FBI's new rape definition ensnares TSA'ers as serial rapists
This is a half a year old piece of news, but it must not pass unnoticed.... especially since the TSA "pat-downs" and nude scans are on their way to get extended for trains and other forms of mass transit, too, as well as cruise ships (>link<) (meaning, depending on where you want to move, you soon can't even permanently leave the U.S., anymore, without being violated). I'm sure it will pass mostly unnoticed, anyway, though, considering the clear, overwhelming apathy of the great majority of the American people. One shouldn't need to have an organization like the FBI tell you it is wrong, to begin with... that thought should come naturally, should it not? Any pervert who, on the street, would do what the TSA does, would get the cops called on them, instantly. Yet, when these TSA scum workers do it (on mission of the even scummier government, though, of course), it is acceptable to the majority of Americans. Collective Stockholm syndrome...?
http://current.com/community/93572419_f ... apists.htm
Excerpts from the article:
So in October, the FBI's UCR subcommittee Advisory Policy Board voted to recommend the definition be expanded. The new definition of rape, which looks set to be "officially" adopted by the FBI in 2012, is as follows:
"Rape" is: ...penetration, no matter how slight, of the vagina or anus with any body part or object, or oral penetration by a sex organ of another person, without the consent of the victim."
FBI's definition ensnares TSA agents as serial rapists
Here's the kicker in all this: According to this definition of rape, the federal government's TSA agents are serial rapists.
That's because, in the course of carrying out their lewd, improper and entirely illegal strip-searches and "enhanced pat-downs," they are engaged in precisely the acts covered in the FBI's definition of rape. Namely, entering the vagina and anus with their fingers without consent of the victim.
This means the next time you are fingered by a TSA agent in an airport you should seriously call the FBI and report a sex crime. In fact, it is illegal for you to not report a sex offender committing a crime of which you are directly aware. Failure to do so could make you an accomplice in that person's next sex crime, legally speaking.
Is the TSA really committing these sex crimes in America today? Yes, absolutely. Gov. Jesse Ventura's lawsuit against the TSA goes into great detail about precisely these kinds of violation.
/ ... /
What we're looking at here is government-sanctioned sex offenders who are feeling up our children, teenage daughters, wives, mothers and grandmothers, routinely raping them, and then getting away with it day after day! And, astonishingly, there are only a handful of alternative media people who seem to care about this, with myself being one of the most outspoken. What I have learned in all this is that feminist groups don't care if their women get raped by government agents because they don't say a word against it.
Where are women's' organizations in taking a stand against serial rapists working at the airport?
In recent protests about expanding the definition of rape, one woman held up a sign that read, "TAKE RAPE SERIOUSLY."
Except, not if the government is raping people, apparently. Because when the government rapes women in plain daylight, women's groups remain eerily silent and don't take it seriously at all.
In a recent article, I called out the National Organization for Women (NOW) for its total silence on the issue of government TSA agents molesting and physically abusing women at airports (http://www.naturalnews.com/034323_N...). Why is rape wrong in the workplace, but rape is totally acceptable at the airport as long as it's carried out by a government agent?
/ ... /
Links (and more) in original article.
_________________
"War is Peace
Freedom is Slavery
Ignorance is Strength."
jojobean
Veteran
Joined: 12 Aug 2009
Age: 49
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,341
Location: In Georgia sipping a virgin pina' colada while the rest of the world is drunk
couldnt agree more. I have not flown since they started this and besides I have found even though car rides are much more expensive on long distance trips, they are alot more fun than flying anyway.
Groups are coming out about this, but the media is not talking about it. ACLU has been working on putting a case together for a lawsuit.
Most americans dont know this because they never lived in a communist country, but we are in the beginning stages of communism because communism countries are basically hyper-surveillance societies.
Orwell was a prophet
_________________
All art is a kind of confession, more or less oblique. All artists, if they are to survive, are forced, at last, to tell the whole story; to vomit the anguish up.
-James Baldwin
Haha TSA just got pwned by their buddies in the FBI. Load mag, release safety, rack chamber, point at foot, pull trigger. ![]()
_________________
"Yeah, so this one time, I tried playing poker with tarot cards... got a full house, and about four people died." ~ Unknown comedian
Happy New Year from WP's resident fortune-teller! May the cards be ever in your favor.
They are actually penetrating now? I wouldn't even be able to stand a patdown. That is one of the two main reasons that I'll never fly again. If I were to attempt to fly and they wanted to do that to me I'd have to refuse.
That sucks that they want to do that to trains too. What about Greyhound buses? I guess I'm never traveling again.
OliveOilMom
Veteran
Joined: 11 Nov 2011
Age: 62
Gender: Female
Posts: 11,447
Location: About 50 miles past the middle of nowhere
I don't think they do actual cavity searches. Also, you are free to walk away at any time and not fly if the pat downs bother you. Pat downs aren't rape by a long shot.
The pat downs and scans wouldn't bother me at all, what would bother me about flying is that the plane is up in the sky. I am afraid of the actual flying itself, not some security measures. I would be much more damaged by the plane crashing than I would be by having someone pat me down.
When you go to visit someone in prison you have to be patted down. Is that evil as well? It's just as much a choice to fly as it is to visit someone in prison. In fact, the pat downs at the prison are probably more embarrassing than the ones at the airport because I have to go into a room with a lady guard and not only do I get patted down but I have to lift up my shirt and shake my bra out in case I'm smuggling something in my bra.
I also really doubt the people doing the pat downs, either at the airport or at the prison, are getting off on them in any way.
_________________
I'm giving it another shot. We will see.
My forum is still there and everyone is welcome to come join as well. There is a private women only subforum there if anyone is interested. Also, there is no CAPTCHA.
The link to the forum is http://www.rightplanet.proboards.com
That isn't what I've heard. I've heard of people being detained and given a hard time when refusing. Also what if it were to happen on the way back? How would I get home? Even if the airport didn't give me a hard time I'm sure anyone I was traveling with would have a fit if I ruined their plans by refusing or wasted their money spent on the ticket if they didn't get a refund. I'd just rather avoid all this trouble by not flying at all.
Yes. I've never visited anyone in prison and never would. I understand why they do that because that is a big way for drugs to get smuggled in (I watched Oz) but I wouldn't subject myself to that. If anyone I know ends up in prison they'll just have to settle for phone calls and letters.
It doesn't matter to me whether the person doing it is getting off or not. I don't like being touched at all and certainly not in my intimate areas by strangers without my consent.
OliveOilMom
Veteran
Joined: 11 Nov 2011
Age: 62
Gender: Female
Posts: 11,447
Location: About 50 miles past the middle of nowhere
The last time I went to visit my brother in law, I mentioned to the girl who was searching me "You must hate this" and she laughed and said "You have no idea how much I hate this, but you wouldn't believe some of the things people try to sneak in here and some of the places they put them" and we both laughed about that and then we talked about how stupid people ruin things for the rest of us.
Instead of getting mad at the TSA why aren't some of you putting the blame where it belongs, on the people who try to blow up the airplanes?
_________________
I'm giving it another shot. We will see.
My forum is still there and everyone is welcome to come join as well. There is a private women only subforum there if anyone is interested. Also, there is no CAPTCHA.
The link to the forum is http://www.rightplanet.proboards.com
The people that blow up the airplanes aren't the ones trying to feel me up.
I'm not exactly getting mad at anyone. I'm just saying that because of this I can't fly.
OliveOilMom
Veteran
Joined: 11 Nov 2011
Age: 62
Gender: Female
Posts: 11,447
Location: About 50 miles past the middle of nowhere
The people that blow up the airplanes aren't the ones trying to feel me up.
I'm not exactly getting mad at anyone. I'm just saying that because of this I can't fly.
I don't mean that you are getting mad. Some people do though.
If it wasn't for nutjobs trying to blow up planes then they wouldn't need all those other security measures. People probably realize that they aren't going to get away with getting bombs or weapons on board, because of the searches, so they don't try now.
_________________
I'm giving it another shot. We will see.
My forum is still there and everyone is welcome to come join as well. There is a private women only subforum there if anyone is interested. Also, there is no CAPTCHA.
The link to the forum is http://www.rightplanet.proboards.com
That sucks that they want to do that to trains too. What about Greyhound buses? I guess I'm never traveling again.
If they're doing security searches for Greyhounds then that's the first I've heard of it. I rode a Greyhound bus to visit Casper last spring, and I'm planning to do it again this July (same reason, visiting girlfriend, although it's a different girl this time, and I'm keeping at least a knife on me in case I run into the first one, just for my own defense of course). The first time there were barely any security searches, even at the main hub in Denver. I know because the entire trip I had a small pocketknife in my pocket, which was explicitly banned by the travel rules, but no one even searched me to find it. Of course I only carried it due to it being my first time on a Greyhound, and I was a bit paranoid about the possibility of being attacked by other passengers due to the kind of people that usually utilize Greyhound buses (generally lower-class Americans, some of them who have outstanding criminal records or are mentally unstable. I'm not stereotyping, it's just statistically speaking they're a higher risk because of the motivation for criminal activity.) That said, my worries were in vain, most of the people I rode with were very interesting and I ended up having a lot of fun just talking to them.
_________________
"Yeah, so this one time, I tried playing poker with tarot cards... got a full house, and about four people died." ~ Unknown comedian
Happy New Year from WP's resident fortune-teller! May the cards be ever in your favor.
That isn't what I've heard. I've heard of people being detained and given a hard time when refusing...
This is true, refusal means you must have something to hide is their assumption.
I would say that there are three relevant issues:
1) To what extent are TSA searches invasive? While pat downs certainly involve physical touching, I am not persuaded that they properly involve any penetration of the relevant parts of the body.
2) Consent authorizes behaviour. Every person is free to refuse to submit themselves to search, provided that the person is willing to forego their contractual entitlement to fly. When you buy a ticket from an airline, you buy it subject to all of the airline's "conditions of carriage," one of which is that you will submit yourself to pre-boarding security screening. If you don't like the conditions of carriage, then you can fly privately or drive.
3) TSA agents are undertaking an activity that is authorized by statute--and one statute cannot criminalize behaviour that is authorized by a different statute. Now, if TSA agents are exceeding their authority (by, for example, conducting an unauthorized cavity search), then the issue of unreasonable search may arise. But so long as the searches are voluntary and non-invasive, I see no basis for the reasoning containined in the article.
_________________
--James
