Toe wrote:
Tim_Tex wrote:
Seattle was the place I was considering, but yes, it is expensive. (actually it was my third choice, because my first two choices--San Francisco and New York--were too expensive. Yes, I know NYC isn't southern or western, but I do hear it's a cool place!)
My focus had been on the Pacific Northwest. Pretty much anywhere north of the SF Bay Area is immune from wildfires, and there is only a very tiny risk of tsunamis. I don't know how expensive the rest of Washington State or Oregon are, and I know Idaho is dirt cheap (but also extremely conservative).
The Pacific Northwest is awesomely beautiful, and the people there are wonderful. Vancouver is the best city I've been to in several different ways.
But there are two problems. First, since you mentioned catastrophes, note that the fault lines in California go right up to Alaska. That whole coast is in constant geologic turmoil. That's why it's so darn beautiful.
Second, many places up there such as Seattle can go for over a hundred (even close to 200) days without ANY direct sunshine. That's why they drink so much coffee and have such high suicide rates. That and the loooong winter nights.
Really great otherwise though.

Another amazing thing about the Pacific Northwest is that food grows everywhere. My sister was unemployed during the summer but said that there were so many apple trees, cherry trees, filbert trees, pear trees,walnut trees, plum trees and blackberries growing wild that she was exactly starving.
No firefiles out here but some really cute banana slugs. The main reason I live here is because I can't stand high humidity. I like this climate.
_________________
Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.