RetroGamer87 wrote:
I'm definitely INT but for P/J I sit in the middle of the bell curve.
The problem with a system based on dichotomies is that most people sit in the middle of the bell curve. That's why they call it a bell curve. MBTI is interesting but in this regard I find it lacks nuance.
Jung didn't intend it as a measuring device. He said that psychiatrists (like him) need to communicate about personality and so he suggested this. He warned against pigeon-holing.
I've never heard of problems with a bell curve before and I'm puzzled. It's not a test in the sense of math test for example. The middle of this spectrum would mean "balanced" and not "average." I would like to hear more about this - I'm curious. I hate to think I'm missing out on something.
I want to tell you that we are 6 in our family. One of us is the oddball. I thought he was a flake, a weirdo, although Mom insisted we treat each other with respect. But one day, studying the MBTI, I found my oddball sib. That was when I found out Jung thinks my sib is a perfectly acceptable human being. It changed everything. That's why I stick to it so much.