Hillary says Tulsi Gabbard and Jill Stein are Russian assets

Page 2 of 4 [ 50 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

ASPartOfMe
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Aug 2013
Age: 68
Gender: Male
Posts: 39,637
Location: Long Island, New York

22 Oct 2019, 6:07 am

Gabbard says she's open to 'face-to-face' meeting with Clinton, amid 'Russian asset' accusation

Quote:

Presidential candidate Tulsi Gabbard on Monday suggested that a "face-to-face" with Hillary Clinton might be an appropriate next step, as both Democratic and Republican politicians, including President Trump and Sen. Bernie Sanders, condemned Clinton's unfounded suggestion that the congresswoman is a secret Russian asset.

Speaking to reporters at an Iowa coffee shop, Gabbard, D-Hawaii, lamented that Clinton had pulled out of a planned appearance at Fortune’s Most Powerful Women Summit, where Gabbard is set to speak. Clinton was said to have abandoned the summit to avoid appearing with former Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen.

"Well, she had something to say about me, and I would have been very happy to have that conversation directly face-to-face with her," Gabbard said.

Earlier Monday, Sanders, I-Vt., joined fellow presidential candidates Andrew Yang, Marianne Williamson and Beto O'Rourke in defending Gabbard.

Tulsi Gabbard has put her life on the line to defend this country," Sanders tweeted, referring to Gabbard's overseas deployments. "People can disagree on issues, but it is outrageous for anyone to suggest that Tulsi is a foreign asset."

Asked for her reaction to Sanders' comment, Gabbard said only, "Thank you for speaking the truth."

Gabbard said she had not spoken with Sanders since last week's presidential primary debate.

Asked for her reaction to Sanders' comment, Gabbard said only, "Thank you for speaking the truth."

Gabbard said she had not spoken with Sanders since last week's presidential primary debate.

But, Gabbard reiterated to reporters Monday that she would commit to voting for the Democrats' eventual nominee, and would not run as a third-party candidate.

I've already said that many times," Gabbard said when asked if she'd stay with the Democrats instead of mounting a third-party bid.

Gabbard acknowledged that she had met with Trump when he was president-elect in order to discuss foreign policy, but insisted the discussions were not about any potential role in his administration. Gabbard also said she hadn't since talked to Trump about foreign policy.

"I was never offered a job," Gabbard said. That was not what is about. I was asked if I wanted to go and speak to the then-president-elect about foreign policy., and that's what I did."

Also Monday, Trump sounded a note of empathy for Gabbard, saying he had some familiarity with being accused of Russian collaboration without any evidence.

'I said, wait a minute, it took me two-and-a-half years, I wish [Clinton] would have said that earlier because people... have realized she is crazy. She’s crazy," the president told Fox News' Sean Hannity.

"She's accusing everyone of being a Russian agent," Trump told reporters, referring to Clinton. "She's not a Russian agent. These people are sick. There’s something wrong with them."

Trump added that he thought Clinton's substance-free accusations against Gabbard ultimately would help his own political chances in 2020.

Gabbard has asserted that Clinton was targeting her because Gabbard ended her tenure as vice chairwoman of the Democratic National Committee (DNC) in 2016 by quitting and throwing her support behind Sanders. At the time, Gabbard accused party leaders of stifling her freedom of speech and unfairly tipping the scales in favor of Clinton's presidential campaign.

People warned me in 2016 that my endorsement of Bernie Sanders would be the end of my 'political career' -- they said Clinton would never forget," Gabbard said a video posted on Twitter on Sunday, "that she and her rich and powerful friends -- her allies in politics and the media -- will make sure you're destroyed."

After a Clinton spokesperson all but confirmed Clinton was referring specifically to Gabbard as a "Russian asset," Gabbard fired back that Clinton was "queen of warmongers, embodiment of corruption, and personification of the rot that has sickened the Democratic Party!"


Word of advice to Hillary, In light of the last 3 years I can understand why you are upset you lost to The Donald. Instead of blaming Russia and everything under the kitchen sink look in the mirror. It is is a pretty good estate you live in so if you get bored there are other mirrors to look at yourself in. Also would you please kindly stop meddling in the 2020 election. Screw kindly, stay the f**k out.


_________________
“Self Acceptance is a process not a performance”
“You are autistic enough. And you always have been”

Professionally Identified and joined WP August 26, 2013
DSM 5: Autism Spectrum Disorder, DSM IV: Aspergers Moderate Severity.


JohnPowell
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Feb 2016
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,806
Location: Palestine

22 Oct 2019, 11:00 am

:mrgreen: here here


_________________
"No one believes more firmly than Comrade Napoleon that all animals are equal. He would be only too happy to let you make your decisions for yourselves. But sometimes you might make the wrong decisions, comrades, and then where should we be?"


EzraS
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Sep 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 27,828
Location: Twin Peaks

22 Oct 2019, 11:28 am

JohnPowell
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Feb 2016
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,806
Location: Palestine

22 Oct 2019, 5:30 pm

No wonder he is locked up. But Clinton is free of course.


_________________
"No one believes more firmly than Comrade Napoleon that all animals are equal. He would be only too happy to let you make your decisions for yourselves. But sometimes you might make the wrong decisions, comrades, and then where should we be?"


ASPartOfMe
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Aug 2013
Age: 68
Gender: Male
Posts: 39,637
Location: Long Island, New York

22 Jan 2020, 12:50 pm

Gabbard suing Clinton for defamation over 'Russian asset' comments

Quote:
Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (D-Hawaii) is suing Hillary Clinton for defamation over the former secretary of State's remarks on a podcast characterizing the Democratic presidential candidate as a Russian asset.

Gabbard filed the defamation lawsuit Wednesday in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.

Gabbard’s lawyers allege that Clinton’s comments have “smeared” Gabbard’s “political and personal reputation.”

“Tulsi Gabbard is a loyal American civil servant who has also dedicated her life to protecting the safety of all Americans,” Gabbard’s lawyer Brian Dunne said in a statement.

“Rep. Gabbard’s presidential campaign continues to gain momentum, but she has seen her political and personal reputation smeared and her candidacy intentionally damaged by Clinton’s malicious and demonstrably false remarks.”

Gabbard’s campaign referred all questions on the lawsuit to Dunne.

In response to the lawsuit, Clinton spokesman Nick Merrill said "that's ridiculous."

The lawsuit claims that Clinton is a “cutthroat politician” and “sought retribution” for Gabbard endorsing Clinton’s 2016 Democratic primary opponent, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.). Gabbard is now facing Sanders in the crowded 2020 Democratic primary.

“Clinton’s false assertions were made in a deliberate attempt to derail Tulsi’s presidential campaign,” it says.

Gabbard’s lawyers claim Clinton’s “peddling of this theory” has harmed Gabbard, voters and “American democracy.”

“Tulsi brings this lawsuit to ensure that the truth prevails and to ensure this country’s political elites are held accountable for intentionally trying to distort the truth in the midst of a critical Presidential election,” the lawsuit says.


_________________
“Self Acceptance is a process not a performance”
“You are autistic enough. And you always have been”

Professionally Identified and joined WP August 26, 2013
DSM 5: Autism Spectrum Disorder, DSM IV: Aspergers Moderate Severity.


vermontsavant
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 7 Dec 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,110
Location: Left WP forever

22 Jan 2020, 1:24 pm

VegetableMan wrote:
Hillary deserves an inoperable brain tumor.
Hillary Clinton is a form of cancer.


_________________
Forever gone
Sorry I ever joined


cyberdad
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Feb 2011
Age: 58
Gender: Male
Posts: 36,036

24 Jan 2020, 5:40 pm

According to people who know her in Hawaii

Early in her career, Gabbard took after her father. She opposed abortion and supported a constitutional amendment defining marriage as between a man and a woman. After Honolulu Magazine emailed her father to ask about his former ties to a conservative Hare Krishna splinter group for a 2004 profile, it was Gabbard who replied angrily, accusing the magazine of “acting as a conduit for The Honolulu Weekly and other homosexual extremist supporters of Ed Case [her father’s opponent].” The same year, she used her platform as a state representative to testify against civil unions, calling the claim that they were different from same-sex marriage “dishonest, cowardly, and extremely disrespectful to the people of Hawaii,” who had voted in favor of Constitutional Amendment 2 in 1998, empowering the legislature to withhold marriage from same-sex couples.


“As Democrats, we should be representing the views of the people, not a small number of homosexual extremists,” she said at the time.

Gabbard has since done a 180, citing her military service in the Middle East as the impetus for her conversion to social liberalism.

https://www.jacobinmag.com/2017/05/tuls ... atic-party



VegetableMan
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 11 Jun 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,208
Location: Illinois

24 Jan 2020, 6:09 pm

cyberdad wrote:
According to people who know her in Hawaii

Early in her career, Gabbard took after her father. She opposed abortion and supported a constitutional amendment defining marriage as between a man and a woman. After Honolulu Magazine emailed her father to ask about his former ties to a conservative Hare Krishna splinter group for a 2004 profile, it was Gabbard who replied angrily, accusing the magazine of “acting as a conduit for The Honolulu Weekly and other homosexual extremist supporters of Ed Case [her father’s opponent].” The same year, she used her platform as a state representative to testify against civil unions, calling the claim that they were different from same-sex marriage “dishonest, cowardly, and extremely disrespectful to the people of Hawaii,” who had voted in favor of Constitutional Amendment 2 in 1998, empowering the legislature to withhold marriage from same-sex couples.


“As Democrats, we should be representing the views of the people, not a small number of homosexual extremists,” she said at the time.

Gabbard has since done a 180, citing her military service in the Middle East as the impetus for her conversion to social liberalism.

https://www.jacobinmag.com/2017/05/tuls ... atic-party


What's your point?


_________________
What do you call a hot dog in a gangster suit?

Oscar Meyer Lansky


cyberdad
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Feb 2011
Age: 58
Gender: Male
Posts: 36,036

24 Jan 2020, 7:19 pm

My point is the democrats are justified in being suspicious about her long term motives.



VegetableMan
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 11 Jun 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,208
Location: Illinois

24 Jan 2020, 7:50 pm

cyberdad wrote:
My point is the democrats are justified in being suspicious about her long term motives.


Why, because she was religiously indoctrinated as a child? She's apologized for the views she held when she was still basically a child.

The corporate Dems attack her because she has the balls to take on the political establishment and corruption in government. You're indoctrinated too. You support these a**holes, without the slightest clue what you're supporting. Hopefully, you can shake that off someday.


_________________
What do you call a hot dog in a gangster suit?

Oscar Meyer Lansky


JohnPowell
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Feb 2016
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,806
Location: Palestine

24 Jan 2020, 8:42 pm

cyberdad wrote:
My point is the democrats are justified in being suspicious about her long term motives.


She's got a 100% record on human rights regarding homosexuals. The Democrats wanted Hillary f**king Clinton to be President. Now they want some freak pervert who grabs and kisses children. You are spewing the same tripe propaganda that is pushed out by the media companies that want to protect child rapists and put child grabbers and murderers into power. So do yourself a favour and shut the f**k up.


_________________
"No one believes more firmly than Comrade Napoleon that all animals are equal. He would be only too happy to let you make your decisions for yourselves. But sometimes you might make the wrong decisions, comrades, and then where should we be?"


cyberdad
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Feb 2011
Age: 58
Gender: Male
Posts: 36,036

27 Jan 2020, 12:34 am

It's funny John but I think neither of us can speak on behalf of the Democrats (you especially).

The democrats are the ones who pose the question about her trustworthiness; that was my point..



cyberdad
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Feb 2011
Age: 58
Gender: Male
Posts: 36,036

27 Jan 2020, 12:36 am

VegetableMan wrote:
cyberdad wrote:
My point is the democrats are justified in being suspicious about her long term motives.


Why, because she was religiously indoctrinated as a child? She's apologized for the views she held when she was still basically a child.

The corporate Dems attack her because she has the balls to take on the political establishment and corruption in government. You're indoctrinated too. You support these a**holes, without the slightest clue what you're supporting. Hopefully, you can shake that off someday.


Are you also wearing John Powell's rose coloured glasses?

For the second time - my point is that the majority of the democrats don't trust her...it's got nothing to do with me...



JohnPowell
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Feb 2016
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,806
Location: Palestine

27 Jan 2020, 12:46 pm

cyberdad wrote:
It's funny John but I think neither of us can speak on behalf of the Democrats (you especially).

The democrats are the ones who pose the question about her trustworthiness; that was my point..


You don't have any point. The Democrats and Republicans are in the moral sewer. They cheated Sanders out last time and then worked with the FBI to spy on a US citizen based on lies they'd payed a British agent to concoct. Let adults deal with these issues.


_________________
"No one believes more firmly than Comrade Napoleon that all animals are equal. He would be only too happy to let you make your decisions for yourselves. But sometimes you might make the wrong decisions, comrades, and then where should we be?"


VegetableMan
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 11 Jun 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,208
Location: Illinois

27 Jan 2020, 4:56 pm

cyberdad wrote:
VegetableMan wrote:
cyberdad wrote:
My point is the democrats are justified in being suspicious about her long term motives.


Why, because she was religiously indoctrinated as a child? She's apologized for the views she held when she was still basically a child.

The corporate Dems attack her because she has the balls to take on the political establishment and corruption in government. You're indoctrinated too. You support these a**holes, without the slightest clue what you're supporting. Hopefully, you can shake that off someday.


Are you also wearing John Powell's rose coloured glasses?

For the second time - my point is that the majority of the democrats don't trust her...it's got nothing to do with me...


Aren't you the one wearing the "rose colo(u)red glasses?" I mean, you still believe these miserable Democrats have a shred of human decency or give two s**ts about the people they're elected to serve. You couldn't get any more divorced from reality than that.

I've no doubt they don't trust Gabbard. They certainty can't trust her to do her part to maintain the oligarchy. They can't trust her to join the big club, the only membership requirement being take corporate money and roll over for your masters at every turn.

Yeah, she's untrustworthy alright. She's a menace to the billionaire class!


_________________
What do you call a hot dog in a gangster suit?

Oscar Meyer Lansky


cyberdad
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Feb 2011
Age: 58
Gender: Male
Posts: 36,036

28 Jan 2020, 12:25 am

VegetableMan wrote:
Yeah, she's untrustworthy alright. She's a menace to the billionaire class!


She is currently only a menace to the democrat party and a welcome ally to the republicans and their billionaire supporters one of whom is sitting in the white house.