Gay Marriage is now legal in Connecticut

Page 1 of 3 [ 37 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

philosopherBoi
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Aug 2008
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,255

10 Oct 2008, 3:20 pm

Quote:
HARTFORD, Connecticut (CNN) -- The Connecticut Supreme Court ruled Friday that gay and lesbian couples have the right to get married.

The ruling makes Connecticut the third state, after Massachusetts and California, to decide its constitution mandates treating citizens equally when applying for marriage licenses, regardless of their sexual orientation.

"Interpreting our state constitutional provisions in accordance with firmly established equal protection principles leads inevitably to the conclusion that gay persons are entitled to marry the otherwise qualified same sex partner of their choice," the ruling said.

"To decide otherwise would require us to apply one set of constitutional principles to gay persons and another to all others. The guarantee of equal protection under the law, and our obligation to uphold that command, forbids us from doing so. In accordance with these state constitutional requirements, same sex couples cannot be denied the freedom to marry."

The decision would only allow gay couples the state benefits of marriage. The Defense of Marriage Act, passed in 1996, denies gay couples federal recognition of state marriages, which provides for federal benefits with regard to Social Security, taxation, immigration and others.

Connecticut, Vermont, New Hampshire and New Jersey have civil unions.

In 2005, Connecticut began to allow civil unions, intended to be marriage in all but name, without being forced by its courts. Two years later, Connecticut's Legislature tabled a bill allowing marriage.

Eight same-sex couple sued the state, saying that civil unions were not equal to marriage and that Connecticut's Constitution guaranteed them equal treatment.

In the dissent, one justice said he disagreed with the majority's opinion that "sexual orientation is a quasi-suspect class under our state constitutional provisions guaranteeing equal protection of the laws" because that point of view "unduly minimizes the unique and extraordinary political power of gay persons in this state."

A representative of Connecticut's commissioner of public health said he does not know when the state might start issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples.

The suit was called Kerrigan and Mock v. the Connecticut Department of Public Health.


http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/10/10/connec ... pstoryview

I am so happy, equality is taking root in the United States of America, looks like the GLBT community will no longer be second class citizens.


_________________
When Jesus Christ said love thy neighbor he was not making a suggestion he was stating the law of god.


Fogman
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Jun 2005
Age: 59
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,986
Location: Frå Nord Dakota til Vermont

10 Oct 2008, 3:40 pm

Good Deal. There's still plenty of places in the US where gay people will be considered second class citizens though. --Namely states where people voted to amend their state's constitution to define marriage as strictly between a man and a woman, and not to honor other states definitions of marriage.


_________________
When There's No There to get to, I'm so There!


philosopherBoi
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Aug 2008
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,255

10 Oct 2008, 4:07 pm

However with another state legalizing gay marriage things can start to change however I think things will just get plain nasty before its all over with.


_________________
When Jesus Christ said love thy neighbor he was not making a suggestion he was stating the law of god.


MissPickwickian
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Nov 2007
Age: 34
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,044
Location: Tennessee

10 Oct 2008, 4:18 pm

Coolness...I just hope the republicans don't try to turn it into a wedge issue again.


_________________
Powered by quotes since 7/25/10


philosopherBoi
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Aug 2008
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,255

10 Oct 2008, 4:29 pm

MissPickwickian wrote:
Coolness...I just hope the republicans don't try to turn it into a wedge issue again.


Hun they are going to try however I think this year partially the entire country will be going BLUE.


_________________
When Jesus Christ said love thy neighbor he was not making a suggestion he was stating the law of god.


SilverPikmin
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 1 Aug 2008
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 360
Location: Merseyside, England, UK

10 Oct 2008, 5:32 pm

Good. That's a move forward in my opinion.



TheMidnightJudge
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Mar 2007
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,676
Location: New England

10 Oct 2008, 6:57 pm

Yeah, we're progressing, but even as we transcend our problems we find new ones.


_________________
Sleepless gliding


ShadesOfMe
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Jun 2004
Age: 35
Gender: Female
Posts: 16,983
Location: California

10 Oct 2008, 8:51 pm

YES! Score! :) This is great. :)



DiabloDave363
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 May 2008
Age: 32
Gender: Male
Posts: 544
Location: New England

10 Oct 2008, 8:58 pm

YEEEEEEEEEEEEAH!



chocoholic
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 21 May 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 329
Location: At a Chocoholics Anonymous meeting

10 Oct 2008, 9:32 pm

It should be legal in all 50 states. But this is a good starting point.



oscuria
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jan 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,748

10 Oct 2008, 9:49 pm

yes, now all the gays can give birth to children without being single parents!


_________________
sticks and stones may kill you.


philosopherBoi
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Aug 2008
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,255

10 Oct 2008, 9:53 pm

oscuria wrote:
yes, now all the gays can give birth to children without being single parents!


Do you have something get us fags perhaps?


_________________
When Jesus Christ said love thy neighbor he was not making a suggestion he was stating the law of god.


BokeKaeru
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Jun 2008
Age: 38
Gender: Female
Posts: 535
Location: Boston, MA

10 Oct 2008, 10:17 pm

oscuria wrote:
yes, now all the gays can give birth to children without being single parents!


If having children is necessarily the purpose of marriage, why are infertile, old or decidedly childless straight couples allowed to marry?

But yeah, I'm happy about the news as well. I have the feeling that relatively soon, banning same-sex marriage will seem as backwards and outlandish as the laws against mixed-race marriage.



ShadesOfMe
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Jun 2004
Age: 35
Gender: Female
Posts: 16,983
Location: California

10 Oct 2008, 10:49 pm

BokeKaeru wrote:
oscuria wrote:
yes, now all the gays can give birth to children without being single parents!


If having children is necessarily the purpose of marriage, why are infertile, old or decidedly childless straight couples allowed to marry?

But yeah, I'm happy about the news as well. I have the feeling that relatively soon, banning same-sex marriage will seem as backwards and outlandish as the laws against mixed-race marriage.


I agree with you Boke. also, they technically are not single parents if they are with a partner.



BokeKaeru
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Jun 2008
Age: 38
Gender: Female
Posts: 535
Location: Boston, MA

10 Oct 2008, 11:36 pm

ShadesOfMe wrote:
BokeKaeru wrote:
oscuria wrote:
yes, now all the gays can give birth to children without being single parents!


If having children is necessarily the purpose of marriage, why are infertile, old or decidedly childless straight couples allowed to marry?

But yeah, I'm happy about the news as well. I have the feeling that relatively soon, banning same-sex marriage will seem as backwards and outlandish as the laws against mixed-race marriage.


I agree with you Boke. also, they technically are not single parents if they are with a partner.


Quite so. O_o I thought the stigma of being raised by unmarried parents was gone and done with a while ago... Perhaps not after all. I look forward to seeing any counter-arguments to these points.



Fidget
Supporting Member
Supporting Member

User avatar

Joined: 29 Jun 2008
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 919
Location: Illinois, US

10 Oct 2008, 11:36 pm

oscuria wrote:
yes, now all the gays can give birth to children without being single parents!


What does that even mean?

Anyways, yay Conneticut! :D