hyperlexian wrote:
i see what you mean - the actual shadows are... shadowy. i guess i didn't peer into the shadows to notice, becausei t jut looked logically darker in those areas.
Yep, that's it. They're
too shadowy.
Auto exposure tends to work from the brightest areas down towards the darkest, so if there's a very bright area with not much intervening tonality between that and the darkest areas then the exposure is skewed too far towards balancing the highlights - at the expense of shadow detail.
Eyeballs and the machinery driving them sorts all this stuff out automatically but it's practically impossible to duplicate that efficiency in camera firmware.
Quote:
i tend to overdo it with reducing contrast, myself.
When post-processing I always set up the levels first, so the brightest and the darkest levels are moved to sit at the extremes of the brightness range available. Ultimately it depends on the picture content, but generally that sorts things out well enough although sometimes the shadow detail still needs a small lightening tweak.
Heh.
Taking the picture is the easy part.
Making it a picture comes later.
_________________
Giraffe: a ruminant with a view.