history_of_psychiatry wrote:
Israel is always so anal about other countries in the mideast having weapons yet they are the only ones to have nukes. Go figure.
Israel isn't threatening to destroy other countries with their nukes.
Wombat wrote:
Imagine this headline:
"Russian navy boards US freighter in international waters and seizes hundreds of tons of armaments bound for Israel" (or Iraq, or South Korea or wherever)
Now I would have thought that boarding a ship in international waters is piracy if done by individuals and an act of war if done by a government.
But in our brave new world some pirates are more legal than others.
Israel can bomb and invade Lebanon or Syria and that is somehow ok.
America can bomb it's own ally Pakistan and that is somehow ok too.
But what if (say) Sweden decided to bomb (say) Poland?
That really would be a big deal.
You're not really making any concise point with these irrelevant ramblings. The weapons were for Hezbollah, a group which was created and is still dedicated to destroying Israel. Alone these weapons couldn't have done it but with these actions Hezbollah is seemingly looking to bring Lebanon into another conflict with Israel, and the government does nothing about it, even though UN resolution 1701 asked them to disarm all armed groups.
Yeah, the IDF should have let the ship dock, seen the arms be transported to Hezbollah, then another war could break out with hundreds/thousands of civilians dead on both sides, at least they could say that they didn't break any international piracy laws!