Page 1 of 1 [ 6 posts ] 

beneficii
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 May 2005
Age: 42
Gender: Female
Posts: 7,245

23 Feb 2014, 5:55 pm

I noticed on my cardiologist office's records that I am marked as a "former smoker." I made clear to the assistant that I had only tried smoking a few times (the last time being several years ago) and never smoked regularly, so that classification may not be accurate or useful. I thought the issue was resolved, but when I received my summary of that visit, it still said "former smoker."

In that case, what defines a "former smoker"? As I understand, trying smoking a few times is very unlikely to have any major health effects; rather, what significantly increases your risk for conditions like COPD and lung cancer is regular use over a significant period of time. Because of that, it seems like it would serve no purpose to classify the former as a "former smoker," and such classification may even give a misleading impression to anyone checking the records, while it is the latter that should be so classified, if they have since stopped smoking and not restarted.

In either case, I will discuss this with my cardiologist when I go back to see her Friday.


_________________
"You have a responsibility to consider all sides of a problem and a responsibility to make a judgment and a responsibility to care for all involved." --Ian Danskin


babybird
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Nov 2011
Gender: Female
Posts: 96,102
Location: UK

23 Feb 2014, 6:00 pm

I reckon a former smoker is someone who used to smoke on a regular basis and then gave up.


_________________
we have existence


NEtikiman
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Apr 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 546
Location: Massachusetts, USA

23 Feb 2014, 6:03 pm

This is less likely a problem of definition and one of ongoing error. Once something is entered into medical records (erroneous or not), it is very hard to shed it.
I would keep pestering the doctor to have it removed and remind them that you don't really fit the classification, but, unless they try to put you through pointless tests, I don't know if it's really a problem.


_________________
Don't want the truth? Don't come to the park!


beneficii
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 May 2005
Age: 42
Gender: Female
Posts: 7,245

23 Feb 2014, 6:07 pm

NEtikiman wrote:
This is less likely a problem of definition and one of ongoing error. Once something is entered into medical records (erroneous or not), it is very hard to shed it.
I would keep pestering the doctor to have it removed and remind them that you don't really fit the classification, but, unless they try to put you through pointless tests, I don't know if it's really a problem.


I have good rapport with my cardiologist, so I can probably get it changed by talking to her. I just need to remember to make bullet points so I can remember to bring it up with her. LOL.


_________________
"You have a responsibility to consider all sides of a problem and a responsibility to make a judgment and a responsibility to care for all involved." --Ian Danskin


CockneyRebel
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Jul 2004
Age: 51
Gender: Male
Posts: 121,269
Location: In my own little country

23 Feb 2014, 6:08 pm

When a parent is a regular smoker and their children hang around them, they are breathing in the second hand smoke. Second hand smoke can also affect the organs of the body. Correct me if I'm wrong.


_________________
The Family Schlager


beneficii
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 May 2005
Age: 42
Gender: Female
Posts: 7,245

23 Feb 2014, 8:23 pm

CockneyRebel wrote:
When a parent is a regular smoker and their children hang around them, they are breathing in the second hand smoke. Second hand smoke can also affect the organs of the body. Correct me if I'm wrong.


My mum does smoke, but only outside. I try to avoid the smoke itself, though, so I'm not sure how affected I am.


_________________
"You have a responsibility to consider all sides of a problem and a responsibility to make a judgment and a responsibility to care for all involved." --Ian Danskin