Fnord wrote:
Why are you people so ready to believe the woman's claim and not the man's? Are you prejudiced against celebrities? Are you expressing sexist bigotry toward men? Are you just interested in seeing a wealthy person squirm as he fights to uphold his reputation?
Or are you all just stupid enough to believe every woman who claims that she was raped by a wealthy man, without her ever producing any material evidence to support her claim?
A valid point. There has been a trial by media and yes, the public like seeing celebrities embroiled in controversy. However, as with the Bill Cosby case, the "preliminary" anecdotal evidence suggests that there is a case to investigate. Both Bill Clinton and Prince Andrew has constant contact with Epstein and were guests at his residence. The Case of Clinton there was a coincidental abrupt end to the phone records immediately after allegations over Epstein's pedophilia surfaced.
Given the Rolf Harris and Jimmy Saville allegations proved they were a callous users of young girls then this psychological profile among older male celebrities is a likelihood. I am however, a little confused about the thousands of under-aged groupies who have been sexually exploited by rock stars since the time of the Beatles? How are their exploitation any different from the girls used by Epstein??