oscuria wrote:
if anyone actually thinks that the the reverend should be put to blame over violent acts committed from his little bonfire (or even the thought of it), then you guys really have a way of dismissing the underlying issue here. this freedom of expression shouldnt be picked and chosen by the wishes of those we deem more important. we shouldnt coddle individuals over invisible lines and barriers. its just downright hypocritical that on the same week the morons who kept bringing up amendment/rights on the mosque at ground zero issue are the same ones protesting this guy.
just get it over with already.
Agreed. Freedom of speech is worthless if someone isn't being offended. It's
all about offending people. Building a mosque and buring Qu'rans should BOTH be allowed. And ignored. (Although I'd argue that the perceived insult over the mosque arises out of western stupidity, an insistence that all Muslims are the same and that peaceful Muslims are somehow behind the extremists. As if your own church was secretly backing KKK atrocities. The Onion story I posted alludes to this stupidity.)
You'd think all those good Christians would listen to their guy and "turn the other cheek" but apparently they missed that sermon. I don't know if Muslims have an equivalent, but they consider Jesus a prophet, so they should be following the same advice even if Mohammad never said it himself. Violence at the insult of having your holy book burned or your prophet captured in a picture is just barbaric and childish and worthy of derision. Grow the hell up! Here in the US, we fight ideas with ideas, not with violence. Put your sword away and get out your pen.