...Briefly , Ameb ---- I think ythat , unfortunately
, entering a group home might turn into never getting out . The end of my " effective " life .
More on this later (also never seeing my brother again , either
) .
Amebix wrote:
No. I read online versions of the New York Times and Boston Globe, but that's a recent development. Before that I basically just followed online sources and pretty consistently read The Economist and Foreign Policy.
I'm already not the best at staying organized, so dealing with having a big newspaper everyday seems like a big hassle. I enjoy having physical copies of news magazines I like, like The Economist, Foreign Policy, and Foreign Affairs, but it's honestly a luxury. For the sake of efficiency and keeping things in order, electronic copies of everything tends to be preferable, unless there's something really notable in the issue that I think I'll hold onto.
Another thing is, now we're pretty aware of the biases of different news sources, so it is preferable to get things from a number of different sources... this is something the digital age really enables. To review, the New York Times is pretty much the gold standard of newspaper journalism and is great for keeping track of breaking world events. At the same time, it does have a very "establishment" perspective. Al Jazeera English does a lot of great stories especially on human rights, but it is rather left wing. Foreign Policy is a great, rather academic-influenced paper, but because of that it's pretty establishment. Foreign Affairs seems less beholden to establishment politics, but it's even more academic. The Economist is very much an establishment libertarian magazine, but on the plus side they're very transparent and honest about that. Libération is ultra-left wing.
The plus side of looking at a variety of sources is that you get different perspectives and analyses, and can form a better opinion. The downside, though, is that I think it's also becoming easier and easier to shut out perspectives we disagree with. Pretty much every source I pay attention to is either left wing, liberal, or libertarian. Because of this it's very easy to shut out conservative, right wing, and reactionary sources like Fox News, Breitbart, InfoWars, etc. because I have ZERO respect for them. But this means there's a fundamental disconnect between me and most right wingers in the country, even at the fundamental level of how we understand current events.
Another downside is I pay attention to events in world politics, because that's my interest. I'm interested in the arts (i.e. books, music, movies, etc.) and science, so I usually have a pretty good idea of what's happening in those realms. But I'm embarrassingly unknowledgeable about sports. And even in the arts, I know what's happening with, say, punk and indie rock, but I don't really have any idea what's happening with major pop stars, or even who many of them are. Again, this is because with the internet, I'm able to shut all of that out.
CHANGING TOPIC: ASS-P - have you looked into group homes? There are assisted living/group home set ups that I urge you to apply for. You're getting older, and it's clear you've had a very difficult time. I'm sure you're a good candidate for such homes. They should be able to help get you cleaned up, get some new teeth, and help you live more comfortably.
_________________
Renal kidney failure, congestive heart failure, COPD. Can't really get up from a floor position unhelped anymore:-(.
One of the walking wounded ~ SMASHED DOWN by life and age, now prevented from even expressing myself! SOB.
" Oh, no! First you have to PROVE you deserve to go away to college! " ~ My mother, 1978 (the heyday of Andy Gibb and Player). I would still like to go.

My life destroyed by Thorazine and Mellaril - and rape - and the Psychiatric/Industrial Complex. SOB:-(! !! !! !! !! !! !! !! !! !!