Page 2 of 2 [ 18 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

noob-leech
Emu Egg
Emu Egg

User avatar

Joined: 25 Jul 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 1

30 Jul 2009, 12:12 am

Sora wrote:
Once upon a time... (something like that) high-functioning was the unofficial description of a DSM-IV-TR diagnosis of autistic disorder without an Axis-III diagnosis of mental retardation. (It is Axis-III I believe?)


Mental retardation is in Axis II.

Let's list the DSM-IV axes here:

Axis I: Psychiatric diagnoses including mental, developmental and learning disorders (e.g. depression/bipolar, anxiety, schizophrenia, ADHD, autism)
Axis II: Personality disorders and mental retardation
Axis III: Other medical diagnoses (e.g. diabetes type 2)
Axis IV: Psychosocial and environmental factors (e.g. in prison, on welfare)
Axis V: Global assessment of functioning

I think Axis V refers more on the high- and low-functioning levels. People with other disorders (e.g. borderline personality disorder) also use this "high-" or "low-functioning" labels too.

There are huge controversies about the Axis II disorders. The way they put personality disorders on a separate axis can lead to double stigmatization.



ChangelingGirl
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Sep 2007
Age: 40
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,640
Location: Netherlands

30 Jul 2009, 4:51 am

noob-leech wrote:
I think Axis V refers more on the high- and low-functioning levels. People with other disorders (e.g. borderline personality disorder) also use this "high-" or "low-functioning" labels too.


I think so, too, if there is to be a distinction at all. But then where would one put the line? And besides, onés GAF score is really arbitrary, eg. if you have poor hygiene, you get a low GAF score, while with poor hygiene you may function academically/occupationally at a level highewr than when you dont'have problems with hygiene. Same with some impairments in communication, when you intrinsically have a lower GAF score.

Quote:
There are huge controversies about the Axis II disorders. The way they put personality disorders on a separate axis can lead to double stigmatization.


The reasoning behind this is that personality disorders and mental retardation are presumed to be life-long, pervasive, hard-to-treat disorders, while axis I disorders are more treatable and less pervasive and long-lasting. If this distinction needs to be made at all, IMO, I think autism spectrum disorders should be on axis II, where they used to be in DSM-III.