Asmodeus wrote:
Deciding to stop providing help or favours to others is as foolish as agreeing to all requests. The trick is to generate respect and favours in return for favours given. Tit for tat. That way you benefit yourself as much as you do to others.
You're preaching to the choir. We know it's supposed to be tit for tat, that's why willa is frustrated and felt the need to post here. It's fundamentally a communication problem. For example, I always operate under the presumption that things in life aren't free, favors included. So if I do a large favor for someone, I expect that person to pay up at some point. However, other people see my favor and think, "wow, he's such a 'naturally' kind person!" and do not automatically think that the recipient is all that beholden to me, so eventually they will take take take. Then when I get frustrated that all my energy is depleted, the people go, "what's wrong? I don't understand why you're upset."
I guess it's like friendships in a way. Just as a lot of Aspies will dive right into a friendship instead of building it over time, a lot of us will just do all sorts of large favors instead of doing a series of small ones first to make sure the other person reciprocates. But the issue then becomes, well, if we always tried tit for tat in smaller increments, who is the one who gradually makes the favor granting larger and larger in scope? Because although we'd like to think of tit for tat to maintain balance in the relationship, the truth is that in the end, the vast majority of favors have to be granted as one-sided, without prior knowledge of how that favor will be reciprocated. Sure, once I recognized a leech I could stop granting them favors in the future and cut it off before too much of my own time and energy was spent on that leech, but if everybody used this approach, people with big problems would find it incredibly difficult to overcome them if they could only rely on strangers or people they do not know well for help. This is not a problem for most people who tend to shove big problems under the rug, so this is why they don't see the downside of the approach you are suggesting... but when the sh!t hits the fan it is a very real downside with significant negative consequences.
_________________
Won't you help a poor little puppy?