Kaybee wrote:
I grokked it. I like the word "grok." I think it's a better book for an adolescent than an adult, though. I'm sure I'd have loved it at 11-14 years old, but having read it at 22(ish?), I was turned off by the sense of self-importance I got from the author. Didn't everyone already think the kinds of things the author was trying to get his audience to think on their own without aid of a book by the time they were a teenager, anyway? My friend who read this book at 30 (and is the one who reccommended it to me) disagrees with me, though. He suggested that perhaps not most people are big thinkers as children. Anyway, I liked the beginning, but cared for it less and less as it went on and it all seemed very obvious and un-clever.
Mostly I was left disappointed that such a fantastic title was used up by a not-so-fantastic book.
big agree! hardly even sci-fi at all, really.
DeaconBlues wrote:
Zen wrote:
I tried reading the original uncut version and got bored of everyone having sex with each other. I'd like to read the edited version though. More words doesn't equal better writing.

If the people having sex bored you, don't go read the first-published version - most of what the editors removed had to do with philosophy and character development; they kept most of the sex, though.
interesting. could explain why i felt so disappointed.
_________________
If we concentrate on accepting ourselves, change will happen. It will take care of itself. Self-acceptance is so hard to get you can't do it a day at a time. I've found that I need to run my life five minutes at a time. --Jess Lair