Women accusing Trump of Sexual Harassment are liars
The Trump "joke" was not about women throwing themselves at him, it was about him grabbing women without their consent--as B19 pointed out, silence does not equal consent. Saying women only want money when they claim they've been sexually harassed or assaulted is disgusting but not unexpected in this place, I very much expected some guy to put that idea forward here. There is no point in me tearing about your assertion as you won't listen, you've obviously already made up your mind about women and nothing I say will make any difference. Maybe if some guys here had the guts to point out the flaws in your reasoning you might listen to them, as anything is more believable to someone like you if it's being argued by a person with a penis.
He made a stupid joke in which he said they let you do anything that is clearly consent. I did not say that women who claim to have been assaulted or harassed were only after money, I said the ones who are actually willing to have sex with him are only after money.
This thread isn't about women who willingly had sex with Trump, it's about women who accused him of harassment and assault.
People were claiming Trumps "grab them by the p****" comment was an admission of assault, it wasn't it was a joke. The joke being that some women will do anything to get with a rich and famous man.
If you grab a woman without getting her consent first, as he "jokingly" claimed to do, and she says nothing (usually for fear of reprisal, not because she's "letting" him) that is assault. The fact that so many guys choose to misinterpret it as consensual is telling about the messed up ideas many guys have about consent. If you doubt me, go grab a female police officer by the p**** as a joke and see how funny she finds it.
Why do you need so badly to believe this was a joke, when multiple women have claimed that Trump has done to them exactly what he claimed to do? Do you not understand this gives the impression you are a rape-apologist, or do you just not care? What does that say about you? You might want to do some introspection on this issue.
He clearly said they let you do it, why would he sit in a van and admit to sexual assault? He was being an a***hole making a stupid joke, he didn't say he actually did it. People are just pretending to believe this is him admitting to sexual assault because they don't like him its intellectual dishonestly.
If a woman doesn't fight you off or object when you've grabbed her, you've still sexually assaulted her. Silence is not consent. Why can't you understand that? Many women freeze when being assaulted, it is an instinctual reaction to being attacked. That does not make it OK to grab them. Why are you arguing for sexual assault, what is wrong with you?
It really does seem like you are being obtuse on this subject intentionally and are arguing with intellectual dishonesty. You really should ask yourself why that is. As for me, I'm done as you are obviously deeply psychologically invested in your obtuseness on this particular topic and it is pretty nauseating. 
Grabbing a woman's vagina without consent is clearly assault no one is claiming otherwise. People are claiming Trumps joke about grabbing a woman's vagina is an admission of guilt which it clearly is not. Trump was talking about how some women will do anything to get with rich and famous men, he said they let you do anything "grab them by the p****" part of humour is exaggerating. Making a distasteful joke is not admitting to assaulting someone.
No one on here is arguing whether or not Trump admitted to it or not. From his standpoint, he probably really believed that everything he has done was consensual, because not all the women "protested" when he grabbed them, and he was "bragging" about how great he is with women. I'm sorry, but I agree with the others who posted here - silence does not mean consent, and if you are unexpectedly grabbed somewhere in a public place you might not react/actively protest either due to surprise. Silence does not mean consent. There are waaayyyy too many women coming forward for me not to give credence to what is being said about him. Are you claiming that all, every single one of them, is lying? Every one of them wanted him to grab them? What, they're all prostitutes and hussies? You'd have to have a very poor opinion of women to swallow that one.
No one on here is arguing whether or not Trump admitted to it or not. From his standpoint, he probably really believed that everything he has done was consensual, because not all the women "protested" when he grabbed them, and he was "bragging" about how great he is with women. I'm sorry, but I agree with the others who posted here - silence does not mean consent, and if you are unexpectedly grabbed somewhere in a public place you might not react/actively protest either due to surprise. Silence does not mean consent. There are waaayyyy too many women coming forward for me not to give credence to what is being said about him. Are you claiming that all, every single one of them, is lying? Every one of them wanted him to grab them? What, they're all prostitutes and hussies? You'd have to have a very poor opinion of women to swallow that one.
I have not even mentioned the women who are accusing him, I have no idea whether he did assault them or not. Again I am not saying silence is consent, the "grab her by the p****" comment was him making a joke exaggerating what certain women are willing to let rich and famous men do to them in order to get money.
No one on here is arguing whether or not Trump admitted to it or not. From his standpoint, he probably really believed that everything he has done was consensual, because not all the women "protested" when he grabbed them, and he was "bragging" about how great he is with women. I'm sorry, but I agree with the others who posted here - silence does not mean consent, and if you are unexpectedly grabbed somewhere in a public place you might not react/actively protest either due to surprise. Silence does not mean consent. There are waaayyyy too many women coming forward for me not to give credence to what is being said about him. Are you claiming that all, every single one of them, is lying? Every one of them wanted him to grab them? What, they're all prostitutes and hussies? You'd have to have a very poor opinion of women to swallow that one.
I have not even mentioned the women who are accusing him, I have no idea whether he did assault them or not. Again I am not saying silence is consent, the "grab her by the p****" comment was him making a joke exaggerating what certain women are willing to let rich and famous men do to them in order to get money.
Very well. But you are the only person talking about that comment on here. The others who you keep contradicting are not. They are talking about the women who say they have been assaulted, and are basing their opinions on Trump off of that. Your continuation in repeating this one comment repeatedly as evidence of his "innocence" is debasing to women. It in no way exonerates Trump or makes him not guilty of assaulting women.
Daniel89 I think you might be, for whatever reason, in some very profound denial here. I see from other threads that you get why Roman Polanski is a criminal, so your denialism re Trump is puzzling to me. However, be that as it may, I think you can inadvertently illustrate something useful about denialism and how it is expressed by apologists.
In the dynamic of sexual objectification, and denialism, the other person is nothing other than a toy to be used. The target is depersonalised.. Nothing matters to the abuser other than how the victim’s body can be used to serve his narcissistic desires. Trump's history of intrusive voyeurism at the Miss Universe stuff is another perfect example.
Trump has a long, ugly history of objectifying and dehumanising women. He and Stern spent many hours judging women’s sexual appeal – and in fact, Stern told Trump that he was the world’s greatest judge of women’s beauty , because that was most of what they did together on the radio show.
One of his rape victims may have been a thirteen-year-old girl. There was an investigative report into Trump’s modeling agency that suggests that he has a thing about underage girls. Trump brags about this:
In one Twitter post, he wrote: “’You date girls young enough to be your daughter. That’s perverted.’ No, that’s talent.”
When his daughter Tiffany was a toddler, he commented on her breasts. He has repeatedly commented on his daughter Ivanka’s body, saying that he created her body, and that if she weren’t his daughter, he would date her. He has made creepy comments about wanting to kiss her all the time. (He actually reached for her behind at the Republican National Convention.) He also talked about her with Stern, who said she was a “piece of ass.”
If denialism is the first automatic response of the abuser's cadre, gaslighting is usually the close second.
Gaslighting is a tactic in which an abuser tries to deny the victim’s entire experience of events, making the survivor out as a liar, or acting in bad faith. As an abuser's tactic, it's a classic, and one Trump has often resorted to, as abusers do.
Trump’s so-called “apology” for the tape includes attempts at gaslighting – for example, when he says, “This is nothing more than a distraction from the important issues we’re facing today.” As if to say, “Why are you all making such a big deal out of this? It’s nothing.”
Notice the “but” – a tactic for making an apology not an apology.
ullied, attacked, shamed and intimidated his victims. We will discuss this more in the coming days.”
The third defence these creeps tend to use is the "others do too" response (hey, look over there!").
Many of his supporters do the same as if that justifies Trump's offending.
Trump uses another tactic well known to abusers: when confronted with his own misdeeds, he twists it around to make himself out to be the victim. Trump is an inveterate blame-shifter, and so are many of his apologists.
There are countless examples of this, not just in the realm of sexual assaults. When he was asked about the many small businesses that he stiffed while he built his business empire, he blamed the business owners. “Maybe they just didn’t do a good job,” he said. In other words, if he doesn’t pay his bill, it’s the supplier’s fault.
Trying to debate with abuse denialists also runs a predictable course: you soon feel like the person you’re talking to hasn’t heard a word you say. They may continue banging away at the exact same line over and over, as if you haven’t even said anything.
Nevertheless, the hope remains that some light will seep through the cracks.
No one on here is arguing whether or not Trump admitted to it or not. From his standpoint, he probably really believed that everything he has done was consensual, because not all the women "protested" when he grabbed them, and he was "bragging" about how great he is with women. I'm sorry, but I agree with the others who posted here - silence does not mean consent, and if you are unexpectedly grabbed somewhere in a public place you might not react/actively protest either due to surprise. Silence does not mean consent. There are waaayyyy too many women coming forward for me not to give credence to what is being said about him. Are you claiming that all, every single one of them, is lying? Every one of them wanted him to grab them? What, they're all prostitutes and hussies? You'd have to have a very poor opinion of women to swallow that one.
I have not even mentioned the women who are accusing him, I have no idea whether he did assault them or not. Again I am not saying silence is consent, the "grab her by the p****" comment was him making a joke exaggerating what certain women are willing to let rich and famous men do to them in order to get money.
Very well. But you are the only person talking about that comment on here. The others who you keep contradicting are not. They are talking about the women who say they have been assaulted, and are basing their opinions on Trump off of that. Your continuation in repeating this one comment repeatedly as evidence of his "innocence" is debasing to women. It in no way exonerates Trump or makes him not guilty of assaulting women.
No they specifically claimed the grab him by the p**** comment was him admitting to sexual assault.
Kraichgauer
Veteran
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
If powerful men like Cosby and Weinstein can be guilty of sexual assault, why not Trump, who bragged about being a serial p*ssy grabber?
No he didn't he made a Joke about what rich guys can get away with and how women behave around them.
Exactly. He was making it clear consent was involved. But in order to villify, you have to disregard that part.
Apparently in liberalism a woman allowing a man to touch her vagina is like a Victorian age no no.
I'm sorry, but you have to perform mental gymnastics to get around the fact that Trump was talking about himself. And if anything, rather than being an explanation of getting consent to touch a woman's vagina, this is really about Trump's contempt for women, and use of his status as a rich celebrity to violate them regardless if they wanted it or not.
By very definition if they wanted it then its not a violation. These women are prostitutes they will let ugly old fat guys like Donald have sex with them for a chance at getting rich they are not representative of women in general.
There are plenty of women who say Trump's sexual advances were not welcome at all, but that didn't stop him.
And prostitutes? Bit of a low opinion of the women in question.
Women who are willing to have sex with Trump are attracted to what exactly? His dashing good looks? Charming personality? Witty intellect? No the only think he has going for him is money, these young attractive women only care about that I think most people would agree there is no difference between that and normal prostitution.
But he wasn't talking about women who'd have sex with him just for money, he was talking about women he'd randomly grab up-the-skirt. Consent on their part was nothing that Trump probably ever concerned himself about. It's a matter of respecting another person, rather than dehumanizing him or her. What if Trump was gay, and was randomly grabbing men's penises? Does that mean those men would be prostitutes for reacting with stunned silence? And just because a man or women feels pressured into a sexual situation by a powerful person doesn't mean it's voluntary.
_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
In the dynamic of sexual objectification, and denialism, the other person is nothing other than a toy to be used. The target is depersonalised.. Nothing matters to the abuser other than how the victim’s body can be used to serve his narcissistic desires. Trump's history of intrusive voyeurism at the Miss Universe stuff is another perfect example.
Trump has a long, ugly history of objectifying and dehumanising women. He and Stern spent many hours judging women’s sexual appeal – and in fact, Stern told Trump that he was the world’s greatest judge of women’s beauty , because that was most of what they did together on the radio show.
One of his rape victims may have been a thirteen-year-old girl. There was an investigative report into Trump’s modeling agency that suggests that he has a thing about underage girls. Trump brags about this:
In one Twitter post, he wrote: “’You date girls young enough to be your daughter. That’s perverted.’ No, that’s talent.”
When his daughter Tiffany was a toddler, he commented on her breasts. He has repeatedly commented on his daughter Ivanka’s body, saying that he created her body, and that if she weren’t his daughter, he would date her. He has made creepy comments about wanting to kiss her all the time. (He actually reached for her behind at the Republican National Convention.) He also talked about her with Stern, who said she was a “piece of ass.”
If denialism is the first automatic response of the abuser's cadre, gaslighting is usually the close second.
Gaslighting is a tactic in which an abuser tries to deny the victim’s entire experience of events, making the survivor out as a liar, or acting in bad faith. As an abuser's tactic, it's a classic, and one Trump has often resorted to, as abusers do.
Trump’s so-called “apology” for the tape includes attempts at gaslighting – for example, when he says, “This is nothing more than a distraction from the important issues we’re facing today.” As if to say, “Why are you all making such a big deal out of this? It’s nothing.”
Notice the “but” – a tactic for making an apology not an apology.
ullied, attacked, shamed and intimidated his victims. We will discuss this more in the coming days.”
The third defence these creeps tend to use is the "others do too" response (hey, look over there!").
Many of his supporters do the same as if that justifies Trump's offending.
Trump uses another tactic well known to abusers: when confronted with his own misdeeds, he twists it around to make himself out to be the victim. Trump is an inveterate blame-shifter, and so are many of his apologists.
There are countless examples of this, not just in the realm of sexual assaults. When he was asked about the many small businesses that he stiffed while he built his business empire, he blamed the business owners. “Maybe they just didn’t do a good job,” he said. In other words, if he doesn’t pay his bill, it’s the supplier’s fau
Trying to debate with abuse denialists also runs a predictable course: you soon feel like the person you’re talking to hasn’t heard a word you say. They may continue banging away at the exact same line over and over, as if you haven’t even said anything.
Nevertheless, the hope remains that some light will seep through the cracks.
Roman Polanski is a convicted child rapist, Trump has not been convicted of anything that said I have no idea if he has ever raped or abused anyone in anyway I am not arguing that he hasn't merely that claiming his "grab her by the p****" comment was not an admission of sexual assault but a distasteful joke about how some women are willing to throw themselves at rich and famous men.
If powerful men like Cosby and Weinstein can be guilty of sexual assault, why not Trump, who bragged about being a serial p*ssy grabber?
No he didn't he made a Joke about what rich guys can get away with and how women behave around them.
Exactly. He was making it clear consent was involved. But in order to villify, you have to disregard that part.
Apparently in liberalism a woman allowing a man to touch her vagina is like a Victorian age no no.
I'm sorry, but you have to perform mental gymnastics to get around the fact that Trump was talking about himself. And if anything, rather than being an explanation of getting consent to touch a woman's vagina, this is really about Trump's contempt for women, and use of his status as a rich celebrity to violate them regardless if they wanted it or not.
By very definition if they wanted it then its not a violation. These women are prostitutes they will let ugly old fat guys like Donald have sex with them for a chance at getting rich they are not representative of women in general.
There are plenty of women who say Trump's sexual advances were not welcome at all, but that didn't stop him.
And prostitutes? Bit of a low opinion of the women in question.
Women who are willing to have sex with Trump are attracted to what exactly? His dashing good looks? Charming personality? Witty intellect? No the only think he has going for him is money, these young attractive women only care about that I think most people would agree there is no difference between that and normal prostitution.
But he wasn't talking about women who'd have sex with him just for money, he was talking about women he'd randomly grab up-the-skirt. Consent on their part was nothing that Trump probably ever concerned himself about. It's a matter of respecting another person, rather than dehumanizing him or her. What if Trump was gay, and was randomly grabbing men's penises? Does that mean those men would be prostitutes for reacting with stunned silence? And just because a man or women feels pressured into a sexual situation by a powerful person doesn't mean it's voluntary.
If I made a joke about cutting off people's heads that doesn't mean I have actually cut off anyone's head or supporting cutting off people's heads.
| Similar Topics | |
|---|---|
| Thank you Donald J Trump! |
06 Jul 2026, 5:23 pm |
| Special Interests (women) |
Yesterday, 10:54 pm |
