Dillogic wrote:
Yep
The writing is all over the wall, but the media keep on pushing sensation attached to a specific narrative, which fuels protest groups, which in turn brings out the rare extremists. The advent of the "eyewitness device" has given everyone the ability to see things they'd never see in the majority of a lifetime, and a good portion of people aren't able to see past biases and emotion when viewing these things, and they can't respond with caution--they aren't emotionally intelligent enough to handle it. "Problems" seem worst than what they actually are.
But hey, it's their 1st right.
Naturally, I expect "easy access to powerful weapons" to be a big part of the narrative regarding this incident (even though a man armed with a perfectly acceptable deer rifle would have been able to do the same thing). What about "easy access to powerful imagery devices"? Yeah. Both are arguably silly, as it's ultimately the individual responsible that's to blame (McVeigh is a good example of the same type of extremist).
There is a culture among police in the US (and even here in Australia with black deaths in custody) to expect that a dark skinned person will have something to hide or be more violent towards them. This racial bias is conditioned and probably increases their likelihood of using lethal force when dealing with a black person. The case of Philando Castile illustrates the point given the governor of Minnesota admitted if he was white lethal force would never have been used. This also brings to mind the case of Sandra Bland who was a university student who ended up incarcerated after a routine traffice stop and ended up committing suicide in jail.
Perhaps the police need to nip this in the bud before it escalates again...now with mobile phones and social media the cops can't hide behind lies they were doing their job...