I always have been to some degree, I heard horror stories about a major charity years ago re: its executives skimming funds, and thought, what if all the benevolent donation-hustlers are not so benevolent as they project themselves??? I tended to think, before, that charitable organizations don't attract sociopaths and narcissistic personality types as much as the corporate world, but NOPE, they're pretty much the same based on what I've researched!! ! It's actually quite sickening, that people are sick or dying or starving, and these evil gluttons stuff their pockets with ill-gotten gains and not think twice about it - but what can you do - the charitable sector has never been one for transparency or any form of public governance or oversight.
Take this excerpt from listverse.com...shudder!! !
A recently released expose concluded that as many as 50 large charities assign less than four percent of their funds to actual, charity-related activities. The remaining 96 percent of the donations they receive goes into the pockets of charity founders, operators, and solicitors. Kids Wish Network, a charity for dying children, has raised $125 million for the “cause.” Of that, $110 million went directly to solicitors and $4 million into the charity founder’s pockets.
These charities have been known to lie to donors, take multiple salaries, and arrange fundraising consultations that were schemed to benefit their bank accounts. In fact, they’re so deeply corrupted that they seem to mock the suffering of their supposed beneficiaries. An example is Cancer Fund of America, which had raised $100 million purportedly for the benefit of cancer patients, but then only gave useless trinkets, paper plates, and napkins to their dying recipients.