Adults with Aspergers Seem 'Normal' to Me

Page 9 of 25 [ 398 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 ... 25  Next

nessa238
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Jul 2011
Age: 60
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,908
Location: UK

22 Apr 2012, 6:46 pm

Callista wrote:
Yes, I think the label "autistic" is very empowering to me. It's an acknowledgement that I am different, and that the differences are real and not character flaws; that I am allowed to be who I am, because it's something I was born with, not something I am doing just to be difficult. It's a badge of membership in the disability community.

"Autistic" is only disempowering if you buy into all the myths about it--that you can't be happy, that your life is worse than other people's lives, that you are inferior and to be pitied, that disability is something apart from "normal life", instead of being, as it actually is, a natural part of human existence. You dump those myths, and "autistic" can be a matter of identity, just like "black" or "American" or "scientist" might be.

Try it for yourself: Dump those myths, and then ask yourself why "autistic" is a bad thing. A lot of reasons will pop up, but you will realize that each one is a recording that society has imprinted you with. Once you knock those down, all you are left with is that it means you are different. And different is quite a neutral thing to be.


If it's a natural part of human existence why the need for a label at all?

I am no different to anyone else in my opinion - everyone has differences to others.



nessa238
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Jul 2011
Age: 60
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,908
Location: UK

22 Apr 2012, 6:47 pm

Sweetleaf wrote:
MotherKnowsBest wrote:
Nessa, for some people the label is empowering. Having it helps them to understand themselves, to come to terms with who they are, and to move on and start to build a better life for themselves. It can be the key that opens the door to all the help and support they need to have successful lives.


First one has to define success though.


Is there a success diagnosis? :twisted:



Sweetleaf
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Age: 36
Gender: Female
Posts: 35,278
Location: Somewhere in Colorado

22 Apr 2012, 6:48 pm

nessa238 wrote:
Callista wrote:
Yes, I think the label "autistic" is very empowering to me. It's an acknowledgement that I am different, and that the differences are real and not character flaws; that I am allowed to be who I am, because it's something I was born with, not something I am doing just to be difficult. It's a badge of membership in the disability community.

"Autistic" is only disempowering if you buy into all the myths about it--that you can't be happy, that your life is worse than other people's lives, that you are inferior and to be pitied, that disability is something apart from "normal life", instead of being, as it actually is, a natural part of human existence. You dump those myths, and "autistic" can be a matter of identity, just like "black" or "American" or "scientist" might be.

Try it for yourself: Dump those myths, and then ask yourself why "autistic" is a bad thing. A lot of reasons will pop up, but you will realize that each one is a recording that society has imprinted you with. Once you knock those down, all you are left with is that it means you are different. And different is quite a neutral thing to be.


If it's a natural part of human existence why the need for a label at all?

I am no different to anyone else in my opinion - everyone has differences to others.


so everyone's different but you're not different from anyone?


_________________
Tis the time to melt the Ice.


Sweetleaf
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Age: 36
Gender: Female
Posts: 35,278
Location: Somewhere in Colorado

22 Apr 2012, 6:49 pm

nessa238 wrote:
Sweetleaf wrote:
MotherKnowsBest wrote:
Nessa, for some people the label is empowering. Having it helps them to understand themselves, to come to terms with who they are, and to move on and start to build a better life for themselves. It can be the key that opens the door to all the help and support they need to have successful lives.


First one has to define success though.


Is there a success diagnosis? :twisted:


I don't know is there?


_________________
Tis the time to melt the Ice.


nessa238
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Jul 2011
Age: 60
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,908
Location: UK

22 Apr 2012, 6:50 pm

Sweetleaf wrote:
nessa238 wrote:
Sweetleaf wrote:
nessa238 wrote:
bnky wrote:
melanieeee wrote:
Maybe asperger's is a disorder which is predominate in childhood (like separation anxiety and bed wetting which may also occur in adulthood but to a smaller degree)?

People with adult diagnosis Asperger's still had the disorder to be diagnosed, so clearly it didn't just go away undiagnosed as they got older. I'd go so far as to say that, in my case, it's become more disabling as I've gotten older, as people seem to be more forgiving of social ineptness in the young.
I see Asperger's as an internal difference which (may be) noticed (by others) in the way the Aspie handles social situations. For me that is just a very tiny part of how Asperger's affects my life.
I hope psych students are being taught more than:
If you can't see the disorder just by looking at a person... it isn't there


Most psych students are pretty stupid - you are hoping for a miracle if you expect them to be able to help you. We are perfectly capable of helping ourselves. The Aspergers diagnosis encourages a passive victim mentality. The disorder is there if you want it to be; if you choose to see it as just a normal style of thinking and communicating, it isn't a disorder.


How the hell does it do that? I did not see it say anywhere in the criteria that encouraged such things......and some of us are victims of things, kinda hard to go through life without ever being the victim of anything even if its something as insignificant as a cold. But yeah especially when you differ from what is considered normal......and then have to deal with bullying and being singled out by teachers who are in on it. ........and its not a normal style of thinking and communicating, the whole reason its in the DSM is because it is different....if it was not different than neurotypical thinking it would not be listed as a disorder at all.


I'd never considered myself to be the 'victim' of a cold to be quite honest.

Alright well I guess people also have different views on what exactly that means, so I'll just leave that alone for now.

People get bullied at school for all sorts of reasons, many completely unconnected with being autistic eg for being overweight or unattractive - are there special DSM diagnoses for being fat/ugly? Nope thought not - these people just have to get on with it, so as far as I'm concerned so can I!

I know people get bullied at school for all sorts of reasons...I got bullied a lot and no one knew I had autism, to them I was just the weird kid and somehow that made me deserving of it in their eyes, or maybe they just thought it fun. But yes there are various reasons for bullying none of them justify it though.


Life is essentially very cruel and if a person constantly plays the victim card they will get short shrift from the majority - that's a fact

And what do you define playing the victim card, acknowledging one has problems and has had bad experiences or has been harassed by other people.....or would you define it as exageratting in an attempt to manipulate, if you mean the latter than I fully agree...if not what do you suggest people do magically not be effected by things that cause them pain?

There are differing styles of thinking and communication - some more common than others - that does not mean that the thinking/communication style common to some people with
Aspergers is abnormal - it's just a natural human variant

variant usually implies abnormal, otherwise it would not be a variant.

I've come across numerous people who say they have Asperger's who seem to epitomise what people tend to classify as 'NT' thinking and communication styles so we aren't even comparing apples with apples a lot of the time!

I get on best with kind, thoughtful, intelligent people WHATEVER their thinking/communication style

I have no more in common with another person with Aspergers than I do with a person with asthma! It's the intelligence level that will determine whether we get on, certainly not whether they say they have Aspergers.

Yeah same here I like people who are intresting, intelligent, kind and all that.......I don't care if they have AS, are neurotypical or anything like that I care if I get along with them.


The best 'joke' of all is that the DSM-IV that you seem to put such great faith in, as if it were the Oracle of Delphi, has decreed that Asperger's Syndrome isn't even going to exist as a diagnosis anymore in May 2013 when DSM-V comes out, so so much for their staggering insight! So much for how necessary they think Asperger's is!

I see the DSM for what it is its a book with all the mental disorders and symptoms listed, used as a reference guide by mental health professionals, that is all. Why would I give the DSM bible like status? that would be pretty stupid actually. Also aspergers is a form of autism, so I think its great they are getting rid of the term aspergers and instead having an autism spectrum that people diagnosed with aspergers will fall under.


They think so much of your precious diagnosis they're jettisoning it right out of the manual!


What precious diagnosis exactly? Also they are just merging autism and aspergers........and finally I've read the proposed DSM 5 criteria and under it I would be considered to have autism.....but yeah not everyone on the spectrum has been officially diagnosed.
I see the DSM for what it is its a book with all the mental disorders and symptoms listed, used as a reference guide by mental health professionals, that is all. Why would I give the DSM bible like status? that would be pretty stupid actually. Also aspergers is a form of autism, so I think its great they are getting rid of the term aspergers and instead having an autism spectrum that people diagnosed with aspergers will fall under.


The Asperger's Syndrome diagnosis that I explained won't be in DSM-V

I said 'precious' because its seems to be a label that people cling to for dear life,
as if taking it away would ruin their lives

I'd hate the idea of being termed 'autistic' even more than I dislike the Asperger's Syndrome label

That's just me though



hanyo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Sep 2011
Age: 51
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,302

22 Apr 2012, 6:51 pm

Well one thing the label got me is this site. If I thought I definitely didn't have aspergers I wouldn't be here on this site posting. I feel like I fit in here better than on any other message board I've been on.



nessa238
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Jul 2011
Age: 60
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,908
Location: UK

22 Apr 2012, 6:52 pm

Sweetleaf wrote:
nessa238 wrote:
Sweetleaf wrote:
MotherKnowsBest wrote:
Nessa, for some people the label is empowering. Having it helps them to understand themselves, to come to terms with who they are, and to move on and start to build a better life for themselves. It can be the key that opens the door to all the help and support they need to have successful lives.


First one has to define success though.


Is there a success diagnosis? :twisted:


I don't know is there?


Lol I was being facetious

They are merrily making up new diagnoses for every facet of human behaviour in the DSM

"Dangerously Successful" is bound to make it into there at some point (that's sarcasm btw)



Who_Am_I
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Aug 2005
Age: 42
Gender: Female
Posts: 12,632
Location: Australia

22 Apr 2012, 6:53 pm

nessa238 wrote:
XFilesGeek wrote:
nessa238 wrote:
Adults with Aspergers are normal.


No, I'm not.

Quote:
It's just the set of personality traits associated with AS have become unpopular in today's dumbed-down hyper-social society.


Society is no more "dumbed-down" than it ever was.

Quote:
It's society telling intelligent introverts they don't fit basically. Instead of meekly letting themselves be saddled with the Asperger label like the lab rats we've been treated as by the DSM-IV, the people with these traits should have just told society to f-k off! Far healthier!


No, it isn't.

"Aspergers" is not "just introversion."

I swear, this is why I don't bother with this forum hardly at all anymore.


In what ways are you 'not normal'?

If you can't see how dumbed down society has become even in just the last 20 years I feel sorry for you - you are a prime example of that very society!

You can say Asperger's is whatever you like - most people with Aspergers regularly do!

I prefer to dispense with a disempowering label


Nice debating tactics there.
So tell me, do you always insult people who disagree with you, or do you sometimes prefer reasoned argument and actually stating clear facts?


_________________
Music Theory 101: Cadences.
Authentic cadence: V-I
Plagal cadence: IV-I
Deceptive cadence: V- ANYTHING BUT I ! !! !
Beethoven cadence: V-I-V-I-V-V-V-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I
-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I! I! I! I I I


nessa238
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Jul 2011
Age: 60
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,908
Location: UK

22 Apr 2012, 6:53 pm

hanyo wrote:
Well one thing the label got me is this site. If I thought I definitely didn't have aspergers I wouldn't be here on this site posting. I feel like I fit in here better than on any other message board I've been on.


Yes that is one advantage - a connection to more intelligent people



Sweetleaf
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Age: 36
Gender: Female
Posts: 35,278
Location: Somewhere in Colorado

22 Apr 2012, 6:56 pm

nessa238 wrote:
Sweetleaf wrote:
nessa238 wrote:
Sweetleaf wrote:
nessa238 wrote:
bnky wrote:
melanieeee wrote:
Maybe asperger's is a disorder which is predominate in childhood (like separation anxiety and bed wetting which may also occur in adulthood but to a smaller degree)?

People with adult diagnosis Asperger's still had the disorder to be diagnosed, so clearly it didn't just go away undiagnosed as they got older. I'd go so far as to say that, in my case, it's become more disabling as I've gotten older, as people seem to be more forgiving of social ineptness in the young.
I see Asperger's as an internal difference which (may be) noticed (by others) in the way the Aspie handles social situations. For me that is just a very tiny part of how Asperger's affects my life.
I hope psych students are being taught more than:
If you can't see the disorder just by looking at a person... it isn't there


Most psych students are pretty stupid - you are hoping for a miracle if you expect them to be able to help you. We are perfectly capable of helping ourselves. The Aspergers diagnosis encourages a passive victim mentality. The disorder is there if you want it to be; if you choose to see it as just a normal style of thinking and communicating, it isn't a disorder.


How the hell does it do that? I did not see it say anywhere in the criteria that encouraged such things......and some of us are victims of things, kinda hard to go through life without ever being the victim of anything even if its something as insignificant as a cold. But yeah especially when you differ from what is considered normal......and then have to deal with bullying and being singled out by teachers who are in on it. ........and its not a normal style of thinking and communicating, the whole reason its in the DSM is because it is different....if it was not different than neurotypical thinking it would not be listed as a disorder at all.


I'd never considered myself to be the 'victim' of a cold to be quite honest.

Alright well I guess people also have different views on what exactly that means, so I'll just leave that alone for now.

People get bullied at school for all sorts of reasons, many completely unconnected with being autistic eg for being overweight or unattractive - are there special DSM diagnoses for being fat/ugly? Nope thought not - these people just have to get on with it, so as far as I'm concerned so can I!

I know people get bullied at school for all sorts of reasons...I got bullied a lot and no one knew I had autism, to them I was just the weird kid and somehow that made me deserving of it in their eyes, or maybe they just thought it fun. But yes there are various reasons for bullying none of them justify it though.


Life is essentially very cruel and if a person constantly plays the victim card they will get short shrift from the majority - that's a fact

And what do you define playing the victim card, acknowledging one has problems and has had bad experiences or has been harassed by other people.....or would you define it as exageratting in an attempt to manipulate, if you mean the latter than I fully agree...if not what do you suggest people do magically not be effected by things that cause them pain?

There are differing styles of thinking and communication - some more common than others - that does not mean that the thinking/communication style common to some people with
Aspergers is abnormal - it's just a natural human variant

variant usually implies abnormal, otherwise it would not be a variant.

I've come across numerous people who say they have Asperger's who seem to epitomise what people tend to classify as 'NT' thinking and communication styles so we aren't even comparing apples with apples a lot of the time!

I get on best with kind, thoughtful, intelligent people WHATEVER their thinking/communication style

I have no more in common with another person with Aspergers than I do with a person with asthma! It's the intelligence level that will determine whether we get on, certainly not whether they say they have Aspergers.

Yeah same here I like people who are intresting, intelligent, kind and all that.......I don't care if they have AS, are neurotypical or anything like that I care if I get along with them.


The best 'joke' of all is that the DSM-IV that you seem to put such great faith in, as if it were the Oracle of Delphi, has decreed that Asperger's Syndrome isn't even going to exist as a diagnosis anymore in May 2013 when DSM-V comes out, so so much for their staggering insight! So much for how necessary they think Asperger's is!

I see the DSM for what it is its a book with all the mental disorders and symptoms listed, used as a reference guide by mental health professionals, that is all. Why would I give the DSM bible like status? that would be pretty stupid actually. Also aspergers is a form of autism, so I think its great they are getting rid of the term aspergers and instead having an autism spectrum that people diagnosed with aspergers will fall under.


They think so much of your precious diagnosis they're jettisoning it right out of the manual!


What precious diagnosis exactly? Also they are just merging autism and aspergers........and finally I've read the proposed DSM 5 criteria and under it I would be considered to have autism.....but yeah not everyone on the spectrum has been officially diagnosed.
I see the DSM for what it is its a book with all the mental disorders and symptoms listed, used as a reference guide by mental health professionals, that is all. Why would I give the DSM bible like status? that would be pretty stupid actually. Also aspergers is a form of autism, so I think its great they are getting rid of the term aspergers and instead having an autism spectrum that people diagnosed with aspergers will fall under.


The Asperger's Syndrome diagnosis that I explained won't be in DSM-V

I know, it will be merged with autism.....in the catagory Autism Spectrum, most people with an AS diagnoses would fit the diagnostic criteria for being on the autism spectrum and thus autistic. Makes more sense then having aspergers and autism listed as seperate disorders since both are actually autism.


I said 'precious' because its seems to be a label that people cling to for dear life,
as if taking it away would ruin their lives.

Well I'm not diagnosed.....so there is nothing for anyone to take away, I got why you said it though.

I'd hate the idea of being termed 'autistic' even more than I dislike the Asperger's Syndrome label

That's just me though


I personally don't really care, I don't see what is so bad about autism.....it just means my brain wiring is different from neurotypical brain wiring and causes me some difficulties they don't have to deal with. That said its not as though I tell everyone I meet that I have autism, sometimes I find it better to keep that to myself...especially if I'm forced to be around judgemental, ignorant people.


_________________
Tis the time to melt the Ice.


Sweetleaf
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Age: 36
Gender: Female
Posts: 35,278
Location: Somewhere in Colorado

22 Apr 2012, 6:56 pm

nessa238 wrote:
Sweetleaf wrote:
nessa238 wrote:
Sweetleaf wrote:
nessa238 wrote:
bnky wrote:
melanieeee wrote:
Maybe asperger's is a disorder which is predominate in childhood (like separation anxiety and bed wetting which may also occur in adulthood but to a smaller degree)?

People with adult diagnosis Asperger's still had the disorder to be diagnosed, so clearly it didn't just go away undiagnosed as they got older. I'd go so far as to say that, in my case, it's become more disabling as I've gotten older, as people seem to be more forgiving of social ineptness in the young.
I see Asperger's as an internal difference which (may be) noticed (by others) in the way the Aspie handles social situations. For me that is just a very tiny part of how Asperger's affects my life.
I hope psych students are being taught more than:
If you can't see the disorder just by looking at a person... it isn't there


Most psych students are pretty stupid - you are hoping for a miracle if you expect them to be able to help you. We are perfectly capable of helping ourselves. The Aspergers diagnosis encourages a passive victim mentality. The disorder is there if you want it to be; if you choose to see it as just a normal style of thinking and communicating, it isn't a disorder.


How the hell does it do that? I did not see it say anywhere in the criteria that encouraged such things......and some of us are victims of things, kinda hard to go through life without ever being the victim of anything even if its something as insignificant as a cold. But yeah especially when you differ from what is considered normal......and then have to deal with bullying and being singled out by teachers who are in on it. ........and its not a normal style of thinking and communicating, the whole reason its in the DSM is because it is different....if it was not different than neurotypical thinking it would not be listed as a disorder at all.


I'd never considered myself to be the 'victim' of a cold to be quite honest.

Alright well I guess people also have different views on what exactly that means, so I'll just leave that alone for now.

People get bullied at school for all sorts of reasons, many completely unconnected with being autistic eg for being overweight or unattractive - are there special DSM diagnoses for being fat/ugly? Nope thought not - these people just have to get on with it, so as far as I'm concerned so can I!

I know people get bullied at school for all sorts of reasons...I got bullied a lot and no one knew I had autism, to them I was just the weird kid and somehow that made me deserving of it in their eyes, or maybe they just thought it fun. But yes there are various reasons for bullying none of them justify it though.


Life is essentially very cruel and if a person constantly plays the victim card they will get short shrift from the majority - that's a fact

And what do you define playing the victim card, acknowledging one has problems and has had bad experiences or has been harassed by other people.....or would you define it as exageratting in an attempt to manipulate, if you mean the latter than I fully agree...if not what do you suggest people do magically not be effected by things that cause them pain?

There are differing styles of thinking and communication - some more common than others - that does not mean that the thinking/communication style common to some people with
Aspergers is abnormal - it's just a natural human variant

variant usually implies abnormal, otherwise it would not be a variant.

I've come across numerous people who say they have Asperger's who seem to epitomise what people tend to classify as 'NT' thinking and communication styles so we aren't even comparing apples with apples a lot of the time!

I get on best with kind, thoughtful, intelligent people WHATEVER their thinking/communication style

I have no more in common with another person with Aspergers than I do with a person with asthma! It's the intelligence level that will determine whether we get on, certainly not whether they say they have Aspergers.

Yeah same here I like people who are intresting, intelligent, kind and all that.......I don't care if they have AS, are neurotypical or anything like that I care if I get along with them.


The best 'joke' of all is that the DSM-IV that you seem to put such great faith in, as if it were the Oracle of Delphi, has decreed that Asperger's Syndrome isn't even going to exist as a diagnosis anymore in May 2013 when DSM-V comes out, so so much for their staggering insight! So much for how necessary they think Asperger's is!

I see the DSM for what it is its a book with all the mental disorders and symptoms listed, used as a reference guide by mental health professionals, that is all. Why would I give the DSM bible like status? that would be pretty stupid actually. Also aspergers is a form of autism, so I think its great they are getting rid of the term aspergers and instead having an autism spectrum that people diagnosed with aspergers will fall under.


They think so much of your precious diagnosis they're jettisoning it right out of the manual!


What precious diagnosis exactly? Also they are just merging autism and aspergers........and finally I've read the proposed DSM 5 criteria and under it I would be considered to have autism.....but yeah not everyone on the spectrum has been officially diagnosed.
I see the DSM for what it is its a book with all the mental disorders and symptoms listed, used as a reference guide by mental health professionals, that is all. Why would I give the DSM bible like status? that would be pretty stupid actually. Also aspergers is a form of autism, so I think its great they are getting rid of the term aspergers and instead having an autism spectrum that people diagnosed with aspergers will fall under.


The Asperger's Syndrome diagnosis that I explained won't be in DSM-V

I know, it will be merged with autism.....in the catagory Autism Spectrum, most people with an AS diagnoses would fit the diagnostic criteria for being on the autism spectrum and thus autistic. Makes more sense then having aspergers and autism listed as seperate disorders since both are actually autism.


I said 'precious' because its seems to be a label that people cling to for dear life,
as if taking it away would ruin their lives.

Well I'm not diagnosed.....so there is nothing for anyone to take away, I got why you said it though.

I'd hate the idea of being termed 'autistic' even more than I dislike the Asperger's Syndrome label

That's just me though


I personally don't really care, I don't see what is so bad about autism.....it just means my brain wiring is different from neurotypical brain wiring and causes me some difficulties they don't have to deal with. That said its not as though I tell everyone I meet that I have autism, sometimes I find it better to keep that to myself...especially if I'm forced to be around judgemental, ignorant people.


_________________
Tis the time to melt the Ice.


scubasteve
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Dec 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,001
Location: San Francisco

22 Apr 2012, 6:56 pm

nessa238 wrote:
scubasteve wrote:
nessa238 wrote:
I prefer to dispense with a disempowering label


So why are you here?

Honest question.


There's intelligent people on here, some of whom I can relate well to

My own relationship to the Asperger label doesn't mean I don't want to converse with some people who might want to retain the label

Having had my own personal 'epiphany' ie that I'm better off without the label, I am sharing it
in the hope of possibly helping others but it's not compulsory to take my advice - it's only my individual opinion, as all posts on here are.


It's great that you've found some people you can relate to, and I don't want to discourage you from doing so. However, I think you need to learn more about Asperger's Syndrome and the individual differences we all have (even within this community) before giving advice on the topic. Some of your recent posts could be perceived as offensive, and I don't think you meant it that way. Just because we all have AS does not mean we all have the same experiences or capacities. Please read others' responses carefuly and try to think about how their experiences may have been different from your own.



nessa238
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Jul 2011
Age: 60
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,908
Location: UK

22 Apr 2012, 6:56 pm

Who_Am_I wrote:
nessa238 wrote:
XFilesGeek wrote:
nessa238 wrote:
Adults with Aspergers are normal.


No, I'm not.

Quote:
It's just the set of personality traits associated with AS have become unpopular in today's dumbed-down hyper-social society.


Society is no more "dumbed-down" than it ever was.

Quote:
It's society telling intelligent introverts they don't fit basically. Instead of meekly letting themselves be saddled with the Asperger label like the lab rats we've been treated as by the DSM-IV, the people with these traits should have just told society to f-k off! Far healthier!


No, it isn't.

"Aspergers" is not "just introversion."

I swear, this is why I don't bother with this forum hardly at all anymore.


In what ways are you 'not normal'?

If you can't see how dumbed down society has become even in just the last 20 years I feel sorry for you - you are a prime example of that very society!

You can say Asperger's is whatever you like - most people with Aspergers regularly do!

I prefer to dispense with a disempowering label


Nice debating tactics there.
So tell me, do you always insult people who disagree with you, or do you sometimes prefer reasoned argument and actually stating clear facts?


I was making an observation; if you are too much a product of a particular type of society you won't see the wood for the trees

I have this theory that people who get an Asperger's diagnosis or think they have it often have identity issues - then I read your user name and I'm afraid I found it a bit amusing!



MotherKnowsBest
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Nov 2009
Age: 54
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,196

22 Apr 2012, 6:56 pm

Sweetleaf wrote:
MotherKnowsBest wrote:
Nessa, for some people the label is empowering. Having it helps them to understand themselves, to come to terms with who they are, and to move on and start to build a better life for themselves. It can be the key that opens the door to all the help and support they need to have successful lives.


First one has to define success though.


To me success is getting what you want out of life, reaching your goals. I guess that varies from person to person.



nessa238
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Jul 2011
Age: 60
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,908
Location: UK

22 Apr 2012, 7:07 pm

scubasteve wrote:
nessa238 wrote:
scubasteve wrote:
nessa238 wrote:
I prefer to dispense with a disempowering label


So why are you here?

Honest question.


There's intelligent people on here, some of whom I can relate well to

My own relationship to the Asperger label doesn't mean I don't want to converse with some people who might want to retain the label

Having had my own personal 'epiphany' ie that I'm better off without the label, I am sharing it
in the hope of possibly helping others but it's not compulsory to take my advice - it's only my individual opinion, as all posts on here are.


It's great that you've found some people you can relate to, and I don't want to discourage you from doing so. However, I think you need to learn more about Asperger's Syndrome and the individual differences we all have (even within this community) before giving advice on the topic. Some of your recent posts could be perceived as offensive, and I don't think you meant it that way. Just because we all have AS does not mean we all have the same experiences or capacities. Please read others' responses carefuly and try to think about how their experiences may have been different from your own.


Oh I've studied Asperger's alright - I've researched it to death!

I reached complete saturation point with it and decided I'd had enough of it

I find it a bit patronising being told what to do when you are telling me not to advise others - seems a little hypocritical

I have already said each to their own and that I am just relaying my own thoughts

I don't really understand why people are so touchy about having the Asperger's diagnosis validity questioned - if they are secure in their belief it's a great thing to have why get so worked up about it being questioned?

It's like faith in God - if you really believe in God (as I do), you don't tend to care what others
think if you are sufficiently secure in your belief

If you're a bit wobbly in your belief though you may get a bit worked up about it...



MotherKnowsBest
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Nov 2009
Age: 54
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,196

22 Apr 2012, 7:10 pm

nessa238 wrote:
MotherKnowsBest wrote:
Nessa, for some people the label is empowering. Having it helps them to understand themselves, to come to terms with who they are, and to move on and start to build a better life for themselves. It can be the key that opens the door to all the help and support they need to have successful lives.


But there often isn't any help and support available - there's none where I live that's for sure

Can someone please define what all this help and support actually is and where they get it from?

I am merely advocating self-help in the absence of any support from elsewhere - that seems logical to me.

I can see that for some people the label is important to them but it's isn't to me - it's been a positive hindrance


I can understand your frustration. I got no help at all when I was in the UK either. It was only when I left that I really saw how bad services are in the UK. Where I am we have 'Vuxenhabilitering' which is a unit at the local hospital for people with an autism diagnosis. I can contact them through my doctor, uni, or ring them myself anytime. They have doctors, occupational therapists, psychologists, physiotherapists, counsellors, etc all with specialist knowledge of autism. Tomorrow one of the occupational therapist is coming out to my house to help me with routines and structures for managing day-to-day household chores. Wednesday I go into the unit to meet someone who is going to help me fill out all the paperwork for my student loans (as I'll just pretend they don't exist otherwise). My daughter (also ASD) has CBT there once a week and they send people into her school to train all the teachers on how to deal with her specific needs.