Page 2 of 4 [ 51 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

EnglishLulu
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Apr 2006
Age: 56
Gender: Female
Posts: 735

20 Feb 2009, 5:41 pm

slowmutant wrote:
A woman's reproductive freedom takes precedent over everything else?
Erm, yes, my body. No woman should be *forced* to continue with a pregnancy against her will, providing the pregnancy hasn't reached a certain time limit, in the region of 20-24 weeks, before which life isn't really independently sustainable.

My personal/religious belief dictates around 12 weeks, but I don't think I should have the right to impose my own religious beliefs on another woman who may be an atheist, or may have alternative beliefs.



kalantir
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Dec 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 712
Location: Redmond, WA USA

20 Feb 2009, 5:55 pm

I don't feel the goverment has the right to impose laws on whether or not abortion is allowed. However, I am against abortion, and I do believe that doctors should not be allowed to perform them considering the oath they have to take to receive their license. As a side note, in addition to abortion resulting in a 100% chance of death for the unborn child(obviously, thats the point).. Its also quite dangerous for the woman getting the abortion, with the death rate being 3 times higher then simply giving birth. It's a lose lose situation.


_________________
2101729 Kalantir-Bar-Orc-Mal-Cha escaped the dungeon


history_of_psychiatry
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Dec 2006
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,105
Location: X

20 Feb 2009, 6:12 pm

Glad to see the puritans are at it again. Next thing you know they'll pass a law stating that anyone who works on the sabbath is to be stoned to death.


_________________
X


kalantir
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Dec 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 712
Location: Redmond, WA USA

20 Feb 2009, 6:36 pm

history_of_psychiatry wrote:
Glad to see the puritans are at it again. Next thing you know they'll pass a law stating that anyone who works on the sabbath is to be stoned to death.

Nah... you see... that used to be a law... untill Jesus came along anyways...


_________________
2101729 Kalantir-Bar-Orc-Mal-Cha escaped the dungeon


irikarah
Sea Gull
Sea Gull

User avatar

Joined: 24 Aug 2008
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 206
Location: Portland, OR

20 Feb 2009, 6:49 pm

slowmutant wrote:
Why is rape more unspeakable than infanticide?

A rape victim is not a potential life, but an actual, living, breathing, fully-formed, functioning person.

Furthermore, for infanticide to occur, the victim has to be an actual infant, the stage of life that begins with birth. If a child is unborn, let alone lacking or still growing vital organs, they're not an infant.



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 89
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

20 Feb 2009, 8:05 pm

kalantir wrote:
I don't feel the goverment has the right to impose laws on whether or not abortion is allowed. However, I am against abortion, and I do believe that doctors should not be allowed to perform them considering the oath they have to take to receive their license. As a side note, in addition to abortion resulting in a 100% chance of death for the unborn child(obviously, thats the point).. Its also quite dangerous for the woman getting the abortion, with the death rate being 3 times higher then simply giving birth. It's a lose lose situation.


Consider an ectopic pregnancy. If the embryo is not aborted the mother dies. Do you think a doctor should refuse to do what is necessary to save the woman? In the case of an ectopic pregnancy the mother will die way before the fetus is viable.

ruveyn



irikarah
Sea Gull
Sea Gull

User avatar

Joined: 24 Aug 2008
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 206
Location: Portland, OR

20 Feb 2009, 8:19 pm

kalantir wrote:
I do believe that doctors should not be allowed to perform them considering the oath they have to take to receive their license.

The Hippocratic Oath is not required, nor is not legally-binding for those who choose to swear it. There are also many variations from the original, many of which contain no references to prohibiting abortion.



slowmutant
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 Feb 2008
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,430
Location: Ontario, Canada

21 Feb 2009, 9:18 am

Quote:
I do believe that doctors should not be allowed to perform them considering the oath they have to take to receive their license.


You refer to the Hippocratic Oath, whereby the physician-to-be swears to first, do no harm.

But then think of plastic surgery, where doctors do plenty of unnecessary harm to their patients, at the patients' behest.



ShadesOfMe
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Jun 2004
Age: 35
Gender: Female
Posts: 16,983
Location: California

21 Feb 2009, 9:33 am

EnglishLulu wrote:
slowmutant wrote:
A woman's reproductive freedom takes precedent over everything else?
Erm, yes, my body. No woman should be *forced* to continue with a pregnancy against her will, providing the pregnancy hasn't reached a certain time limit, in the region of 20-24 weeks, before which life isn't really independently sustainable.

My personal/religious belief dictates around 12 weeks, but I don't think I should have the right to impose my own religious beliefs on another woman who may be an atheist, or may have alternative beliefs.
Exactly. It's like any other thing about a body. You shouldn't be forced to do or not do anything to it you don't want to.



slowmutant
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 Feb 2008
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,430
Location: Ontario, Canada

21 Feb 2009, 9:36 am

irikarah wrote:
kalantir wrote:
I do believe that doctors should not be allowed to perform them considering the oath they have to take to receive their license.

The Hippocratic Oath is not required, nor is not legally-binding for those who choose to swear it. There are also many variations from the original, many of which contain no references to prohibiting abortion.


If the Hippocratic Oath is not legally binding, why does it exist? Since when is it optional?



MissConstrue
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Feb 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 17,052
Location: MO

21 Feb 2009, 9:55 am

history_of_psychiatry wrote:
Glad to see the puritans are at it again. Next thing you know they'll pass a law stating that anyone who works on the sabbath is to be stoned to death.


Yep.

Mind you I'm pro life only on a certain stage of the fetus.

The "baby" is just a cell in the first weeks when conceived.


_________________
I live as I choose or I will not live at all.
~Delores O’Riordan


slowmutant
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 Feb 2008
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,430
Location: Ontario, Canada

21 Feb 2009, 10:11 am

MissConstrue wrote:
history_of_psychiatry wrote:
Glad to see the puritans are at it again. Next thing you know they'll pass a law stating that anyone who works on the sabbath is to be stoned to death.


Yep.

Mind you I'm pro life only on a certain stage of the fetus.

The "baby" is just a cell in the first weeks when conceived.


We were all "just cells" during those first few weeks. Why do pro-choicers have such contempt for life?



MissConstrue
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Feb 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 17,052
Location: MO

21 Feb 2009, 10:18 am

What are you talking about? :roll:

Yes we are cells...that's what we're descended from...sperm and egg.


_________________
I live as I choose or I will not live at all.
~Delores O’Riordan


ed
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Dec 2004
Age: 82
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,788
Location: Whitinsville, MA

21 Feb 2009, 10:20 am

This is such a stupid discussion. If we all worked together to make abortion unnecessary we could achieve so much more than we can by bickering.

NO ONE is pro-abortion... the only difference we have is that some people feel that it should be made a crime.


_________________
How can we outlaw a plant created by a perfect God?


slowmutant
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 Feb 2008
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,430
Location: Ontario, Canada

21 Feb 2009, 10:24 am

Quote:
If we all worked together to make abortion unnecessary we could achieve so much more than we can by bickering.


Agreed! :D



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 89
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

21 Feb 2009, 12:02 pm

slowmutant wrote:
Quote:
If we all worked together to make abortion unnecessary we could achieve so much more than we can by bickering.


Agreed! :D


Or even better if we stopped minding the business of women who decide what they will do with their own bodies, things might also be better.

ruveyn