State of emergency: High tension in Virginia as right-wing

Page 3 of 12 [ 182 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 12  Next

funeralxempire
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 41
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 34,228
Location: Right over your left shoulder

18 Jan 2020, 1:31 pm

ASPartOfMe wrote:
goldfish21 wrote:
http://huffp.st/1YBVcQL
is all the fault of left wing reporting. :lol:

One problem with calling or implying everything is Nazi/Fascist/Alt-Right is when an actual hate and terrorist groups are revealed the reporting is dismissed as deliberately planned hysteria.


Sadly, what you're describing is mostly a tactic used by the far-right to undermine legitimate reports of terrorism that are connected to the right. Any time a terrorist with right-wing ideological motivations draws attention to themselves the far-right will try to insist that person was motivated by anything but far-right ideology.


_________________
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing. —Malcolm X
Just a reminder: under international law, an occupying power has no right of self-defense, and those who are occupied have the right and duty to liberate themselves by any means possible.


cyberdad
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Feb 2011
Age: 58
Gender: Male
Posts: 36,036

18 Jan 2020, 7:58 pm

ASPartOfMe wrote:
Three more suspected neo-Nazis arrested before Virginia gun rights rally, authorities say
President Trump on Friday warned of an “attack” on the Second Amendment after Virginia Democrats curtailed access for firearms at the state capitol.

“Your 2nd Amendment is under very serious attack in the Great Commonwealth of Virginia. That’s what happens when you vote for Democrats, they will take your guns away. Republicans will win Virginia in 2020. Thank you Dems!” Trump tweet
[/quote]

Trump seems to have myopia when it comes neo-Nazis....a gathering of a nazi rally and Trump appears to throw support behind their rally by invoking the 2nd amendment. His Klan father would be proud.



cyberdad
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Feb 2011
Age: 58
Gender: Male
Posts: 36,036

18 Jan 2020, 8:04 pm

funeralxempire wrote:
Any time a terrorist with right-wing ideological motivations draws attention to themselves the far-right will try to insist that person was motivated by anything but far-right ideology.


Strategy seems to be working. Republicans are lauding the rally as fighting for 2nd amendment rights. Very quiet aren't they about the arrests?

The ultra-right used the Charlottesville protest to garner support from their fellow republicans claiming the removal of statues celebrating famous pro-slave warriors was an attack on American civil liberties. That's exactly why Trump said there were fine people on both sides.



ASPartOfMe
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Aug 2013
Age: 68
Gender: Male
Posts: 39,637
Location: Long Island, New York

18 Jan 2020, 10:02 pm

Court OK's temporary weapons ban at Virginia Capitol amid fear of violence at gun rally

Quote:
The Supreme Court of Virginia on Friday upheld a temporary ban on firearms at the state Capitol ahead of a pro-gun rally on Monday that authorities believed could lead to extremist violence.


_________________
“Self Acceptance is a process not a performance”
“You are autistic enough. And you always have been”

Professionally Identified and joined WP August 26, 2013
DSM 5: Autism Spectrum Disorder, DSM IV: Aspergers Moderate Severity.


Persephone29
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Jun 2019
Age: 58
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,406
Location: Everville

19 Jan 2020, 5:46 am

It's never the gun advocates you see that will do the fighting. Have fun focusing on the whack-a-moles who are dumb enough to stick their heads up.


_________________
Disagreeing with you doesn't mean I hate you, it just means we disagree.

Neurocognitive exam in May 2019, diagnosed with ASD, Asperger's type in June 2019.


Bravo5150
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 12 Aug 2019
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,669

19 Jan 2020, 5:53 am

ASPartOfMe wrote:
Court OK's temporary weapons ban at Virginia Capitol amid fear of violence at gun rally
Quote:
The Supreme Court of Virginia on Friday upheld a temporary ban on firearms at the state Capitol ahead of a pro-gun rally on Monday that authorities believed could lead to extremist violence.



How did they get a first amendment argument out of having a ban on carrying a weapon?



Tim_Tex
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Jul 2004
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 46,689
Location: Houston, Texas

19 Jan 2020, 12:24 pm

Borromeo wrote:
This sort of talk produces very little benefit on a public forum and should be reserved for an echo chamber among like-minded people; better yet, if you haven't any good to say about someone, don't say it. If you are emasculating anyone, guns are not the part you are trying to remove and I believe we can move this into the transgender discussion category; furthermore, when you say something like that, the effects are twofold. First, by assuming people into a class and then stereotyping, you show your ignorance. Secondly, by attacking them, you show your arrogance.

You have invalidated your opinion on gun control by that statement, I believe, because talk like that shows an unwillingness to let a conclusion spoil an argument. Saying things like that is what will make the other side angry and feel threatened, and determination and cunning are going to beat someone whose raison d'être is more worthy of a middle-school playground babbler.

Unfortunately, such a weak argument is almost impossible to disagree with, but it paints you as a very disagreeable person, the kind of entitled and arrogant vacuity against which the working class man might well wish to protect himself. It's not about your philosophy at this point; how will you ever persuade anybody to agree with you when prejudice keeps you disagreeable?


The "emasculation" remark was in reference to the saying that people buy guns to compensate for having small genitals.


_________________
Who’s better at math than a robot? They’re made of math!


Wolfram87
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Feb 2015
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,976
Location: Sweden

19 Jan 2020, 12:49 pm

That doesn't make you any less spiteful, any less ignorant, any less myopic or any less authoritarian, and the fact that you think that it does is somewhat frightening.


_________________
I'm bored out of my skull, let's play a different game. Let's pay a visit down below and cast the world in flame.


ASPartOfMe
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Aug 2013
Age: 68
Gender: Male
Posts: 39,637
Location: Long Island, New York

19 Jan 2020, 2:18 pm

Tim_Tex wrote:
Borromeo wrote:
This sort of talk produces very little benefit on a public forum and should be reserved for an echo chamber among like-minded people; better yet, if you haven't any good to say about someone, don't say it. If you are emasculating anyone, guns are not the part you are trying to remove and I believe we can move this into the transgender discussion category; furthermore, when you say something like that, the effects are twofold. First, by assuming people into a class and then stereotyping, you show your ignorance. Secondly, by attacking them, you show your arrogance.

You have invalidated your opinion on gun control by that statement, I believe, because talk like that shows an unwillingness to let a conclusion spoil an argument. Saying things like that is what will make the other side angry and feel threatened, and determination and cunning are going to beat someone whose raison d'être is more worthy of a middle-school playground babbler.

Unfortunately, such a weak argument is almost impossible to disagree with, but it paints you as a very disagreeable person, the kind of entitled and arrogant vacuity against which the working class man might well wish to protect himself. It's not about your philosophy at this point; how will you ever persuade anybody to agree with you when prejudice keeps you disagreeable?


The "emasculation" remark was in reference to the saying that people buy guns to compensate for having small genitals.

I have not heard that one in awhile. Gun ownership as a compensory phallic symbol was a common stereotype back in the ‘70s.


_________________
“Self Acceptance is a process not a performance”
“You are autistic enough. And you always have been”

Professionally Identified and joined WP August 26, 2013
DSM 5: Autism Spectrum Disorder, DSM IV: Aspergers Moderate Severity.


Borromeo
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 1 Jun 2019
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,440

19 Jan 2020, 3:37 pm

Tim_Tex wrote:
Borromeo wrote:
This sort of talk produces very little benefit on a public forum and should be reserved for an echo chamber among like-minded people; better yet, if you haven't any good to say about someone, don't say it. If you are emasculating anyone, guns are not the part you are trying to remove and I believe we can move this into the transgender discussion category; furthermore, when you say something like that, the effects are twofold. First, by assuming people into a class and then stereotyping, you show your ignorance. Secondly, by attacking them, you show your arrogance.

You have invalidated your opinion on gun control by that statement, I believe, because talk like that shows an unwillingness to let a conclusion spoil an argument. Saying things like that is what will make the other side angry and feel threatened, and determination and cunning are going to beat someone whose raison d'être is more worthy of a middle-school playground babbler.

Unfortunately, such a weak argument is almost impossible to disagree with, but it paints you as a very disagreeable person, the kind of entitled and arrogant vacuity against which the working class man might well wish to protect himself. It's not about your philosophy at this point; how will you ever persuade anybody to agree with you when prejudice keeps you disagreeable?


The "emasculation" remark was in reference to the saying that people buy guns to compensate for having small genitals.


I'm autistic, not ret*d. I can read what you wrote, but I don't have to agree with it, and if anything it makes you as petty as Trump himself, arguing with that North Korean commie about whose button was bigger.


_________________
Your neurodiverse (Aspie) score: 134 of 200
Your neurotypical (non-autistic) score: 72 of 200
You are very likely neurodiverse (Aspie)


cyberdad
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Feb 2011
Age: 58
Gender: Male
Posts: 36,036

19 Jan 2020, 4:26 pm

Borromeo wrote:
Tim_Tex wrote:
Borromeo wrote:
This sort of talk produces very little benefit on a public forum and should be reserved for an echo chamber among like-minded people; better yet, if you haven't any good to say about someone, don't say it. If you are emasculating anyone, guns are not the part you are trying to remove and I believe we can move this into the transgender discussion category; furthermore, when you say something like that, the effects are twofold. First, by assuming people into a class and then stereotyping, you show your ignorance. Secondly, by attacking them, you show your arrogance.

You have invalidated your opinion on gun control by that statement, I believe, because talk like that shows an unwillingness to let a conclusion spoil an argument. Saying things like that is what will make the other side angry and feel threatened, and determination and cunning are going to beat someone whose raison d'être is more worthy of a middle-school playground babbler.

Unfortunately, such a weak argument is almost impossible to disagree with, but it paints you as a very disagreeable person, the kind of entitled and arrogant vacuity against which the working class man might well wish to protect himself. It's not about your philosophy at this point; how will you ever persuade anybody to agree with you when prejudice keeps you disagreeable?


The "emasculation" remark was in reference to the saying that people buy guns to compensate for having small genitals.


I'm autistic, not ret*d. I can read what you wrote, but I don't have to agree with it, and if anything it makes you as petty as Trump himself, arguing with that North Korean commie about whose button was bigger.


Avoid using the r-word please



cyberdad
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Feb 2011
Age: 58
Gender: Male
Posts: 36,036

19 Jan 2020, 4:27 pm

ASPartOfMe wrote:
I have not heard that one in awhile. Gun ownership as a compensory phallic symbol was a common stereotype back in the ‘70s.


Actually makes sense, owning a powerful gun is like owning a large gas guzzling car...compensating



JohnPowell
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Feb 2016
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,806
Location: Palestine

19 Jan 2020, 4:32 pm

EzraS wrote:
kraftiekortie wrote:
Or alleged "race war," as "prophesied" in various works by white racists.

I feel the governor did the right thing.


I have a feeling it's far more the white left making such prophecies.


As always. It's their only card. If some liberal traitors start trying to f**k with the Consitution they will get in trouble.


_________________
"No one believes more firmly than Comrade Napoleon that all animals are equal. He would be only too happy to let you make your decisions for yourselves. But sometimes you might make the wrong decisions, comrades, and then where should we be?"


JohnPowell
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Feb 2016
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,806
Location: Palestine

19 Jan 2020, 4:35 pm

cyberdad wrote:
funeralxempire wrote:
Any time a terrorist with right-wing ideological motivations draws attention to themselves the far-right will try to insist that person was motivated by anything but far-right ideology.


Strategy seems to be working. Republicans are lauding the rally as fighting for 2nd amendment rights. Very quiet aren't they about the arrests?

The ultra-right used the Charlottesville protest to garner support from their fellow republicans claiming the removal of statues celebrating famous pro-slave warriors was an attack on American civil liberties. That's exactly why Trump said there were fine people on both sides.


General Lee was a hero against the North's war of aggression. Only fantasist liberals just see race everywhere cause they are the real racists.


_________________
"No one believes more firmly than Comrade Napoleon that all animals are equal. He would be only too happy to let you make your decisions for yourselves. But sometimes you might make the wrong decisions, comrades, and then where should we be?"


cyberdad
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Feb 2011
Age: 58
Gender: Male
Posts: 36,036

19 Jan 2020, 4:49 pm

JohnPowell wrote:
General Lee was a hero against the North's war of aggression. Only fantasist liberals just see race everywhere cause they are the real racists.


Historical fact 1 - The primary catalyst for secession was slavery, most immediately the political battle over the right of Southerners to bring slavery into western territory that had hitherto been free under the terms of the Missouri Compromise or while part of Mexico. Another factor for secession and the formation of the Confederacy, was white Southern nationalism which was seperate to the union "American nationalism". Almost all historians agree on this

Historical Fact 2 -The war began when the Confederates bombarded Union soldiers at Fort Sumter, South Carolina on April 12, 1861.

Every recognised historian in the US agrees race was the primary factor in the south wanting secession and that the confederates were the instigators who started the war. General Lee was therefore both a white nationalist and a traitor



goldfish21
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Feb 2013
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 22,612
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada

19 Jan 2020, 5:26 pm

Don’t know anything about the dead guy to have an opinion, but this is the General Lee I grew up knowing & it remains totally acceptable today:

Image


_________________
No :heart: for supporting trump. Because doing so is deplorable.