Page 1 of 1 [ 10 posts ] 

zeldapsychology
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 May 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,431
Location: Florida

02 Dec 2009, 12:46 pm

Sure we have water on both sides we'd flood or if I'm not mistaken it doesn't take much digging to reach water I'm not sure. But if you remember how the earth and countries were created EVERY STATE is on water so is there anything that makes say NY different than Florida besides the water on both sides? I'm not sure if when you dig you reach water quicker that was just a guess. Thanks. Also it's just an idea that popped into my head. (BTW googling= the restaurant chain BOO!)



MartyMoose
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Mar 2008
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 957
Location: Chicago

02 Dec 2009, 12:52 pm

Its in a swamp



raisedbyignorance
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Apr 2009
Age: 42
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,225
Location: Indiana

02 Dec 2009, 12:53 pm

The closest you got to a subway in your state I believe is the monorail at Walt Disney World. However it only travels between Magic Kingdom and Epcot cause it was too expensive too add on. :)



Tim_Tex
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Jul 2004
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 46,692
Location: Houston, Texas

02 Dec 2009, 1:43 pm

It probably has to do with the soil/water table. This is why Texas doesn't have them, either.


_________________
Who’s better at math than a robot? They’re made of math!


Friskeygirl
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Jun 2009
Age: 41
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,865

02 Dec 2009, 2:12 pm

The geology of Florida is mostly porous limestone, and a high water table, a lot of homes
have no basements in Florida, its also one of the reasons they get lots of sinkholes in that
state.



makuranososhi
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 May 2008
Age: 49
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,805
Location: Banned by Alex

02 Dec 2009, 3:08 pm

zeldapsychology wrote:
Sure we have water on both sides we'd flood or if I'm not mistaken it doesn't take much digging to reach water I'm not sure. But if you remember how the earth and countries were created EVERY STATE is on water so is there anything that makes say NY different than Florida besides the water on both sides? I'm not sure if when you dig you reach water quicker that was just a guess. Thanks. Also it's just an idea that popped into my head. (BTW googling= the restaurant chain BOO!)


I'm confused by the phrase in bold above; would you please explain? Arguably, the make-up of the soil, the height of the water table and the effects of two coastal tides upon that would likely all be part of the answer.


M.


_________________
My thanks to all the wonderful members here; I will miss the opportunity to continue to learn and work with you.

For those who seek an alternative, it is coming.

So long, and thanks for all the fish!


EnglishInvader
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Sep 2009
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,012
Location: Hertfordshire, UK

arielhawksquill
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Jun 2008
Age: 50
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,830
Location: Midwest

02 Dec 2009, 10:03 pm

Subways are incredibly difficult and expensive to dig. They are only a cost-effective solution for extremely dense cities that already have structures built on the surface such that the trains have to go underground. Anyplace that has plenty of open, undeveloped spaces like Florida will always have above-ground trains, if they have trains at all, simply because it's cheaper and easier to build them that way.



zeldapsychology
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 May 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,431
Location: Florida

03 Dec 2009, 8:57 am

makuranososhi wrote:
zeldapsychology wrote:
Sure we have water on both sides we'd flood or if I'm not mistaken it doesn't take much digging to reach water I'm not sure. But if you remember how the earth and countries were created EVERY STATE is on water so is there anything that makes say NY different than Florida besides the water on both sides? I'm not sure if when you dig you reach water quicker that was just a guess. Thanks. Also it's just an idea that popped into my head. (BTW googling= the restaurant chain BOO!)


I'm confused by the phrase in bold above; would you please explain? Arguably, the make-up of the soil, the height of the water table and the effects of two coastal tides upon that would likely all be part of the answer.




M.


I was thinking of Pangeria or whatever it was called. Where the continents came together to form the U.S.,and other countries. :-)



Ambivalence
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Nov 2008
Age: 48
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,613
Location: Peterlee (for Industry)

03 Dec 2009, 9:51 am

"Pangaea", 'tis.

There's two effects at work which change the shape and position of land masses - the continents themselves move (slowly) because they're sort-of floating on magma a looooong way down, and the global sea level goes up and down depending on how much of it is liquid water and how much is ice (much faster). Right now the Earth is relatively cold so there's a lot of ice and sea levels are low, meaning there's a lot of land. This is (we're still technically in an ice age) an interesting look at the way they've changed over time. I find it fascinating, 'cause you see how temporary a thing the current shapes of the land are.

There is a lot of water under the land but it's mostly held within porous rock rather than being free in underground rivers.

I'm not sure why Florida should be significantly worse than New York, or any other coastal place (like, say, London, or the Channel Tunnel). Maybe the type of rocks in the ground there aren't strong enough for making tunnels?


_________________
No one has gone missing or died.

The year is still young.