Page 1 of 1 [ 3 posts ] 

Space50
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

Joined: 28 Mar 2018
Gender: Male
Posts: 335

02 Aug 2019, 11:28 am

http://mentalfloss.com/article/53395/why-are-“ghost”-“ghastly”-and-“ghoul”-spelled-“gh”

Quote:
Why are “Ghost,” “Ghastly,” and “Ghoul” Spelled with “gh”?
BY Arika Okrent August 1, 2019

"Gh" is a strange way for an English word to start. There are only a handful of commonly used words that begin with this spelling. Beyond the spirit cluster of ghost, ghastly, and ghoul, we have borrowed words like ghetto, gherkin, and ghee, some place names like Ghana and Ghent, and that’s about it.

“Ghoul” was borrowed into English in the 1700s from the Arabic ghul, but at first without the "h," as “goul” or “goule.” It was later lured over to the ‘gh’ group by its semantic similarity to “ghost.”

But how did ghost get its "gh"? Compared to the other "gh" words, “ghost” is both a lot more frequent and a lot older, going all the way back to Old English gást. Until the 1500s, over a few centuries of language change, it was spelled gast, gæst, gost, goste, goost, and goist. “Ghastly” from the related, Middle English gastliche, also came in "h"-free spellings until the 1500s.

We can trace the introduction of the "h" in ghost and ghastly back to William Caxton, the man who brought the printing press to England. He had established his first press in Bruges, and he brought some Flemish typesetters back with him when he returned to set up business in Westminster. David Crystal writes, in his history of English spelling, that “in Bruges they would have been used to reading manuscripts in Flemish spelling. So if a word reminded them of its Flemish counterpart, why not spell it that way? The boss wouldn’t mind, as long as the words were intelligible. He had more to worry about than spelling.”

The typesetters also used "gh" in their spellings of “goose,” “goat,” and “girl,” but those spellings never caught on. For some reason, only “ghost” and “ghastly” kept the "h." Maybe because the words looked spookier that way. Indeed, a story about the ghost of a “ghoos ghoot gherle” sounds downright terrifying. Thank ghoodness those spellings have ghone.



IstominFan
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 25 Nov 2016
Age: 61
Gender: Female
Posts: 11,114
Location: Santa Maria, CA.

03 Aug 2019, 9:13 am

Interesting!



naturalplastic
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Aug 2010
Age: 71
Gender: Male
Posts: 35,189
Location: temperate zone

03 Aug 2019, 10:36 am

It is interesting.

I did a term paper in school about early printers in England who introduced the revolutinonary intormation technology invented by Gutenberg in Germany to the English speaking world in the 1500s. Dont remember much about the subject. But I do remember learning how standardized spelling just wasnt a thing back then in circa 1500. Shakespeare never even spelled his own name the same way twice. Even signed his name "Shaxper" once.

Caxton himself wrestled with the problem of standardized spelling. And took it upon himself to study Old English to get precedent for how to spell stuff. And then threw up his hands in despair concluding that "Old English is more like modern German than like modern English", and wasnt of any help. The "modern English" he was refering to was the English that he, Shakespeare, and the King James Bible, speak in. What we consider archaic today, but even that English had already evolved far beyond the language of the original Anglosaxon settlers of England centuries before.