camerawoman fired for tripping refugees intends to sue them

Post Reply New Topic

(clicky)Hungarian camerawoman fired for intentionally tripping refugee, to sue one of them she tripped, for denigrating her "honor."
honestly, you can't make this stuff up. how much lower can some people go?

Apparently, he was from al nusra front.

http://rudaw.net/NewsDetails.aspx?pageid=159906

he was no angel but that does not magically transform the ex-camerawoman into one.

Eh.

If I tried running across a border, I'd expect to be apprehended by force.

but not by a stupid cameraperson. that has nothing to do with the fundamental lack of decency exhibited by a thug suing her victim.

I'm writing this assuming you are American, because statistically that is most likely the case as Americans seem to be the primary demographic posting here. If that is not the case, then disregard this post.

I think you should invite al nusra front to live in your home. Then you are eligible to have an opinion about Europes attitude towards migrants.

It's very easy to post politically correct opinions from the USA when you yourself do not have to deal with the consequences of millions of people from radicalized countries pouring in en masse, effectively drowning out the native population, which by definition is genocide of those people.

It's quite arrogant to point the finger from the most war mongering country in the world and shame Europe for not being humanitarian enough.

We have quite simply had enough of the high and mighty world police stirring up trouble and then abandoning responsibility, leaving it to us, using NATO and the UN to blackmail us through their internationalist mafia to "take our share".

I couldn't agree more! Where I live there are many policies made by the US that may very well be good in the US, however, those policicies where I live do not work. A perfect example is the minimum wage forced here by the US. In the US you can find many jobs that pay over 10-12USD an hour, not here...thus paying the same minimum wage here has created a huge welfare system because that pays much more than even the median income does here.

Unless one lives in the country, one has no clue at all of the realities of that country. Easy to force the US agenda on others, when they are not the ones living with the consequences of such agendas.

Exactly, and before anyone calls me "anti-American", then I want to make it clear that my stance is actually pro-American since the warmongering is a huge drain in the American economy and doesn't really serve American interests. To rewind back a decade and a half: If the Iraq and Afghanistan invasions could somehow be justified, which they can't be, then by far, the U.S has overstayed their welcome in the middle east. There always seem to be a reason to stir up trouble somewhere. Taking into account that US pays money directly to Israel as well, thanks to AIPAC and other "special interest organizations", then one can ask exactly how much the warmongering is in US interest, or if it isn't rather the interest of Israel, whose expansionistic policies has killed over 600 000 Palestinians since the mid 20th century, and doesn't show signs of coming to a halt as "peace talks" are always subject to terms and conditions that rarely are represented accurately in the media anyway.

I'm pro solidarity more than anything else, which is why America needs to stop the war machine. Let the middle easteners sort out their own conflicts.
Migrants come to Europe thinking we all signed some door to door petition to stir up trouble in the middle east when the fact of the matter is that we were blackmailed by NATO and the UN which works as a mafia to threaten countries to participate in warmongering, else they "lose diplomatic benefits" which is a very mild way to put it. It basically means that we end up on the blacklist of the internationalist alliance. I'm not going to elaborate too much of this, but it's all pretty self-explanatory.

So they come here thinking we all wanted war. None of us wanted it. Not one! We are the victim of our "democracies", whose parliamentary spiel just cherry picks opinions and represents the picture that serves their agenda the best. This is particularly visible when you look at how biased they are in portraying the mass migration, using shaming tactics to legitimize the constant influx of migrants, without much screening. Anyone could slip in hidden in the mass of people flooding the borders.

Thank goodness they at least pointed out how the neighboring arab gulf states have taken in exactly zero refugees. Not a word about Israel though. Maybe the OP ought to start a petition to shame the gulf states and Israel to blow their borders wide open. After all, the journey from Syria is much shorter to reach those destinations. Actually, they cross many countries where there is peace, but the target is usually Germany, Sweden and Norway, because we have the best welfare states. That won't last for long though. But money in, money out seems to be too difficult a principle for the average idealist to understand.

I blame the evangelicals in the US most of all for their support of republicans, zionists and their warmachine. It is a never-ending drain in the economy and upholds the conflict in the middle east, effectively keeping the refugee machine going. Trillions of debt are largely thanks to post 9/11 warmongering, which never, ever seems to end.

The key to peace lies in the US simply saying no to participate in "intervention". Russias strike against ISIS has been heavily condemned by the media, but it's always okay when the US does it. Without exception.

A lot of the migrants coming to Europe now are actually wealthy, because they have to pay people smugglers upwards of $2000, which leaves behind the most needy, that is, families who have been bombed out of their homes and have zero resources.

What about them? Most of the people pouring in seem to be angry, muscular young men in their prime, leaving women and children behind to fend for themselves. Not to generalize or draw any conclusions or anything, but they seem like perfect jihad candidates to me.

This begins and ends with the key players in the UN and NATO, because we are all dragged along against our will so it is largely up to you Americans to start criticising and calling them out. Blaming surface incidents like this topic, doesn't get to the root of the problem. Stop the warmongering, and everything else falls into place eventually.

Assad is no angel, but it seems to me that certain alliances are all too eager to force "democracy" upon the Syrian population, and I use the term democracy rather loosely, since European countries have these "democracies" yet they have no say in the matter when it comes to participating in wars, being at the mercy of the EU, UN and NATO.

From the point of view of a "war-mongering" American, it seems to me that because we spend a lot of our money defending you, you enjoy a better standard of living than you would if you had to pay for your own.
I am all for pulling out of Europe, both physically and diplomatically. I could care less if you peace loving Europeans went back to your favorite past-time, slaughtering each other.
Never forget that the purpose of the NATO treaty organization wasn't just to keep the Soviets off your front lawn, it was also to keep you Euros from setting the world on fire again.
The best solution for us is to pull out completely and when you go back to war ( you will, you can't help yourselves) stay out of it and convince the rest of the world to do likewise.

It isn't about the camerawoman tripping an Islamic militant, it's about her tripping a man carrying his child.

^^^sometimes, politics can make for some nasty bedfellows.

^^What he said.

the fact that she is now suing the guy is basically adding insult to injury.

Thank you.

She shouldn't have tripped someone (especially someone carrying a kid ). The fact that she's now suing the victims of this incident just further illustrates the type of person she is.

Genocide is when you kill a group of people in mass, not because the racial demographic of an area changes.

Also, regardless of ones opinions on the refugees you don't sue someone because you assaulted them....purposely tripping someone doesn't mean you sue the person you chose to purposely trip. Also you act like all of us here completely and entirely support any and everything our government does or has done....we're not all just a bunch of crazy war mongerers here.

Perhaps Europe does need to change its policies....and make sure its not catering to migrants over the citizens, but its not really the fault of the U.S that some countries in europe are push overs about dealing with migrants.

Like I forget where in europe but supposedly Muslims there get to use a special court outside the normal one for legal matters....obviously that is a B.S push over policy, but its not like things like that 'have' to occur if immigrants are allowed into a country.

Don't get me wrong the United States certainly hasn't helped matters, with the whole destabilizing of the entire middle east just about and laying the breeding grounds for ISIS...and even now they just push the issue on other nations, but at the same time it seems many european nations are also trying to push the issue elsewhere to. I mean no country in the world wants the muslim refugees so the world will have to compromise...sending them back to war torn wasteland and genocide are not viable options.

That said unless the country your from hasn't been involved at all in the destabilization of the middle east, then its your countries problem to. A lot of Europe initially did support the U.S retaliation of 9-11, then the war in Iraq and have still been involved in the conflicts over there....so its not just the U.S that created this mess, european governments helped to.