Confederate supporters replacing or moving removed monuments

Page 1 of 1 [ 6 posts ] 

ASPartOfMe
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Aug 2013
Age: 68
Gender: Male
Posts: 39,637
Location: Long Island, New York

26 Jul 2020, 10:17 am

As Confederate monuments tumble, die-hards are erecting replacements

Quote:
The teardowns get all the attention, Walter “Donnie” Kennedy grumbles.

Every time a local government votes to remove a century-old Confederate war monument, every time activists swing ropes around statues and yank them to the ground, “our enemies claim victory again,” said Kennedy, the chief of heritage operations for the Sons of Confederate Veterans. “We know America doesn’t agree with us — heck, they fought a war against us — but we’re going to tell our story.”

Their membership might be dwindling, and their popular support seems to shrink by the day, but the guardians of America’s 700-plus Confederate monuments are mounting a serious defense — filing lawsuits and demanding control of statues slated for removal.

They, too, are launching a concerted offensive.

The Sons of Confederate Veterans and, in a quieter way, the United Daughters of the Confederacy, the group that erected many of the monuments that are now the target of the biggest removal campaign in history, are pushing back by building new statues, buying land to house torn-down memorials, and airing radio and online ads seeking public support for their cause.

Across the South, more than 20 new monuments, ranging from small plaques to massive Confederate battle flags placed near major interstate highways for maximum visibility, have been installed on private property in the past few years, said Larry McCluney Jr., commander in chief of the Sons group.

Joshua Stover, a Sons leader in Selma, Ala., created Monuments Across Dixie to build tributes to Confederate soldiers, Gen. Robert E. Lee, and others. McCluney called the drive a response to “organizations that are tracking all our historical monuments so they can attack them or desecrate them.”

I totally understand the public’s views against Confederate monuments,” said McCluney, a high school history teacher in Mississippi. “I truly understand how some people feel these are monuments to white supremacy. But for the descendants of thousands of men who died in the war, these monuments are the only headstone their families have. We have to learn from history good and bad. Right now, we’re just the low-hanging fruit of an eradication of American history.”

Nationwide, more than 60 Confederate monuments have been taken down this year, almost all of them dating from the turn of the 20th century, when hundreds of statues were erected to honor fallen husbands and fathers but also to assert white supremacy during a time when states passed Jim Crow laws enforcing separation of the races.

Most of the removals, whether by vote of local government or by activists taking matters into their own hands, have occurred in midsize or large cities. Protests against monuments took place this spring in dozens of small towns, but few of those structures have come down.

Conflicts over monuments have been a constant in American history, dating to an attack in 1771 against a statue of King George III at the southern tip of Manhattan.

But in some places, the Confederate groups offer elected officials a relatively easy way to dispose of — or to protect — their monument. In Parksley, Va., a town of 800 on the Eastern Shore, council members voted last month to sell their statue of a Confederate soldier to the Sons group for $1, with the proviso that the monument remain unchanged.

An inscription on the monument reads: “They fought for conscience sake and died for right.”
Critics in town said the sale was designed to buffer public officials from activists’ demand that they remove the statue.

“This monument is town property, and the effort to move it into private hands is a way to remove residents’ ability to demand change,” said Jay Ford, 37, who is leading a drive to raise $10,000 to offer the town a counterbid for the 30-foot-tall granite statue and the land on which it sits. Ford’s group would then build a monument to the area’s black and native residents, as well as a plaque providing historical context for the Confederate statue.

“These symbols set the tone and tell the story of a place,” Ford said. “We’re not insisting that the Confederate monument come down. We want to meet the community where they are. But we are trying to reclaim this space and make it more inclusive. What’s there now sends a message to people of color that they’re not welcome here.”

Despite the organization’s public silence, many towns are turning to the UDC to take custody of monuments. In Loudoun County, Va., a second-ring suburb of Washington, supervisors unanimously voted this month to take down a Confederate statue and return it to the UDC.

“I don’t care what happens to this statue, as long as it never again sits on public property,” said Board of Supervisors Chairwoman Phyllis Randall (D-At Large). “I take this vote in the name of thousands of Loudoun citizens, black citizens who never had a voice and sometimes didn’t have a vote.”

In some towns, the Daughters have chosen not to get involved. In Luray, Va., 90 miles west of D.C., a group that organized on Facebook seeking to relocate the town’s two Confederate monuments has no objection to the Daughters taking control of a statue originally built by a now-defunct Confederate Memorial Association. But the Daughters don’t want to claim the monument, and the town attorney isn’t certain who owns it.

“We don’t want to see them destroyed,” said Chris Hurlbert, founder of the relocation advocacy group, who grew up near Luray and lives in New York City, where he works in advertising. “We do believe these statues stand for oppression and there’s something beautiful about destroying them, but the respectful thing would be to preserve them as history that’s important to some people. I believe they prop up white supremacy, but a lot of people in the area feel the statues represent the story of their ancestors, and that’s fair.”

The relocation group wants the more artistically interesting statue, which depicts a Confederate soldier looking tattered and downcast, moved to a museum, and the other piece, a mass-produced sculpture identical to hundreds of others around the country, put in a battlefield or cemetery.

A consensus on the statues’ fate does not seem close, both sides agree.

Even as such debates stretch on, the Sons are busy raising money to buy land, erect new monuments and fly enormous Confederate battle flags like the 30-foot-by-60-foot one that waved prominently over an intersection of two interstate highways in Tampa for the past decade. Last month, it was lowered because of threats to set it ablaze.
The Sons say they are undeterred.

“All that has been lost can be regained,” Kennedy said. “We’re not going away. Billy Bible and Joe Sixpack are going to hear our message. We’re going to find peaceful ways to put our finger in our enemies’ eye. We have to tell our story or else our enemies will tell theirs.”


_________________
“Self Acceptance is a process not a performance”
“You are autistic enough. And you always have been”

Professionally Identified and joined WP August 26, 2013
DSM 5: Autism Spectrum Disorder, DSM IV: Aspergers Moderate Severity.


Last edited by ASPartOfMe on 26 Jul 2020, 10:32 am, edited 2 times in total.

Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 May 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 60,948
Location:      

26 Jul 2020, 10:28 am

Pro-Confederacy = Pro-Slavery

Confederate sympathizers are not even worth the effort to spit on.


_________________
The mere fact that science may not yet adequately explain an object, event, or experience does not mean the immediate explanation should automatically default to a conspiratorial, extraterrestrial, paranormal, or supernatural cause.


Sweetleaf
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Age: 36
Gender: Female
Posts: 35,278
Location: Somewhere in Colorado

26 Jul 2020, 10:55 am

I just don't get why someone would support the confederacy. Let alone support the confederacy and act like they are actually patriotic while flying that traitor flag.


_________________
Tis the time to melt the Ice.


Sylkat
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Sep 2011
Gender: Female
Posts: 17,425

27 Jul 2020, 1:16 pm

NOT glorifying or excusing 200+ years of inhumanity;
BUT;
That war was fought to make rich people, many of them wealthy Northern ship owners, STOP continuing to abduct, ‘transport’, and degrade human beings until the day of their merciful death.
They were forcing more and MORE abducted victims here to suffer.
It was not just about releasing thousands and thousands of broken, brainwashed people from bondage worse than some animals, it was about an entire economy built upon this constant brutality.
SOME statues and mansions and museum exhibits need to stay visible and beautiful and proud to remind us constantly what we are all capable of, AND JUSTIFYING AND EXCUSING.


_________________
Sylkat
Student Body President, Miskatonic University


Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 May 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 60,948
Location:      

27 Jul 2020, 1:27 pm

Sure, leave slave-built buildings intact if they serve a practical function.  Yes, leave the slaves' former quarters intact to show the squalor in which slaves were forced to live.  Certainly, preserve the photographs that reveal the actual scars of actual slaves who had been whipped and beaten to show the hideous cruelty of their "masters".

Let's simply refrain from glorifying the slave-owners and those who defended slave-based societies -- both in the Confederacy and the rest of antebellum America.  Tear down their statues and recycle the materials used to make them into something more practical -- bronze artificial limbs and marble roadbed foundations, for example.

So if the faces and figures carved into both Mount Rushmore AND Stone Mountain (e.g., the largest shrine to white supremacy in the history of the world) were to be forcibly removed, I would not object at all.


_________________
The mere fact that science may not yet adequately explain an object, event, or experience does not mean the immediate explanation should automatically default to a conspiratorial, extraterrestrial, paranormal, or supernatural cause.


kraftiekortie
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 4 Feb 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 87,510
Location: Queens, NYC

27 Jul 2020, 1:38 pm

I happen to like Teddy Roosevelt......though even he was an ass in certain aspects.