"Britain Is More Germanic Than It Thinks"
Kraichgauer
Veteran
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
The Saxons are from northern Germany and came with the Romans.
The vast majority of settlers who were to become the English people migrated from the nearby coastal lands of Flanders and have more in common ethnically with the Dutch, Flemish and Normans than with the Anglo-Saxons.
The proper name should Franko-Friesian.
While there were I believe, some Saxons who had been serving with the Romans in Britain, the majority in fact came with the invading Angles, Jutes, and Frisians. There is even written evidence of Britain being colonized by what ancient writers called Broukteri, who are believed to be the Frankish tribe of the Bructeri. Artifacts discovered in Britain from the German Rhineland backs up the notion of the Franks/Bructeri having settled alongside the Anglo-Saxons.
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
Historically the ruling class in England have always been of Danish Viking (Angles and Jutes) or Norman (Frankish Vikings). The common peasant stock were mainly Frisian. If you look at cattle in the UK the Frisian variety is most common as they were bought from their ancestral homeland along the Flanders coast, The rest were made up of the ancestors of the Germanic Franks. The Anglo-Saxon stock were always a thin crust of the ruling class.
While doubtlessly the size of the Frisian, and even Frankish, population in Britain has always been underestimated, I tend to agree with the theory that the various tribal groups tended to intermix rather than stay apart on tribal lines. We know that there had been migration from the Saxon homeland in coastal north Germany, as the region had largely been depopulated in the 5th and 6th centuries, as the flat, marshy land became increasingly a rare commodity. Though it is true that the Saxons remaining on the continent ended up expanding inland at the expense of their Thuringian and Frankish neighbors, I would not discount a significant migration to Britain earlier.
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
I've known this for years. I studied old English for a little while and it's roots are very much Germanic, especially Dutch. I've not got a problem with saying I am from a Germanic country, I don't know why anyone would.
_________________
I have HFA, ADHD, OCD & Tourette syndrome. I love animals, especially my bunnies and hamster. I skate in a roller derby team (but I'll try not to bite
The Saxons are from northern Germany and came with the Romans.
The vast majority of settlers who were to become the English people migrated from the nearby coastal lands of Flanders and have more in common ethnically with the Dutch, Flemish and Normans than with the Anglo-Saxons.
The proper name should Franko-Friesian.
It's indeed said that Friesian is the language with most words similar to English.Whereas Dutch origins are prominent,the term "Dutch" originally meant "German" (as in modern Deutsche) so those who came from what is now Netherlands are included in the wide-ranging term Germanic,as are the Angles and Normans.
_________________
I have lost the will to be apathetic
No, the point is that the Irish are a Celtic rather than a Germanic nation, yet they all speak English there and "Gaelic" (always referred to as just "Irish" in Ireland) is spoken by a small minority of the population mainly in rural areas.
Yeah, I got that. It's still nitpicking over wording to say that in reply to what was posted. Or was it willfully ignoring the point to make your own point even though it's irrelevant? Or, maybe neither... maybe it was simple missing the point. But anyway about it, your reply is in effect saying "no that's not true", when the point being made is true, even if the wording oversimplifies the story.
_________________
not aspie, not NT, somewhere in between
Aspie Quiz: 110 Aspie, 103 Neurotypical.
Used to be more autistic than I am now.
The Saxons are from northern Germany and came with the Romans.
The vast majority of settlers who were to become the English people migrated from the nearby coastal lands of Flanders and have more in common ethnically with the Dutch, Flemish and Normans than with the Anglo-Saxons.
The proper name should Franko-Friesian.
While there were I believe, some Saxons who had been serving with the Romans in Britain, the majority in fact came with the invading Angles, Jutes, and Frisians. There is even written evidence of Britain being colonized by what ancient writers called Broukteri, who are believed to be the Frankish tribe of the Bructeri. Artifacts discovered in Britain from the German Rhineland backs up the notion of the Franks/Bructeri having settled alongside the Anglo-Saxons.
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
Historically the ruling class in England have always been of Danish Viking (Angles and Jutes) or Norman (Frankish Vikings). The common peasant stock were mainly Frisian. If you look at cattle in the UK the Frisian variety is most common as they were bought from their ancestral homeland along the Flanders coast, The rest were made up of the ancestors of the Germanic Franks. The Anglo-Saxon stock were always a thin crust of the ruling class.
While doubtlessly the size of the Frisian, and even Frankish, population in Britain has always been underestimated, I tend to agree with the theory that the various tribal groups tended to intermix rather than stay apart on tribal lines. We know that there had been migration from the Saxon homeland in coastal north Germany, as the region had largely been depopulated in the 5th and 6th centuries, as the flat, marshy land became increasingly a rare commodity. Though it is true that the Saxons remaining on the continent ended up expanding inland at the expense of their Thuringian and Frankish neighbors, I would not discount a significant migration to Britain earlier.
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
Yes the great battle of Hastings in 1066 was between Harold the last great Angle (English) king and William Duke of Normandy who was French speaking Viking stock (many of the descendants in Normandy in France still retain a vague cultural affinity with Scandanavia).
The two greatest heroes of English culture are Beauwolf and Alfred represent both the Angle and Saxon rulers. I am convinced Beauwolf was a Danish speaking chieftan who ruled somewhere in the south east coast of England. His return to Jutland to fight for Hrothgar (King of the Danes) was heralded and his exploits became the stuff of legend you read in this famous folktale. Beauwulf is typical of the Angle stock who arrived in Britain around 600-900AD.
The second great English hero was Alfred (the Great). He is descended from the early Northern German tribes who migrated initially as mercanaries under the service of the Romans to fight the Scots. Alfred (or Aelfred) defined himself as king of the West Saxons. His father's name was Aethulwulf of Wessex. Alfred protected the fledgling English nation from the Norseman hordes who periodically besieged the coastline. Alfred was the first true Anglo-Saxon King.
The biggest immigrant population in Britain is the english,the Irish (haplotype R1b) are the original inhabitants of the islands.As for `terrorists`-all natives who resist foreign invaders are termed `terrorrists`.We have been in the isles for 50,000 years plus-the germans have been here since last week in historical terms.
You are being outbred by newer immigrants anyway and will be a minority in `England` by mid century-what comes around goes around eh?
en the first official language of Ireland, ahead of English. But only a small minority of the Irish speak Irish. Most people speak English and don't know any Irish. So, they have road signs and government services in Irish but most Irish people don't need and have no use for them, and particularly in Northern Ireland Irish is associated with terrorists amongst Unionists.
What you've got to remember though, is that for most Irish people what happened in the 1800s is history. Only republicans, terrorists and their supporters really go on about "centuries of British oppression" these days.
Most of the Irish feel no animosity towards Britain and the British - how could they, when the Irish are the biggest minority population in England? Most English people feel much more at home in the Republic of Ireland than in Northern Ireland, because sectarianism and anti-British feeling has largely died down there apart from an extreme minority.[/quote]
_________________
Asperger's is not a disease
http://www.neurodiversity.com/main.html
http://neurelitism.com/
http://www.neurodiversityinternational.org.uk/
