Lecturer At Yale Event Fantasizes About Murdering Whites

Post Reply New Topic

I think only two members here on WP have supported her right to speak to her colleagues about her psychiatric fantasies because
1. She is a psychiatrist/medical doctor
2. She was speaking to an audience of colleagues or fellow psychiatrists and medical doctors
3. She felt the need to share he psychiatric experiences to an audience equipped to understand her cognitions

Her lecture was "The Psychopathic Problem of the White Mind" and it met the brief by organisers as it pertained to mental health.

The doctor used a common technique of disclosure where they assure patients of colour that they are not crazy for having emotional problems created by racism and let them know they are being understood by disclosing their own thoughts or feelings.

In illustrating this technque to her peers she says her words were taken out of context and should not have been taken literally. She claimed that she was trying to move beyond the "dry, bland regurgitation of new vocabulary words with no work in the unconscious” she claims permeates race discourse.

“And, if you want to hit the unconscious, you will have to feel real negative feelings,” she said.

She said the comments she made was a means of dealing with the negative feelings she was experiencing.
“My speaking metaphorically about my own anger was a method for people to reflect on negative feelings,” Khilanani added. “To normalize negative feelings. Because if you don’t, it will turn into a violent action,” she said.

Medical School leaders ultimately decided they would limit access to the video to only those who attended the talk, effectively ensuring only individuals in the Yale community could see it.

The university also added a disclaimer to the video.

“Yale School of Medicine expects the members of our community to speak respectfully to one another and to avoid the use of profanity as a matter of professionalism and acknowledgment of our common humanity. Yale School of Medicine does not condone imagery of violence or racism against any group,” the disclaimer read.

According to Dr Khilanani, “Something is emotionally dangerous about opening up a conversation about race,” she said in the email. “No one wants to look at their actions or face their own negative feelings about what they are doing. The best way to control the narrative is to focus on me, and make me the problem, which is what I stated occurs in the dynamic of racism,” she said in an email to The New York Times.

Nicholas Christakis, a professor at Yale teaching social and natural science, internal medicine and biomedical engineering, said "it's not having disturbing fantasies that is problematic, not even discussing such fantasies in a classroom. Most human beings have disturbing fantasies," and said that it was a proper topic for discussion.

So it seems the discussion has been censored but it was mean't for her colleagues. Where she made a mistake is to underestimate the fragility and insecurity that is associated with any discussion on race and emotion (even among psychiatrists)

This has been an extremely eye opening response by Yale and the general public.

I'd just like to point out that quotes from Cornerstone Speech also weren't censored out of WP. Quoting a racist text to point out that it's racist (or to discuss possible doubts wheather it is racist or not) is not the same as promoting racist content. From our ancient guidelines:

She should have pointed out, at the outset, in opening remarks, the psychoanalytical, metaphorical/symbolic nature of her presentation—as sort of a “trigger warning.”

As far as her speech itself, there are crazy people out there, she is one of them. The real question is why did Yale actually gave her a platform.

Tt's not even a free speech issue. I mean, it is supposed to be a RESEARCH talk, is it not? If someone wants to give "research" talk on something that clearly isn't a research, they would be turned down, no? Especially at the prestigious university such as this. She can have a free speech to talk about it on the streets all she wants. But its weird she was able to get on stage.

And the other question, of course, is why wouldn't they give a stage to a White person describing similar attitude to blacks. Yet they gave her the stage to trash Whites. That shows a huge double standard in American society.

Someone yelled this out in the high school gym,
“I don’t like white bread,
I don’t like white milk,
And I don’t like white people.”
I can understand why she would feel that way.
Now if she yelled out,
“I want to kill white people.”
That would make me fear for my safety.
It also perpetuates the stereotype that all blacks are violent.