DandelionFireworks wrote:
Precisely. Words fail the topic. It's an infinite continuum in an infinite number of directions. Let's not try to coin words to describe precise points and then argue about which of the infinite number of possible configurations that aren't precisely that are close enough to apply the word to. Atypical describes everything except one infinitely tiny point. Sometimes we draw a circle around the tiny point. But it's always arbitrary.
I think I know what you're talking about. I'm not very good with words, I tend to only understand more simple words. That's why I haven't been explaining myself clearly here in this topic, like you all have.
Anyway, my point is it's easy to argue over the word ''normal'', because it's one of those words what people use in every day conversations without really thinking of breaking it down to it's actual meaning. And because a lot of Aspies think logically, you probably have been breaking the word ''normal'' down to it's original meaning without thinking, ''I suppose we are more or less normal compared to some people, like severely Autistics, who are completely different and can't take part in society properly.'' So it's me who had got this topic a tad wrong because I didn't use the word ''normal'' logically.
For example, most NTs just call people ''abnormal'' when they've just done something wrong, instead of saying, ''what they've just done isn't right.'' For example, a couple of weeks ago I was in the back of my dad's car and my mum and dad were in the front, and a car behind wanted to overtake, but couldn't because there was too much traffic coming the other way. So in the end it drove up on the pavement (which is SO dangerious and strictly against the highway code), and then pulled in a gap again. My mum was shocked and said, ''that driver ain't normal!'' But she didn't mean the actual person ain't normal (well....the person must have been pretty stupid to think that driving on the pavement in a town is a ''good idea''), she just meant that the driver has just done something that is extremely wrong.
But, like I said before, just because someone has all the social cues, doesn't mean they're normal in other ways. Lacking social skills doesn't make you any less normal than someone who is lacking intelligence skills. My social skills might not be normal but that doesn't mean I'm not normal in other developments, like physical and intellectual, whereas someone might spend their whole life in a wheelchair and can't read, write, count or draw, but can communicate better than Aspies can.
So don't describe ''a normal person'' as ''someone with normal social skills''. Perhaps we could describe ''a normal person'' as ''an alive person'', and call dead people ''abnormal people'' simply because they haven't got thoughts and emotions. Now I can say that a normal person is ''a person who has rights''.
I don't know.
_________________
Female