ARustyFirePlace wrote:
tell that to women and they'll be all over you
Most people seem to really love clinging to their fantasies, and get highly offended if people point this out to them. People who are smarter than they are, scare and offend them. I have always thought it is a waste of life to spend it ignorant of reality. There is a wondrous, complex and beautiful universe all around them, and they have no interest in learning about it.
But then, that is caused by childhood abuse -- the abuse of destroying children's appetite for learning, by getting angry at them for asking questions, or giving them fake quick answers to make them go away. If it doesn't happen at home, it happens in the public "education" system, which is more a system of measuring how good students are at being unquestioning automatons, memorising useless and often incorrect "facts" to be forgotten after the exam.
On average it seems that adults remember about 5 to 10% of what they learned in school. This is not "learning" the way I view learning. To me, if you learn something, then you understand how it functions at a base level, something that is never forgotten. The only things that are forgotten are things you didn't understand or care about in the first place.
As a child, I studied body language people used, including when they were lying or joking, and was almost never tricked by my peers.
As an example, my sister and her friend use to tell us that they "rode their bicycles off to Candyland" each day one summer. I was not sure if this was possible or not, so I wanted to go with them to see if it were real, before I would believe them. Once it became clear that they would not take me and my friend there, I lost interest.
As I see it, if there is no way for something to be demonstrated and understood, then it is pointless to waste my time concerned with it.
I made a major discovery at age 14, which was that people may fully
believe what they say, and it can still be
completely incorrect.
At that point I made a conscious decision to modify my brain programming and never automatically believe what anybody says, even if I detect no deception from them. Since then I have not believed anything anybody has told me, or anything written in a book, on TV, in a documentary, etc. without first personally analysing it to see if it makes logical sense, and preferably hearing the same fact from numerous unrelated sources.
The way I modified my brain for making sure my facts were reliable, was adding a citation to every fact I store in my brain, which tells me the source of that information, and if I have analysed it yet. Then, when recalling a fact later on, if I can't remember the source of it, or if I haven't had a chance to analyse it to see if it makes sense, I simply discard the fact as unreliable before saying it out loud to someone.
This has proven to be an invaluable form of data integrity check for myself. Human brains modify memories each and every time they are recalled. Memories are additive. Whatever you are thinking about when you recall a memory, gets slightly connected to that memory. The only way to maintain accuracy in brain storage is therefore to implement systems of conscious checks and balances, so when the data changes form over time, this change is consciously perceived.
I regularly catch myself with this simple anti-bias programming, and have spent the years since developing new types of anti-bias routines for other situations (such as emotional bias).
Growing up after this, people often found it rude when I wouldn't
automatically believe them about things they believed in, so after a while I just stopped letting people know when I didn't agree with their "facts", to avoid them getting angry at me. I simply keep quiet, or use a nondescript response such as a nod of the head or a grunt, without actually saying that I agree. But when I do already agree with their fact, then I actually say so. In this way, they never catch on that I am not automatically believing everything they say, and they stay happy.
The exception is when I know that a person won't be offended by me being myself, in which case I will offer my differing opinion. Or chatting online, where I am usually free to [mostly] be myself, as people GETTING ANGRY USING CAPS LOCK AND SWEARING is much easier to calmly deal with than someone yelling at me in person.
_________________
"Efficiency is doing as much as possible, with as little as possible."
-- Raven Morris