TheDoctor82 wrote:
AnnePande wrote:
No offense to any native English speakers here.
But it bugs me when Danish people use English words and phrases (because they think it sounds more fancy?) when there are exactly as good words and phrases available in Danish.
As in, when they eat "leftovers" instead of "rester" for dinner, or talk to another one "face to face" instead of "ansigt til ansigt".
It also bugs me a bit when people talk about communication on the internet as opposite to "real life" communication. I mean: I know you can't see each other, but it is certainly a real person and not a machine you are communicating with on the net. (Those who don't acknowledge it may become so-called trolls.

)
I also mean: you would never say that an old fashioned communication by paper mail, or even a conversation on the phone, was not "real"?
Isn't it all because it's still a kind of new thing?
(Like when people complain about the net "stealing time from being with people" when they themselves use just as much time watching TV? Should that be more "real"? You don't even communicate watching TV!

And should it steal less time? It's just because you've got used to it over decades, while it's not (yet) the case with the internet!

)
reminds me of one of my "favorites":
"the person you talk to online could be lying to you, whereas you know what you're getting in person"
Really? Sorry...I usually notice little difference.
People lie to my face to me all the time offline, and as another example, it was widely mentioned back in the day that operators of certain Adult phone lines were actually male instead of female.
I think it's just a really poor excuse to keep everything verbal and "real"....but to do that, humans would actually have to be honest the majority of the time; that doesn't happen.
Yeah, that's funny. But maybe they mean, I"R"(!)L you at least won't take a man for a woman, or a creepy 60-year old man for a 20-year old handsome boy.
Another funny thing:
Often it is said that people easily misunderstand each other on the net, because they can't hear each other's intonation or see each other's facial expressions / body language.
But were / are there just as many misunderstandings in the communication by paper mail? No, people never complain(ed) about that. So why is it suddenly a problem?
Maybe you tend to write like you talk on the net, and it wasn't / isn't necessarily so in the paper mails?
Besides, on the net you can use a smiley, those were not invented in the good old paper-mail-only-days.
Sorry, couldn't resist.....