Page 13 of 44 [ 691 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 ... 44  Next

EzraS
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Sep 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 27,828
Location: Twin Peaks

27 Dec 2019, 7:43 pm

When all else fails we post that same nasa link, because that shows how scientific we are.



beneficii
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 May 2005
Age: 42
Gender: Female
Posts: 7,245

27 Dec 2019, 7:44 pm

EzraS wrote:
When all else fails we post that same nasa link, because that shows how scientific we are.


Well, when they're posting pseudoscience 10 times and we're posting rebuttals only 9, then they'll just declare victory.


_________________
"You have a responsibility to consider all sides of a problem and a responsibility to make a judgment and a responsibility to care for all involved." --Ian Danskin


cyberdad
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Feb 2011
Age: 58
Gender: Male
Posts: 36,036

27 Dec 2019, 7:52 pm

EzraS wrote:
When all else fails we post that same nasa link, because that shows how scientific we are.


That's still 1 zip :lol:



cyberdad
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Feb 2011
Age: 58
Gender: Male
Posts: 36,036

27 Dec 2019, 7:55 pm

beneficii wrote:
EzraS wrote:
When all else fails we post that same nasa link, because that shows how scientific we are.


Well, when they're posting pseudoscience 10 times and we're posting rebuttals only 9, then they'll just declare victory.


Using the old Ezra deflection technique...don't read facts and ignore content if it exposes the lies you believe or puts the trolling you enjoy to an end.



EzraS
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Sep 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 27,828
Location: Twin Peaks

27 Dec 2019, 8:20 pm

There seems to be a problem with sticking with "who must not be named" and dropping names.



EzraS
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Sep 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 27,828
Location: Twin Peaks

27 Dec 2019, 8:23 pm

beneficii wrote:
EzraS wrote:
When all else fails we post that same nasa link, because that shows how scientific we are.


Well, when they're posting pseudoscience 10 times and we're posting rebuttals only 9, then they'll just declare victory.


Right real science is found in outdated guardian articles and climate catastrophe activist blogs. Oh and that ace in the hole nasa page, that likely isn't understood by those post it.



cyberdad
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Feb 2011
Age: 58
Gender: Male
Posts: 36,036

27 Dec 2019, 8:31 pm

EzraS wrote:
There seems to be a problem with sticking with "who must not be named" and dropping names.


He who "Shalt not be named" must first seek redemption for his sins.



cyberdad
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Feb 2011
Age: 58
Gender: Male
Posts: 36,036

27 Dec 2019, 8:33 pm

EzraS wrote:
beneficii wrote:
EzraS wrote:
When all else fails we post that same nasa link, because that shows how scientific we are.


Well, when they're posting pseudoscience 10 times and we're posting rebuttals only 9, then they'll just declare victory.


Right real science is found in outdated guardian articles and climate catastrophe activist blogs. Oh and that ace in the hole nasa page, that likely isn't understood by those post it.


I could provide links from the IPCC and every major university and institute in the world...would that sway your stubbornness?....probably not....power of the dark side :lol:



Pepe
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 11 Jun 2013
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 26,635
Location: Australia

27 Dec 2019, 9:16 pm

cyberdad wrote:
An unamed poster made it appear that a flatline graph isn't impressive by sneakily stretching the celcius scale on the y-axis. Obviously assumes we are ignorant and that manipulating line graphs will make an impression.


I was going to make this point about stats manipulation myself.
"Lies,
Damn lies,
And statistics",
Sort of thing.

Who would have thought we were on the same page, for once. 8O :scratch:

I hope you are getting smarter.
The alternative would be too horrendous to contemplate! 8O :mrgreen:

Pepe: A black-belt in the "Back-Handed Compliment". :ninja:



EzraS
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Sep 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 27,828
Location: Twin Peaks

27 Dec 2019, 9:25 pm

cyberdad wrote:
EzraS wrote:
beneficii wrote:
EzraS wrote:
When all else fails we post that same nasa link, because that shows how scientific we are.


Well, when they're posting pseudoscience 10 times and we're posting rebuttals only 9, then they'll just declare victory.


Right real science is found in outdated guardian articles and climate catastrophe activist blogs. Oh and that ace in the hole nasa page, that likely isn't understood by those post it.


I could provide links from the IPCC and every major university and institute in the world...would that sway your stubbornness?....probably not....power of the dark side :lol:


I already know of your predilection for winging it by grabbing stuff off the internet that you obviously don't read.



Pepe
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 11 Jun 2013
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 26,635
Location: Australia

27 Dec 2019, 9:26 pm

SoloSailor wrote:
And remember: Scale matters.

Image


Yep.

Oh my,
Torn between to luvers,
Feeling like a fool,
Luving you both is breaking all the rulz. :mrgreen:


https://youtu.be/SkKSd3tSNHw



Pepe
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 11 Jun 2013
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 26,635
Location: Australia

27 Dec 2019, 9:34 pm

EzraS wrote:

I already know of your predilection for winging it by grabbing stuff off the internet that you obviously don't read.


It happens. :shrug:

Oh,
You weren't talking to me. 8O



cyberdad
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Feb 2011
Age: 58
Gender: Male
Posts: 36,036

27 Dec 2019, 10:38 pm

EzraS wrote:
cyberdad wrote:
EzraS wrote:
beneficii wrote:
EzraS wrote:
When all else fails we post that same nasa link, because that shows how scientific we are.


Well, when they're posting pseudoscience 10 times and we're posting rebuttals only 9, then they'll just declare victory.


Right real science is found in outdated guardian articles and climate catastrophe activist blogs. Oh and that ace in the hole nasa page, that likely isn't understood by those post it.


I could provide links from the IPCC and every major university and institute in the world...would that sway your stubbornness?....probably not....power of the dark side :lol:


I already know of your predilection for winging it by grabbing stuff off the internet that you obviously don't read.


When debating a specific position it helps to have evidence...you should try it some time :lol:



EzraS
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Sep 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 27,828
Location: Twin Peaks

27 Dec 2019, 10:45 pm

cyberdad wrote:
EzraS wrote:
cyberdad wrote:
EzraS wrote:
beneficii wrote:
EzraS wrote:
When all else fails we post that same nasa link, because that shows how scientific we are.


Well, when they're posting pseudoscience 10 times and we're posting rebuttals only 9, then they'll just declare victory.


Right real science is found in outdated guardian articles and climate catastrophe activist blogs. Oh and that ace in the hole nasa page, that likely isn't understood by those post it.


I could provide links from the IPCC and every major university and institute in the world...would that sway your stubbornness?....probably not....power of the dark side :lol:


I already know of your predilection for winging it by grabbing stuff off the internet that you obviously don't read.


When debating a specific position it helps to have evidence...you should try it some time :lol:


Grabbing stuff off the internet you haven't read is not presenting evidence, it's pretending to. And I have no intention of trying to do the same.



cyberdad
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Feb 2011
Age: 58
Gender: Male
Posts: 36,036

27 Dec 2019, 11:01 pm

If the "stuff" is based on peer reviewed research then it's usually worth reading which is why I invite you to join the world critical thought



EzraS
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Sep 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 27,828
Location: Twin Peaks

28 Dec 2019, 1:59 am

cyberdad wrote:
If the "stuff" is based on peer reviewed research then it's usually worth reading which is why I invite you to join the world critical thought


How would you know when you don't read any of it.