and often, those run right through urban areas like downtown Los Angeles. I'm not too concerned about a tsunami because I'm inland, with high ground between me and the ocean, plus my city has a breakwater that protects the port and local beach.


_________________
"I do not feel obliged to believe that the same God who has endowed us with sense, reason,
and intellect has intended us to forgo their use."
- Galileo Galilei


Barbary
Tufted Titmouse
Tufted Titmouse

User avatar

Joined: 25 Feb 2010
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 41

03 Mar 2010, 6:10 pm

ADoyle wrote:
Barbary wrote:
Apparently this earthquake changed the rotation of the earth, so now our days will for ever be 1.26 milliseconds shorter than before.


When I read that, my reaction was "Awesome!" It just shows how powerful earthquakes can be, which is something to remember as I'm in southern California which has the part of the San Andreas fault that is overdue for an 8 quake. That, and there are many smaller earthquake faults that can cause a 6 or 7 quake at the most, and often, those run right through urban areas like downtown Los Angeles. I'm not too concerned about a tsunami because I'm inland, with high ground between me and the ocean, plus my city has a breakwater that protects the port and local beach.


I hope not but probably one day a massive earthquake will hit California. It happened in 1907 and San Francisco was flattened.



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 89
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

03 Mar 2010, 8:13 pm

Barbary wrote:

I hope not but probably one day a massive earthquake will hit California. It happened in 1907 and San Francisco was flattened.


1906. And most of the damage was either fire damage or buildings being dynamited to serve as a fire break.

ruveyn