Phagocyte wrote:
zghost wrote:
I don't believe that ANYONE is 100% straight or gay. Most people are just closer to one end of the spectrum or the other. There's a little (or a lot) of bisexuality in all of us, and I see no reason why anyone should be ashamed of that.
I have absolutely no problem with homosexuality or bisexuality, but I don't agree that sexuality is a spectrum. I am not attracted to males in the least bit, and I never once doubted my heterosexuality. I'm not doubting that it isn't a spectrum in some people, but I do not see the evidence that human sexuality as a whole is a variable spectrum.
I have wondered about that, there are few ideas in which all make sense, but which one is exactly the most accurate? The population control makes sense, although there are some other things to consider, when it comes to being a spectrum or not.
Many of the stuff we as heterosexual men like about women are social constructs, I think that the difference between femenine and masculine are partly artificial, examples: long hair, make-up, dresses, skirts, clothes, perfumes, shaven legs, shaven armpits, I have heard before that a woman with hairy armpits looked masculine, but then, that it is natural, doesn't it? how a woman naturally could be masculine? How attractive we would find a woman with very short hair, a man's hairstyle, without wearing make-up and dressed with man's clothes? That plus the gender roles on behaviour in some cultures. That raises the question of how attraction works, as it seems we are greatly influenced by these social and artificial constructs, which it seems to make a more notable difference, than nature would.
_________________
?Everything is perfect in the universe - even your desire to improve it.?