maybe I should quit my faith and deny God to everyone

Post Reply New Topic

Personally, I kind of think God is like one of those writers of British black comedies. He dreams up the most bizarre, pointless, annoying scenarios and then laughs his ass off, saying to the angels "You wouldn't believe what I made Mrs Smith do the other day..."

Amnos, evolution of one species into another has been observed among bacteria. The problem with observing it among most other species is the sheer length of time that it takes for most macrofauna to reproduce - even fruit flies take a couple of days per generation. Given the amount of time that it takes for environmental pressures to make a given species inadequate, giving mutants room to survive, it's not surprising that the phenomenon hasn't been observed in the wild. However, by comparing fossilized remains of earlier creatures to their modern versions, the changes can be observed - for instance, the ancestors of the modern rhinoceros were quite furry (as revealed by samples trapped in mud), but as the planet warmed at the end of the last glaciation, a nearly-hairless mutant became better able to survive, thus living longer, reproducing more, and eventually displacing their hairy ancestors.

Cyberscan, unchanging belief is one of the characteristics of religion, not science. Yes, a less-complete fossil record had led to incorrect conclusions about evolutionary paths before - paths that have been altered in the light of later discoveries. Your conclusion is akin to asserting that since "natural philosophers" once believed that fire was caused by substances that gave off phlogiston, and later learned that fire is actually caused by combination with a previously-undiscovered gas called "oxygen", we can therefore dismiss all of chemistry as "a belief".

As for the statement earlier about "disproving atheism", of course you can't disprove atheism. It's a negative statement - an assertion that there is no God - and thus by its nature unprovable. (After all, to disprove the assertion that a being does or does not stand outside the universe - a literally supernatural being - it would be necessary to stand outside the universe oneself, in order to make the observation. Thus, in order to attempt to disprove the existence of God, it would be necessary for one to become God. Rather a pretty paradox, really...)

The "Cambrian explosion" came after the pre-Cambrian mass extinction event (best guess as to the cause of that was an asteroidal impact, similar to the one blamed for the end of the Cretaceous period). The mass extinction left a great many ecological "slots" open, and new forms evolved to fill them.

Remember also that "suddenly" in this context is meant in the geological sense - that's tens of thousands of years to you and me.

This is all quite interesting, yet I still have doubts about the validity of macro evolution.
Perhaps I'll read a bit more on this topic.

End nescient interference.....

Maybe the secret to overcoming adversity is finding something even more intense than our misery, and focus on that.


.