EzraS wrote:
Fnord wrote:
firemonkey wrote:
So it's a green light for catholic priests to molest young children?
More like a yellow light against people who are only after the money...Reuters wrote:
... The father of alleged victim said: "I am heartbroken on this verdict and will continue a civil claim..."
Hard to say if it's about being after the money or the only means left to make someone pay for their crimes. Like when the Goldmans sued O.J. Simpson. That seemed a lot more about depriving Simpson than cashing in.
I wonder what it is that leads to this cynical attitude that treats anyone who continues to use their last legal option for anything resembling justice as just looking to cash-in. Like, are those people willing to consider what alternatives someone is left with at that point?
Among things, pursuing justice is expensive, removing cash from the perpetrator is a form of punishment, even if it's not the form one might want to see, and it's the last means of recourse available for law-abiding folks. I don't think society would benefit if everyone took the approach I would be tempted to take even if no one could try to pretend it was about money if one chose to pursue extra-legal methods. Most of us benefit from society not forcing us to 'get our hands dirty', and if that means accepting financial compensation instead of something that might be more emotionally rewarding, most of us, in the long-run would prefer that's how things be handled.
_________________
There's no such thing as a free market.If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing. —Malcolm XJust a reminder: under international law, an occupying power has no right of self-defense, and those who are occupied have the right and duty to liberate themselves by any means possible.